EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jose Miguel Pasini
dblp:125/5555
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% Quantum computing and quantum information · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking
model counting |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Estimating the Density of States of Boolean Satisfiability Problems on Classical and Quantum Computing Platforms · AAAI 2020 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computational models
quantum annealing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Estimating the Density of States of Boolean Satisfiability Problems on Classical and Quantum Computing Platforms · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantum annealing · 0.4concentration of measure · 0.4SMT solvers · 0.4QUBO · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Estimating the Density of States of Boolean Satisfiability Problems on Classical and Quantum Computing PlatformsabstractGiven a Boolean formula ϕ(x) in conjunctive normal form (CNF), the density of states counts the number of variable assignments that violate exactly e clauses, for all values of e. Thus, the density of states is a histogram of the number of unsatisfied clauses over all possible assignments. This computation generalizes both maximum-satisfiability (MAX-SAT) and model counting problems and not only provides insight into the entire solution space, but also yields a measure for the hardness of the problem instance. Consequently, in real-world scenarios, this problem is typically infeasible even when using state-of-the-art algorithms. While finding an exact answer to this problem is a computationally intensive task, we propose a novel approach for estimating density of states based on the concentration of measure inequalities. The methodology results in a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO), which is particularly amenable to quantum annealing-based solutions. We present the overall approach and compare results from the D-Wave quantum annealer against the best-known classical algorithms such as the Hamze-de Freitas-Selby (HFS) algorithm and satisfiability modulo theory (SMT) solvers. Tuhin Sahai, Jose Miguel Pasini, Susmit Jha |
AAAI | 3 |