Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wanda L. Mammel
dblp:124/8856
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis |
0.0 | 1 | 1965 | A Note on the Location of the Binary Point in a Computing Machine · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1965 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › threshold logic synthesis
threshold function identification |
0.0 | 1 | 1965 | A Note on the Location of the Binary Point in a Computing Machine · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1965 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
threshold functions |
0.0 | 1 | 1965 | A Note on the Location of the Binary Point in a Computing Machine · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1965 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
k-monotonicity conditions · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1982 | Counting formulas for tree growth plansabstractAbstract We present counting formulas for the number of different ways to grow a given rooted tree, over a specified number of intervals. We call these growth plans, or simply plans. This problem arises, for example, in analog toll‐connect networks in which it is desired to introduce digital technology to serve increasing circuit requirements, in the cheapest way. Each circuit in such a network extends from a particular node called the toll center to one of the other nodes. The toll center corresponds to the root, and the portion of the network containing digital equipment corresponds to the rooted subtree whose growth we study. Even for networks of modest size and few growth intervals, the number of plans is too large to permit finding the cheapest by an exhaustive search. We observe that plans differing only in their growth pattern in the neighborhood of some particular node have cost differences that depend principally on their local growth patterns. It is therefore often possible to eliminate at a single stroke a large class of plans having a specified local growth plan at a particular node. By repetition, the number of remaining plans that must have their individual total costs computed can often be reduced to a number sufficiently small for an exhaustive search. We describe two types of local growth behavior appropriate for eliminating classes of plans in this network problem, and give corresponding counting formulas for the number of tree growth plans under these restrictions. A generalized counting formula with arbitrary local restrictions at each node is presented; this general formula contains the prior results as special cases. Finally, an example illustrates the great reduction in number of plans that can sometimes be obtained. Harrison E. Rowe, Wanda L. Mammel |
Networks | 2 |
| 1965 | A Note on the Location of the Binary Point in a Computing MachineabstractNecessary conditions that a switching function be, in particular, a threshold function have been introduced by Paull and McCluskey [11]; named and studied at some length by Winder [13], [14], [15] and Muroga, et al. [8]; and generalized by Elgot [3], Winder [14], [15] and Gabelman [4]. The basic conditions are the k-monotonicities and have been used not only to recognize threshold functions but also to determine realizing weights and threshold. Richard Wesley Hamming, Wanda L. Mammel |
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 2 |