Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oliver Keyes

dblp:126/1845 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 77% Information retrieval · 23%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and social media mining
web analytics
0.212015
User Session Identification Based on Strong Regularities in Inter-activity Time · WWW 2015
Empirical software engineering
user behavior analysis
0.212015
User Session Identification Based on Strong Regularities in Inter-activity Time · WWW 2015
Collaborative and social computing › cooperative work
open collaboration
0.212013
Making peripheral participation legitimate: reader engagement experiments in wikipedia · CSCW 2013
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
peripheral participation
0.212013
Making peripheral participation legitimate: reader engagement experiments in wikipedia · CSCW 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal rhythm analysis · 0.4clustering · 0.4social learning theory · 0.2field experiment · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 User Session Identification Based on Strong Regularities in Inter-activity Time
abstract
Session identification is a common strategy used to develop metrics for web analytics and perform behavioral analyses of user-facing systems. Past work has argued that session identification strategies based on an inactivity threshold is inherently arbitrary or has advocated that thresholds be set at about 30 minutes. In this work, we demonstrate a strong regularity in the temporal rhythms of user initiated events across several different domains of online activity (incl. video gaming, search, page views and volunteer contributions). We describe a methodology for identifying clusters of user activity and argue that the regularity with which these activity clusters appear implies a good rule-of-thumb inactivity threshold of about 1 hour. We conclude with implications that these temporal rhythms may have for system design based on our observations and theories of goal-directed human activity.
Aaron Halfaker, Oliver Keyes, Daniel Kluver, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Tien T. Nguyen, Kenneth Shores, Anuradha Uduwage, Morten Warncke-Wang
WWW2
2013 Making peripheral participation legitimate: reader engagement experiments in wikipedia
abstract
Open collaboration communities thrive when participation is plentiful. Recent research has shown that the English Wikipedia community has constructed a vast and accurate information resource primarily through the monumental effort of a relatively small number of active, volunteer editors. Beyond Wikipedia's active editor community is a substantially larger pool of potential participants: readers. In this paper we describe a set of field experiments using the Article Feedback Tool, a system designed to elicit lightweight contributions from Wikipedia's readers. Through the lens of social learning theory and comparisons to related work in open bug tracking software, we evaluate the costs and benefits of the expanded participation model and show both qualitatively and quantitatively that peripheral contributors add value to an open collaboration community as long as the cost of identifying low quality contributions remains low.
Aaron Halfaker, Oliver Keyes, Dario Taraborelli
CSCW2