Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michal Jamroz 0002

dblp:126/7189-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 32% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 17%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network › convolutional neural network architecture
convolutional residual networks
0.712023
Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent space
latent space analysis
0.412020
A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.412020
A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis
0.412020
A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
representation complexity
0.412020
A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.412020
A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.212023
Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212023
Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.212023
Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic models of neural representations · 0.7class-conditional density estimation · 0.7maximum mean discrepancy · 0.4bayesian nonparametrics · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Certified robustness with class-conditional randomized smoothing
Michal Jamroz 0002, Marcin Kurdziel
Pattern Recognit. Lett.1
2023 Neural Representations Reveal Distinct Modes of Class Fitting in Residual Convolutional Networks
abstract
We leverage probabilistic models of neural representations to investigate how residual networks fit classes. To this end, we estimate class-conditional density models for representations learned by deep ResNets. We then use these models to characterize distributions of representations across learned classes. Surprisingly, we find that classes in the investigated models are not fitted in a uniform way. On the contrary: we uncover two groups of classes that are fitted with markedly different distributions of representations. These distinct modes of class-fitting are evident only in the deeper layers of the investigated models, indicating that they are not related to low-level image features. We show that the uncovered structure in neural representations correlate with memorization of training examples and adversarial robustness. Finally, we compare class-conditional distributions of neural representations between memorized and typical examples. This allows us to uncover where in the network structure class labels arise for memorized and standard inputs.
Michal Jamroz 0002, Marcin Kurdziel
AAAI1
2020 A Bayesian Nonparametrics View into Deep Representations
abstract
We investigate neural network representations from a probabilistic perspective. Specifically, we leverage Bayesian nonparametrics to construct models of neural activations in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and latent representations in Variational Autoencoders (VAEs). This allows us to formulate a tractable complexity measure for distributions of neural activations and to explore global structure of latent spaces learned by VAEs. We use this machinery to uncover how memorization and two common forms of regularization, i.e. dropout and input augmentation, influence representational complexity in CNNs. We demonstrate that networks that can exploit patterns in data learn vastly less complex representations than networks forced to memorize. We also show marked differences between effects of input augmentation and dropout, with the latter strongly depending on network width. Next, we investigate latent representations learned by standard $\beta$-VAEs and Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) $\beta$-VAEs. We show that aggregated posterior in standard VAEs quickly collapses to the diagonal prior when regularization strength increases. MMD-VAEs, on the other hand, learn more complex posterior distributions, even with strong regularization. While this gives a richer sample space, MMD-VAEs do not exhibit independence of latent dimensions. Finally, we leverage our probabilistic models as an effective sampling strategy for latent codes, improving quality of samples in VAEs with rich posteriors.
Michal Jamroz 0002, Marcin Kurdziel, Mateusz Opala
NeurIPS1