Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nilotpal Sanyal
dblp:125/4515
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-4814-7602ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | GWASinlps: non-local prior based iterative SNP selection tool for genome-wide association studies · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › single nucleotide polymorphism analysis
SNP selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | GWASinlps: non-local prior based iterative SNP selection tool for genome-wide association studies · Bioinform. 2019 |
Computational science and engineering › model selection
variable selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | GWASinlps: non-local prior based iterative SNP selection tool for genome-wide association studies · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
screen-and-select · 0.4non-local priors · 0.4bayesian variable selection · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | GWASinlps: non-local prior based iterative SNP selection tool for genome-wide association studiesabstractMotivation: Multiple marker analysis of the genome-wide association study (GWAS) data has gained ample attention in recent years. However, because of the ultra high-dimensionality of GWAS data, such analysis is challenging. Frequently used penalized regression methods often lead to large number of false positives, whereas Bayesian methods are computationally very expensive. Motivated to ameliorate these issues simultaneously, we consider the novel approach of using non-local priors in an iterative variable selection framework. Results: We develop a variable selection method, named, iterative non-local prior based selection for GWAS, or GWASinlps, that combines, in an iterative variable selection framework, the computational efficiency of the screen-and-select approach based on some association learning and the parsimonious uncertainty quantification provided by the use of non-local priors. The hallmark of our method is the introduction of 'structured screen-and-select' strategy, that considers hierarchical screening, which is not only based on response-predictor associations, but also based on response-response associations and concatenates variable selection within that hierarchy. Extensive simulation studies with single nucleotide polymorphisms having realistic linkage disequilibrium structures demonstrate the advantages of our computationally efficient method compared to several frequentist and Bayesian variable selection methods, in terms of true positive rate, false discovery rate, mean squared error and effect size estimation error. Further, we provide empirical power analysis useful for study design. Finally, a real GWAS data application was considered with human height as phenotype. Availability and implementation: An R-package for implementing the GWASinlps method is available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GWASinlps/index.html. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Nilotpal Sanyal, Min-Tzu Lo, Karolina Kauppi, Srdjan Djurovic, Ole A. Andreassen, Valen E. Johnson |
Bioinform. | 1 |