Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michal Jamroz 0002
dblp:126/7189-2
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 32% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network › convolutional neural network architecture
convolutional residual networks |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent space
latent space analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
representation complexity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic models of neural representations · 0.7class-conditional density estimation · 0.7maximum mean discrepancy · 0.4bayesian nonparametrics · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Certified robustness with class-conditional randomized smoothing
Michal Jamroz 0002, Marcin Kurdziel |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 1 |
| 2023 | Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional NetworksabstractWe leverage probabilistic models of neural representations to investigate how residual networks fit classes. To this end, we estimate class-conditional density models for representations learned by deep ResNets. We then use these models to characterize distributions of representations across learned classes. Surprisingly, we find that classes in the investigated models are not fitted in a uniform way. On the contrary: we uncover two groups of classes that are fitted with markedly different distributions of representations. These distinct modes of class-fitting are evident only in the deeper layers of the investigated models, indicating that they are not related to low-level image features. We show that the uncovered structure in neural representations correlate with memorization of training examples and adversarial robustness. Finally, we compare class-conditional distributions of neural representations between memorized and typical examples. This allows us to uncover where in the network structure class labels arise for memorized and standard inputs. Michal Jamroz 0002, Marcin Kurdziel |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep RepresentationsabstractWe investigate neural network representations from a probabilistic perspective. Specifically, we leverage Bayesian nonparametrics to construct models of neural activations in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and latent representations in Variational Autoencoders (VAEs). This allows us to formulate a tractable complexity measure for distributions of neural activations and to explore global structure of latent spaces learned by VAEs. We use this machinery to uncover how memorization and two common forms of regularization, i.e. dropout and input augmentation, influence representational complexity in CNNs. We demonstrate that networks that can exploit patterns in data learn vastly less complex representations than networks forced to memorize. We also show marked differences between effects of input augmentation and dropout, with the latter strongly depending on network width. Next, we investigate latent representations learned by standard $\beta$-VAEs and Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) $\beta$-VAEs. We show that aggregated posterior in standard VAEs quickly collapses to the diagonal prior when regularization strength increases. MMD-VAEs, on the other hand, learn more complex posterior distributions, even with strong regularization. While this gives a richer sample space, MMD-VAEs do not exhibit independence of latent dimensions. Finally, we leverage our probabilistic models as an effective sampling strategy for latent codes, improving quality of samples in VAEs with rich posteriors. Michal Jamroz 0002, Marcin Kurdziel, Mateusz Opala |
NeurIPS | 1 |