Robert Gens

dblp:126/1695 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 82% Deep learning architectures and training · 9% Speech recognition and synthesis · 7%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › tractable probabilistic model
sum-product networks
0.632017
On the Latent Variable Interpretation in Sum-Product Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017
Learning the Structure of Sum-Product Networks · ICML (3) 2013
Discriminative Learning of Sum-Product Networks · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.522017
On the Latent Variable Interpretation in Sum-Product Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017
Learning the Structure of Sum-Product Networks · ICML (3) 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.312017
On the Latent Variable Interpretation in Sum-Product Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
group equivariant neural network
0.212014
Deep Symmetry Networks · NIPS 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning
0.212013
Learning the Structure of Sum-Product Networks · ICML (3) 2013
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › acoustic model training
discriminative training
0.112012
Discriminative Learning of Sum-Product Networks · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
tractable inference
0.112012
Discriminative Learning of Sum-Product Networks · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization
0.112017
On the Latent Variable Interpretation in Sum-Product Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.012012
Discriminative Learning of Sum-Product Networks · NIPS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expectation-maximization · 0.3Viterbi-style MPE inference · 0.3gradient descent · 0.1backpropagation · 0.1MPE inference · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 On the Latent Variable Interpretation in Sum-Product Networks
abstract
One of the central themes in Sum-Product networks (SPNs) is the interpretation of sum nodes as marginalized latent variables (LVs). This interpretation yields an increased syntactic or semantic structure, allows the application of the EM algorithm and to efficiently perform MPE inference. In literature, the LV interpretation was justified by explicitly introducing the indicator variables corresponding to the LVs' states. However, as pointed out in this paper, this approach is in conflict with the completeness condition in SPNs and does not fully specify the probabilistic model. We propose a remedy for this problem by modifying the original approach for introducing the LVs, which we call SPN augmentation. We discuss conditional independencies in augmented SPNs, formally establish the probabilistic interpretation of the sum-weights and give an interpretation of augmented SPNs as Bayesian networks. Based on these results, we find a sound derivation of the EM algorithm for SPNs. Furthermore, the Viterbi-style algorithm for MPE proposed in literature was never proven to be correct. We show that this is indeed a correct algorithm, when applied to selective SPNs, and in particular when applied to augmented SPNs. Our theoretical results are confirmed in experiments on synthetic data and 103 real-world datasets.
Robert Peharz, Robert Gens, Franz Pernkopf, Pedro M. Domingos
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2014 Deep Symmetry Networks
Robert Gens, Pedro M. Domingos
NIPS1
2013 Learning the Structure of Sum-Product Networks
abstract
Sum-product networks (SPNs) are a new class of deep probabilistic models. SPNs can have unbounded treewidth but inference in them is always tractable. An SPN is either a univariate distribution, a product of SPNs over disjoint variables, or a weighted sum of SPNs over the same variables. We propose the first algorithm for learning the structure of SPNs that takes full advantage of their expressiveness. At each step, the algorithm attempts to divide the current variables into approximately independent subsets. If successful, it returns the product of recursive calls on the subsets; otherwise it returns the sum of recursive calls on subsets of similar instances from the current training set. A comprehensive empirical study shows that the learned SPNs are typically comparable to graphical models in likelihood but superior in inference speed and accuracy.
Robert Gens, Pedro M. Domingos
ICML (3)1
2012 Discriminative Learning of Sum-Product Networks
abstract
Sum-product networks are a new deep architecture that can perform fast, exact in- ference on high-treewidth models. Only generative methods for training SPNs have been proposed to date. In this paper, we present the first discriminative training algorithms for SPNs, combining the high accuracy of the former with the representational power and tractability of the latter. We show that the class of tractable discriminative SPNs is broader than the class of tractable generative ones, and propose an efficient backpropagation-style algorithm for computing the gradient of the conditional log likelihood. Standard gradient descent suffers from the diffusion problem, but networks with many layers can be learned reliably us- ing “hard” gradient descent, where marginal inference is replaced by MPE infer- ence (i.e., inferring the most probable state of the non-evidence variables). The resulting updates have a simple and intuitive form. We test discriminative SPNs on standard image classification tasks. We obtain the best results to date on the CIFAR-10 dataset, using fewer features than prior methods with an SPN architec- ture that learns local image structure discriminatively. We also report the highest published test accuracy on STL-10 even though we only use the labeled portion of the dataset.
Robert Gens, Pedro M. Domingos
NIPS1