William C. Dickson

dblp:126/2628 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 56% Multi-agent systems · 41% Robot manipulation · 3%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-robot coordination
cooperative object manipulation
0.021997
A decentralized object impedance controller for object/robot-team systems: theory and experiments · ICRA 1997
Symbolic dynamic modelling and analysis of object/robot-team systems with experiments · ICRA 1996
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot coordination
0.021997
A decentralized object impedance controller for object/robot-team systems: theory and experiments · ICRA 1997
Symbolic dynamic modelling and analysis of object/robot-team systems with experiments · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.021997
A decentralized object impedance controller for object/robot-team systems: theory and experiments · ICRA 1997
Symbolic dynamic modelling and analysis of object/robot-team systems with experiments · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › multi-robot control
decentralized control
0.011997
A decentralized object impedance controller for object/robot-team systems: theory and experiments · ICRA 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › force control
object impedance control
0.011997
A decentralized object impedance controller for object/robot-team systems: theory and experiments · ICRA 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › dynamic modeling
symbolic dynamic modeling
0.011996
Symbolic dynamic modelling and analysis of object/robot-team systems with experiments · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
manipulator control
0.011997
A decentralized object impedance controller for object/robot-team systems: theory and experiments · ICRA 1997
Robotics › Robot manipulation
cooperative manipulation
0.011996
Symbolic dynamic modelling and analysis of object/robot-team systems with experiments · ICRA 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stability analysis · 0.0decentralized object impedance controller · 0.0symbolic dynamic modeling · 0.0physical experiments · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 A decentralized object impedance controller for object/robot-team systems: theory and experiments
abstract
This paper derives a decentralized object impedance controller (DOIC) especially suited for use by a team of robots and/or multiple manipulators. In contrast to the original object impedance controller (OIC), a separate DOIC operates on each robot to provide local computation of the manipulator force commands, thus removing the need for expensive high-bandwidth communication of force signals between the robots. The key advance of the DOIC that provides this benefit is a decentralized algorithm for estimating the external force on the object. This paper derives the DOIC, provides stability analysis, and verifies the theory with definitive physical experiments.
William C. Dickson, Robert H. Cannon Jr., Stephen M. Rock
ICRA1
1996 Symbolic dynamic modelling and analysis of object/robot-team systems with experiments
abstract
This paper presents an approach for the symbolic dynamic modelling of object/robot-team systems composed of an object manipulated by a team of r robots. The modelling approach merges the dynamic models of the object and robots into a system model. Derivations show that the system acceleration can be computed with complexity proportional to r. This paper demonstrates in a detailed example with physical experiments how the modelling approach can be used for symbolic analysis of a closed-loop object/robot-team system.
William C. Dickson, Robert H. Cannon Jr., Stephen M. Rock
ICRA1
1995 Experimental results of two free-flying robots capturing and manipulating a free-flying object
abstract
This paper presents the results of laboratory experiments performed at the Aerospace Robotics Laboratory (ARL) at Stanford University from 1987 to 1993 that successfully demonstrate a team, of two-armed free-flying robots capturing, transporting, and docking a large, freely moving object. In these experiments, the object and robots float on a thin cushion of air over a granite surface plate, simulating with high fidelity in two dimensions the drag-free, zero-gravity conditions of space. A human user indicates a desired object location and orientation through a graphical user interface. The self-propelled robots then capture and so position the object, with no additional input required from the user: the human is at the task-defining level. On command, the robot team docks the captured object with a stationary second object. The paper discusses the experimental facility, the control hierarchy that supports object-based task-level control, and the controllers for the object and robots. Experimental results are then presented for the capture, transportation, and docking of the object.
William C. Dickson, Robert H. Cannon Jr.
IROS (2)1