Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Todd Shore

dblp:124/9131 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 56% Question answering and dialogue systems · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
reference resolution
0.312018
Using lexical alignment and referring ability to address data sparsity in situated dialog reference resolution · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue
situated dialogue
0.312018
Using lexical alignment and referring ability to address data sparsity in situated dialog reference resolution · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics
0.112018
Using lexical alignment and referring ability to address data sparsity in situated dialog reference resolution · EMNLP 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

words-as-classifiers · 0.3logistic regression · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Using lexical alignment and referring ability to address data sparsity in situated dialog reference resolution
abstract
Referring to entities in situated dialog is a collaborative process, whereby interlocutors often expand, repair and/or replace referring expressions in an iterative process, converging on conceptual pacts of referring language use in doing so.Nevertheless, much work on exophoric reference resolution (i.e.resolution of references to entities outside of a given text) follows a literary model, whereby individual referring expressions are interpreted as unique identifiers of their referents given the state of the dialog the referring expression is initiated.In this paper, we address this collaborative nature to improve dialogic reference resolution in two ways: First, we trained a words-asclassifiers logistic regression model of word semantics and incrementally adapt the model to idiosyncratic language between dyad partners during evaluation of the dialog.We then used these semantic models to learn the general referring ability of each word, which is independent of referent features.These methods facilitate accurate automatic reference resolution in situated dialog without annotation of referring expressions, even with little background data.
Todd Shore, Gabriel Skantze
EMNLP1
2018 FARMI: A FrAmework for Recording Multi-Modal Interactions
Patrik Jonell, Mattias Bystedt, Per Fallgren, Dimosthenis Kontogiorgos, José Lopes 0001, Zofia Malisz, Samuel Mascarenhas, Catharine Oertel, Eran Raveh, Todd Shore
LREC10
2018 KTH Tangrams: A Dataset for Research on Alignment and Conceptual Pacts in Task-Oriented Dialogue
Todd Shore, Theofronia Androulakaki, Gabriel Skantze
LREC1
2012 Knowledge-Based Word Lattice Rescoring in a Dynamic Context
abstract
Recent advances in automatic speech recognition (ASR) technology continue to be based heavily on data-driven methods, meaning that the full benefits of such research are often not enjoyed in domains for which there is little training data. Moreover, tractability is often an issue with these methods when conditioning for long-distance dependencies, entailing that many higher-level knowledge sources such as situational knowledge cannot be easily utilized in classification. This paper describes an effort to circumvent this problem by using dynamic contextual knowledge to rescore ASR lattice output using a dynamic weighted constraint satisfaction function. With this method, it was possible to achieve a roughly 80 % reduction in WER for ASR in the context of an air traffic control scenario. Index Terms: lattice rescoring, knowledge-based, contextsensitivity 1.
Todd Shore, Friedrich Faubel, Hartmut Helmke, Dietrich Klakow
INTERSPEECH1