Monadic decomposibility - the ability to determine whether a formula in a given logical theory can be decomposed into a boolean combination of monadic formulas - is a powerful tool for devising a decision procedure for a given logical theory. In this paper, we revisit a classical decision problem in automata theory: given a regular (a.k.a. synchronized rational) relation, determine whether it is recognizable, i.e., it has a monadic decomposition (that is, a representation as a boolean combination of cartesian products of regular languages). Regular relations are expressive formalisms which, using an appropriate string encoding, can capture relations definable in Presburger Arithmetic. In fact, their expressive power coincide with relations definable in a universal automatic structure; equivalently, those definable by finite set interpretations in WS1S (Weak Second Order Theory of One Successor). Determining whether a regular relation admits a recognizable relation was known to be decidable (and in exponential time for binary relations), but its precise complexity still hitherto remains open. Our main contribution is to fully settle the complexity of this decision problem by developing new techniques employing infinite Ramsey theory. The complexity for DFA (resp. NFA) representations of regular relations is shown to be NLOGSPACE-complete (resp. PSPACE-complete).

Resource sharing is a fundamental phenomenon in concurrent programming where several threads have permissions to access a common resource. Logics for verification need to capture the notion of permission ownership and transfer. One typical practice is the use of rational numbers in (0, 1] as permissions in which 1 is the full permission and the rest are fractional permissions. Rational permissions are not a good fit for separation logic because they remove the essential “disjointness” feature of the logic itself. We propose a general logic framework that supports permission reasoning in separation logic while preserving disjointness. Our framework is applicable to sophisticated verification tasks such as doing induction over the finiteness of the heap within the object logic or carrying out biabductive inference. We can also prove precision of recursive predicates within the object logic. We developed the ShareInfer tool to benchmark our techniques. We introduce “scaling separation algebras,” a compositional extension of separation algebras, to model our logic, and use them to construct a concrete model.

Fractional share models are used to reason about how multiple actors share ownership of resources. We examine the decidability and complexity of reasoning over the "tree share" model of Dockins et al. using first-order logic, or fragments thereof. We pinpoint a connection between the basic operations on trees union, intersection, and complement and countable atomless Boolean algebras, allowing us to obtain decidability with the precise complexity of both first-order and existential theories over the tree share model with the aforementioned operations. We establish a connection between the multiplication operation on trees and the theory of word equations, allowing us to derive the decidability of its existential theory and the undecidability of its full first-order theory. We prove that the full first-order theory over the model with both the Boolean operations and the restricted multiplication operation (with constants on the right hand side) is decidable via an embedding to tree-automatic structures.