Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tobias Michaels

dblp:125/2441 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Embedded and real-time systems · 80% Electronic design automation · 20%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.322013
Monitoring of Workload Arrival Functions for Mixed-Criticality Systems · RTSS 2013
Monitoring Arbitrary Activation Patterns in Real-Time Systems · RTSS 2012
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › mixed-criticality scheduling
mixed-criticality systems
0.212013
Monitoring of Workload Arrival Functions for Mixed-Criticality Systems · RTSS 2013
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
timing verification
0.112012
Monitoring Arbitrary Activation Patterns in Real-Time Systems · RTSS 2012
Embedded and real-time systems › critical systems
safety-critical systems
0.122013
Monitoring of Workload Arrival Functions for Mixed-Criticality Systems · RTSS 2013
Monitoring Arbitrary Activation Patterns in Real-Time Systems · RTSS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monitoring · 0.2minimum distance event representation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Sensitivity analysis for arbitrary activation patterns in real-time systems
abstract
Response time analysis, which determines whether timing guarantees are satisfied for a given system, has matured to industrial practice and is able to consider even complex activation patterns modelled through arrival curves or minimum distance functions. On the other side, sensitivity analysis, which determines bounds on parameter variations under which constraints are still satisfied, is largely restricted to variation of single-valued parameters as e.g. task periods. In this paper we provide a sensitivity analysis to determine the bounds on the admissible activation pattern of a task, modelled through a minimum distance function. In an evaluation on a set of synthetic testcases we show, that the proposed algorithm provides significantly tighter bounds, than previous exact analyses, that determine allowable parametrizations of activation patterns.
Moritz Neukirchner, Sophie Quinton, Tobias Michaels, Philip Axer, Rolf Ernst
DATE3
2013 Monitoring of Workload Arrival Functions for Mixed-Criticality Systems
abstract
Integrating applications with different safety requirements on a common platform requires either certification of all applications to the highest safety level or "sufficient independence" among them. As the former typically is too costly, isolation mechanisms, such as monitoring, are key in the design of mixed-criticality systems. We regard monitoring of activation patterns of real-time applications in mixed-criticality systems. Existing solutions monitor single tasks in isolation. We present a monitoring scheme which allows to monitor groups of tasks jointly. It allows to express correlations between activations and provides improved resource utilization as no isolation between tasks in a group is enforced.
Moritz Neukirchner, Philip Axer, Tobias Michaels, Rolf Ernst
RTSS3
2012 Monitoring Arbitrary Activation Patterns in Real-Time Systems
abstract
Model-based verification of timing properties has become industrial practice in design processes of safety-critical hard real-time systems. To validate the correctness of the used verification model, systems are additionally monitored during regular operation. With a growing variety of activation patterns considered in verification, some of them with infinite range capturing arbitrary activation patterns, the known approaches to monitoring, which assume periodic streams, have become inapplicable or they suffer from large overhead due to piecewise continuous time monitoring. In this paper we present a light-weight monitoring approach for arbitrary activation patterns. It profits from the discrete time property of a minimum distance event representation which is used instead of the continuous time representation used in earlier approaches. The method has a configurable constant runtime overhead in terms of memory and computation and allows conservative monitoring of a given arbitrary minimum distance function. Furthermore, we provide conditions under which the monitoring function is exact.
Moritz Neukirchner, Tobias Michaels, Philip Axer, Sophie Quinton, Rolf Ernst
RTSS2