Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin K. Johnson

dblp:124/7769 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1482-1032ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing read preprocessing
duplicate marking
0.712023
Dupsifter: a lightweight duplicate marking tool for whole genome bisulfite sequencing · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.712023
Dupsifter: a lightweight duplicate marking tool for whole genome bisulfite sequencing · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

streaming alignment · 0.7duplicate marking · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Dupsifter: a lightweight duplicate marking tool for whole genome bisulfite sequencing
abstract
SUMMARY: In whole genome sequencing data, polymerase chain reaction amplification results in duplicate DNA fragments coming from the same location in the genome. The process of preparing a whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) library, on the other hand, can create two DNA fragments from the same location that should not be considered duplicates. Currently, only one WGBS-aware duplicate marking tool exists. However, it only works with the output from a single tool, does not accept streaming input or output, and requires a substantial amount of memory relative to the input size. Dupsifter provides an aligner-agnostic duplicate marking tool that is lightweight, has streaming capabilities, and is memory efficient. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and binaries are freely available at https://github.com/huishenlab/dupsifter under the MIT license. Dupsifter is implemented in C and is supported on macOS and Linux.
Jacob Morrison, Wanding Zhou, Benjamin K. Johnson
Bioinform.3
2016 SPARTA: Simple Program for Automated reference-based bacterial RNA-seq Transcriptome Analysis
abstract
BACKGROUND: Many tools exist in the analysis of bacterial RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) transcriptional profiling experiments to identify differentially expressed genes between experimental conditions. Generally, the workflow includes quality control of reads, mapping to a reference, counting transcript abundance, and statistical tests for differentially expressed genes. In spite of the numerous tools developed for each component of an RNA-seq analysis workflow, easy-to-use bacterially oriented workflow applications to combine multiple tools and automate the process are lacking. With many tools to choose from for each step, the task of identifying a specific tool, adapting the input/output options to the specific use-case, and integrating the tools into a coherent analysis pipeline is not a trivial endeavor, particularly for microbiologists with limited bioinformatics experience. RESULTS: To make bacterial RNA-seq data analysis more accessible, we developed a Simple Program for Automated reference-based bacterial RNA-seq Transcriptome Analysis (SPARTA). SPARTA is a reference-based bacterial RNA-seq analysis workflow application for single-end Illumina reads. SPARTA is turnkey software that simplifies the process of analyzing RNA-seq data sets, making bacterial RNA-seq analysis a routine process that can be undertaken on a personal computer or in the classroom. The easy-to-install, complete workflow processes whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing data files by trimming reads and removing adapters, mapping reads to a reference, counting gene features, calculating differential gene expression, and, importantly, checking for potential batch effects within the data set. SPARTA outputs quality analysis reports, gene feature counts and differential gene expression tables and scatterplots. CONCLUSIONS: SPARTA provides an easy-to-use bacterial RNA-seq transcriptional profiling workflow to identify differentially expressed genes between experimental conditions. This software will enable microbiologists with limited bioinformatics experience to analyze their data and integrate next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies into the classroom. The SPARTA software and tutorial are available at sparta.readthedocs.org.
Benjamin K. Johnson, Matthew B. Scholz, Tracy K. Teal, Robert B. Abramovitch
BMC Bioinform.1