Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Federica Panella

dblp:125/2234 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 61% Automata and formal languages · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science › model theory
logical characterization
0.212015
Operator Precedence Languages: Their Automata-Theoretic and Logic Characterization · SIAM J. Comput. 2015
Logic in computer science
monadic second-order logic
0.212015
Operator Precedence Languages: Their Automata-Theoretic and Logic Characterization · SIAM J. Comput. 2015
Automata and formal languages › context-free languages
operator precedence languages
0.212015
Operator Precedence Languages: Their Automata-Theoretic and Logic Characterization · SIAM J. Comput. 2015
Automata and formal languages › infinite words
omega-regular languages
0.112015
Operator Precedence Languages: Their Automata-Theoretic and Logic Characterization · SIAM J. Comput. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model checking · 0.2automata-theoretic characterization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Parallel parsing made practical
Alessandro Barenghi, Stefano Crespi-Reghizzi, Dino Mandrioli, Federica Panella, Matteo Pradella
Sci. Comput. Program.4
2015 Operator Precedence Languages: Their Automata-Theoretic and Logic Characterization
abstract
Operator precedence languages were introduced half a century ago by Robert Floyd to support deterministic and efficient parsing of context-free languages. Recently, we renewed our interest in this class of languages thanks to a few distinguishing properties that make them attractive for exploiting various modern technologies. Precisely, their local parsability enables parallel and incremental parsing, whereas their closure properties make them amenable to automatic verification techniques, including model checking. In this paper we provide a fairly complete theory of this class of languages: we introduce a class of automata with the same recognizing power as the generative power of their grammars; we provide a characterization of their sentences in terms of monadic second-order logic as has been done in previous literature for more restricted language classes such as regular, parenthesis, and input-driven ones; we investigate preserved and lost properties when extending the language sentences from finite length to infinite length ($\omega$-languages). As a result, we obtain a class of languages that enjoys many of the nice properties of regular languages (closure and decidability properties, logic characterization) but is considerably larger than other families---typically parenthesis and input-driven ones---with the same properties, covering “almost” all deterministic languages.
Violetta Lonati, Dino Mandrioli, Federica Panella, Matteo Pradella
SIAM J. Comput.3
2014 The PAPAGENO Parallel-Parser Generator
Alessandro Barenghi, Stefano Crespi-Reghizzi, Dino Mandrioli, Federica Panella, Matteo Pradella
CC4
2013 Operator Precedence ω-Languages
Federica Panella, Matteo Pradella, Violetta Lonati, Dino Mandrioli
Developments in Language Theory1