Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre E. Jacob

dblp:125/2114 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 40% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 35% Learning theory · 20%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
concentration of measure
0.512021
Fast Approximation of the Sliced-Wasserstein Distance Using Concentration of Random Projections · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.512021
Fast Approximation of the Sliced-Wasserstein Distance Using Concentration of Random Projections · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
sliced wasserstein distance
0.512021
Fast Approximation of the Sliced-Wasserstein Distance Using Concentration of Random Projections · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
convergence diagnostics
0.412019
Estimating Convergence of Markov chains with L-Lag Couplings · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.412019
Estimating Convergence of Markov chains with L-Lag Couplings · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model evaluation
0.112021
Fast Approximation of the Sliced-Wasserstein Distance Using Concentration of Random Projections · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo
0.112019
Estimating Convergence of Markov chains with L-Lag Couplings · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

concentration of random projections · 0.5wasserstein distance · 0.4total variation · 0.4l-lag coupling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Fast Approximation of the Sliced-Wasserstein Distance Using Concentration of Random Projections
abstract
The Sliced-Wasserstein distance (SW) is being increasingly used in machine learning applications as an alternative to the Wasserstein distance and offers significant computational and statistical benefits. Since it is defined as an expectation over random projections, SW is commonly approximated by Monte Carlo. We adopt a new perspective to approximate SW by making use of the concentration of measure phenomenon: under mild assumptions, one-dimensional projections of a high-dimensional random vector are approximately Gaussian. Based on this observation, we develop a simple deterministic approximation for SW. Our method does not require sampling a number of random projections, and is therefore both accurate and easy to use compared to the usual Monte Carlo approximation. We derive nonasymptotical guarantees for our approach, and show that the approximation error goes to zero as the dimension increases, under a weak dependence condition on the data distribution. We validate our theoretical findings on synthetic datasets, and illustrate the proposed approximation on a generative modeling problem.
Kimia Nadjahi, Alain Durmus, Pierre E. Jacob, Roland Badeau, Umut Simsekli
NeurIPS3
2019 Clustering Time Series with Nonlinear Dynamics: A Bayesian Non-Parametric and Particle-Based Approach
abstract
We propose a general statistical framework for clustering multiple time series that exhibit nonlinear dynamics into an a-priori-unknown number of sub-groups. Our motivation comes from neuroscience, where an important problem is to identify, within a large assembly of neurons, subsets that respond similarly to a stimulus or contingency. Upon modeling the multiple time series as the output of a Dirichlet process mixture of nonlinear state-space models, we derive a Metropolis-within-Gibbs algorithm for full Bayesian inference that alternates between sampling cluster assignments and sampling parameter values that form the basis of the clustering. The Metropolis step employs recent innovations in particle-based methods. We apply the framework to clustering time series acquired from the prefrontal cortex of mice in an experiment designed to characterize the neural underpinnings of fear.
Alexander Lin, Yingzhuo Zhang, Jeremy Heng, Stephen A. Allsop, Kay Tye, Pierre E. Jacob, Demba Ba 0001
AISTATS6
2019 Unbiased Smoothing using Particle Independent Metropolis-Hastings
abstract
We consider the approximation of expectations with respect to the distribution of a latent Markov process given noisy measurements. This is known as the smoothing problem and is often approached with particle and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. These methods provide consistent but biased estimators when run for a finite time. We propose a simple way of coupling two MCMC chains built using Particle Independent Metropolis-Hastings (PIMH) to produce unbiased smoothing estimators. Unbiased estimators are appealing in the context of parallel computing, and facilitate the construction of confidence intervals. The proposed scheme only requires access to off-the-shelf Particle Filters (PF) and is thus easier to implement than recently proposed unbiased smoothers. The approach is demonstrated on a Lévy-driven stochastic volatility model and a stochastic kinetic model.
Lawrece Middleton, George Deligiannidis, Arnaud Doucet, Pierre E. Jacob
AISTATS4
2019 Estimating Convergence of Markov chains with L-Lag Couplings
abstract
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods generate samples that are asymptotically distributed from a target distribution of interest as the number of iterations goes to infinity. Various theoretical results provide upper bounds on the distance between the target and marginal distribution after a fixed number of iterations. These upper bounds are on a case by case basis and typically involve intractable quantities, which limits their use for practitioners. We introduce L-lag couplings to generate computable, non-asymptotic upper bound estimates for the total variation or the Wasserstein distance of general Markov chains. We apply L-lag couplings to the tasks of (i) determining MCMC burn-in, (ii) comparing different MCMC algorithms with the same target, and (iii) comparing exact and approximate MCMC. Lastly, we (iv) assess the bias of sequential Monte Carlo and self-normalized importance samplers.
Niloy Biswas, Pierre E. Jacob, Paul Vanetti
NeurIPS2