Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Weiwei Chu

dblp:125/6028 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8356-1054ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 87% Language models and text generation · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
High-performance computing · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
1.722025
WLB-LLM: Workload-Balanced 4D Parallelism for Large Language Model Training · OSDI 2025
Scaling Llama 3 Training with Efficient Parallelism Strategies · ISCA 2025
High-performance computing
large-scale training
0.912025
Scaling Llama 3 Training with Efficient Parallelism Strategies · ISCA 2025
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel machine learning
parallel training
0.912025
WLB-LLM: Workload-Balanced 4D Parallelism for Large Language Model Training · OSDI 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
large language model pretraining
0.312025
Scaling Llama 3 Training with Efficient Parallelism Strategies · ISCA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tensor parallelism · 1.7pipeline parallelism · 1.7fully sharded data parallelism · 1.7context parallelism · 1.74d parallelism · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Scaling Llama 3 Training with Efficient Parallelism Strategies
abstract
Llama is a widely used open-source large language model.This paper presents the design and implementation of the parallelism techniques used in Llama 3 pre-training.To achieve efficient training on tens of thousands of GPUs, Llama 3 employs a combination of four-dimensional parallelism: fully sharded data parallelism, tensor parallelism, pipeline parallelism, and context parallelism.Beyond achieving efficiency through parallelism and model co-design, we
Weiwei Chu, Xinfeng Xie, Jiecao Yu, Jie Wang 0022, Amar Phanishayee, Chunqiang Tang, Yuchen Hao, Muhammet Mustafa Ozdal, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal 0001, Abhishek Kadian, Andrew Gu, Chris Cai, Xiaodong Wang 0020, Min Si, Pavan Balaji, Ching-Hsiang Chu, Jongsoo Park
ISCA1
2025 WLB-LLM: Workload-Balanced 4D Parallelism for Large Language Model Training
Zheng Wang 0075, Anna Cai, Xinfeng Xie, Zaifeng Pan, Yue Guan 0003, Weiwei Chu, Jie Wang 0022, Shikai Li, Chris Cai, Yuchen Hao, Yufei Ding 0001
OSDI6
2014 N-CANDA data integration: anatomy of an asynchronous infrastructure for multi-site, multi-instrument longitudinal data capture
abstract
The infrastructure for data collection implemented by the National Consortium on Alcohol and NeuroDevelopment in Adolescence (N-CANDA) for data collection comprises several innovative features: (a) secure, asynchronous transfer and persistent storage of collected data via a revision control system; (b) two-stage import into a longitudinal database; and (c) use of a script-controlled web browser for data retrieval from a third-party, web-based neuropsychological test battery. The asynchronous operation of data transmission and import is of particular benefit, as it has allowed the consortium sites to begin data collection before the receiving database infrastructure had been deployed. Records were collected within 86 days of funding, 35 days after finalizing the collected instruments. Final instruments were added to the database import 225 days after instrument selection, with up to 173 records already collected at that time. Thus, the concepts implemented in N-CANDA's data collection system helped reduce project start-up time by several months.
Torsten Rohlfing, Kevin Cummins, Trevor Henthorn, Weiwei Chu, B. Nolan Nichols
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.4