Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Walter Parks Goodwin

dblp:125/2401 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › sorting
parallel sorting
0.011989
Implementing parallel sorting algorithms on a linear array of transputers · SC 1989
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
linear array processors
0.011989
Implementing parallel sorting algorithms on a linear array of transputers · SC 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

message passing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Implementing parallel sorting algorithms on a linear array of transputers
abstract
This paper presents experimental results on a linear array of transputers for three parallel sorting algorithms, odd-even transposition sort, weavesort, and pipelined-merge sort. Though a significant amount of message communication is usually required for implementing sorting algorithms on any linear array of processors, in our experiments it is observed that the actual time spent for this is not a major overhead. This is because of the high communication bandwidth provided by the transputer system. Each of the three algorithms are described in a high-level parallel language. The number of message communications and merging complexities of these algorithms are analyzed and compared. We plot performance parameters, including parallel time complexities and resulting speedups, as functions of the number of processors used and the number of elements to be sorted.
Walter Parks Goodwin, Sajal K. Das 0001
SC1