Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

A. Suraj

dblp:126/2730 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 56% Requirements engineering and software design · 44%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.011997
An approach for monitoring and control of agent-based systems · ICRA 1997
Program analysis › concurrent system analysis
petri net analysis
0.011997
An approach for monitoring and control of agent-based systems · ICRA 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

petri net analysis · 0.0extended statecharts · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 An approach for monitoring and control of agent-based systems
abstract
Finite state machines and their extensions are widely used for system modeling and analysis. Often, the models themselves do not provide much insight into critical system areas which need to be observed (or monitored) for effective control. The issue is mostly left to the discretion of the development team which often has limited domain knowledge. In this paper, an effective method to identify necessary critical system areas that need to be observed and those areas that lead example to the identification of varying levels of control in a design model are discussed. Also, the applicability of this method in differentiating and choosing between two similar system designs is discussed. Extended Statecharts (ESCs) that exploit the XOR configuration of Statecharts for system failure modeling are used for developing the high level system model. The ESC model is subsequently transformed into a high level Petri net model and Petri net analysis techniques are used for the identification of critical system areas for observation and control as well as to differentiate between nearly identical ESC system models.
Srini Ramaswamy, A. Suraj, K. Suzanne Barber
ICRA2