Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neelesh Kumar Jain 0001

dblp:126/2780 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1168-0617ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational fabrication · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational fabrication › process planning
computer-aided process planning
0.011997
A feature-less approach to process planning · ICRA 1997
Computational fabrication
process planning
0.011997
A feature-less approach to process planning · ICRA 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tool accessibility analysis · 0.0feature recognition · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 YOLO-based in-situ Defect Monitoring System for Additive Manufacturing
abstract
In-situ monitoring of an Additive Manufacturing (AM) process is the way to enhance the quality of the components manufactured by it. However, the metal AM processes are complex to monitor because of usage of high energy-based heat source in melting the deposition material, particularly in the arc-based AM processes where arc and sparks make it difficult to capture the deposition. This paper explores the use of a High Dynamic Range (HDR) camera to capture and monitor deposition processes for μ-Plasma Transferred Arc Additive Manufacturing (μP-TAAM) process. Additionally, it proposes the YOLO-based object detection model to assess and monitor the quality of Co-Cr-Mo-4Ti depositions. The research focuses on analysing the performance of YOLOv8l, YOLOv9t, YOLOv9s, YOLOv9m and YOLOv10n models to detect and classify good and bad depositions. It has been found that YOLIv9m gave a strong balance across all evaluation metrics such as highest Recall of 0.983, high precision of 0.98, high mAP50 of 0.994 and high mAP50-95 of 0.848. These findings underscore the model's potential for deployment in in-situ monitoring scenarios.
Deepika Nikam, Maxime Hudon, Sonya A. Coleman, Dermot Kerr, Neelesh Kumar Jain 0001, Sagar Nikam
INDIN5
1997 A feature-less approach to process planning
abstract
Feature-driven CAPP is the dominant model for computer-aided process planning today. Despite more than a decade of effort, there are no general methods for defining or identifying features, and consequently CAPP approaches in full generality could not been developed. An alternative to feature-driven CAPP is direct tool access-based models for process planning, which rely on the fundamental geometric information in the CAD model to develop the process plan. In this paper we check the accessibility of part surfaces from different tool access directions, and use this to generate the process plan for rotational parts (turning) and for milling. Features are still useful, especially for communicating with the shop floor user, the part faces are clustered into features for the purpose of process detailing. Thus features may be seen as being driven by the process plan and not the other way round.
Amitabha Mukerjee, Neelesh Kumar Jain 0001
ICRA2