Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xuemei Shan

dblp:126/2829 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-0718-5116ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 70% Robot manipulation · 30%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning › data-driven control
koopman-based control
0.912025
Multi-Segment Soft Robot Control Via Deep Koopman-Based Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.912025
Multi-Segment Soft Robot Control Via Deep Koopman-Based Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation › soft robotics
soft robot control
0.912025
Multi-Segment Soft Robot Control Via Deep Koopman-Based Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking
0.912025
Multi-Segment Soft Robot Control Via Deep Koopman-Based Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation
soft robotics
0.312025
Multi-Segment Soft Robot Control Via Deep Koopman-Based Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model predictive control · 0.9koopman operator · 0.9deep learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Multi-Segment Soft Robot Control Via Deep Koopman-Based Model Predictive Control
abstract
Soft robots, compared to regular rigid robots, as their multiple segments with soft materials bring flexibility and compliance, have the advantages of safe interaction and dexterous operation in the environment. However, due to its characteristics of high dimensional, nonlinearity, time-varying nature, and infinite degree of freedom, it has been challenges in achieving precise and dynamic control such as trajectory tracking and position reaching. To address these challenges, we propose a framework of Deep Koopman-based Model Predictive Control (DK-MPC) for handling multi-segment soft robots. We first employ a deep learning approach with sampling data to approximate the Koopman operator, which therefore linearizes the high-dimensional nonlinear dynamics of the soft robots into a finite-dimensional linear representation. Secondly, this linearized model is utilized within a model predictive control framework to compute optimal control inputs that minimize the tracking error between the desired and actual state trajectories. The real-world experiments on the soft robot “Chordata” demonstrate that DK-MPC could achieve highprecision control, showing the potential of DK-MPC for future applications to soft robots. More visualization results can be found at https://pinkmoon-io.github.io/DKMPC/.
Lei Lv, Lei Liu 0076, Fuchun Sun 0001, Jiahong Dong, Jianwei Zhang 0001, Xuemei Shan, Kai Sun 0014, Hao Huang 0009, Yu Luo 0021
ICRA7
2025 Analysis and Experiment of a Pneumatic Linear Actuator Actuated by both Positive and Negative Pressures
abstract
This paper establishes an analytical model for a dual-pressure-actuated pneumatic linear actuator, investigating the relationship between the output force of the linear actuator and both the pressure differential and displacement. Experiments were designed to validate the model. The maximum output force of the linear actuator under negative pressure (-40 kPa) is 100 N, while under hybrid air pressure (negative pressure -40kPa combined with positive pressure 40 kPa), the maximum output force significantly increases to approximately 210 N, demonstrating that dual pressure driving can substantially enhance output performance. The analytical results exhibit excellent agreement with experimental data under low-pressure conditions, with a maximum relative error of only 5%. Furthermore, comparisons with a flexible bellows of the same dimensions confirm that the linear actuator also exhibits high stiffness. Finally, potential applications of the linear actuator in daily life are discussed.
Weijian Ni, Yufei Hao, Xuemei Shan
IROS4