Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Philipp Kaiser

dblp:126/0930 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 87% Program analysis · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
integration testing
0.112012
Integration testing of protocol implementations using symbolic distributed execution · ICNP 2012
Software testing
protocol testing
0.112012
Integration testing of protocol implementations using symbolic distributed execution · ICNP 2012
Program analysis
symbolic execution
0.012012
Integration testing of protocol implementations using symbolic distributed execution · ICNP 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic execution · 0.1distributed execution · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Integration testing of protocol implementations using symbolic distributed execution
abstract
Automatism and high-coverage are the core challenges in testing communication protocols in their early development phase. Ideally, the testing process should cope with a large input space, several sources of non-determinism, and heterogeneous operating environments to effectively explore the emerging execution paths. In practice, however, the missing tool support imposes a huge amount of manual effort to perform integrated conformance and interoperability testing of protocol implementations. In this paper, we first detail on the protocol testing issues, such as low coverage, missing code and automation, we experienced during the lifetime of an university-industry project. Second, we present SymNet, an integrated testing environment which targets the latter limitations using state-of-the-art symbolic execution techniques. Our approach is to interconnect several virtual machines, execute each of them using selective symbolic execution, and centrally coordinate the emerging distributed execution paths. The key challenges are the synchronization of distributed constraints, detection of false positives, and pruning of redundant execution states. We detail on SymNet architecture, show its applicability to real-world protocol software, and discuss future research directions.
Raimondas Sasnauskas, Philipp Kaiser, Russ Lucas Jukic, Klaus Wehrle
ICNP2