Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chuanqi Shen

dblp:126/9514 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0009-0008-4402-4887ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 72% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 28%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › computational biology
consensus trees
0.422016
Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · J. ACM 2016
Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · SODA 2013
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
tree algorithms
0.422016
Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · J. ACM 2016
Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · SODA 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic tree summarization
consensus tree
0.322013
Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · SODA 2013
An Optimal Algorithm for Building the Majority Rule Consensus Tree · RECOMB 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.322013
Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · SODA 2013
An Optimal Algorithm for Building the Majority Rule Consensus Tree · RECOMB 2013
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action detection
temporal action localization
0.312017
SST: Single-Stream Temporal Action Proposals · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action detection › temporal action localization
temporal action proposal generation
0.312017
SST: Single-Stream Temporal Action Proposals · CVPR 2017
Algorithms and data structures
computational biology
0.212016
Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · J. ACM 2016
Algorithms and data structures › computational biology
phylogenetic trees
0.212016
Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · J. ACM 2016
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.112017
SST: Single-Stream Temporal Action Proposals · CVPR 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deterministic algorithm · 0.3single-stream temporal model · 0.3deep architecture · 0.3combinatorial algorithms · 0.2combinatorial algorithm · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Algorithms for the Majority Rule (+) Consensus Tree and the Frequency Difference Consensus Tree
abstract
This article presents two new deterministic algorithms for constructing consensus trees. Given an input of phylogenetic trees with identical leaf label sets and leaves each, the first algorithm constructs the majority rule (+) consensus tree in time, which is optimal since the input size is , and the second one constructs the frequency difference consensus tree in time.
Jesper Jansson 0001, Ramesh Rajaby, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.3
2017 SST: Single-Stream Temporal Action Proposals
abstract
Our paper presents a new approach for temporal detection of human actions in long, untrimmed video sequences. We introduce Single-Stream Temporal Action Proposals (SST), a new effective and efficient deep architecture for the generation of temporal action proposals. Our network can run continuously in a single stream over very long input video sequences, without the need to divide input into short overlapping clips or temporal windows for batch processing. We demonstrate empirically that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art on the task of temporal action proposal generation, while achieving some of the fastest processing speeds in the literature. Finally, we demonstrate that using SST proposals in conjunction with existing action classifiers results in improved state-of-the-art temporal action detection performance.
Shyamal Buch, Victor Escorcia, Chuanqi Shen, Bernard Ghanem, Juan Carlos Niebles
CVPR3
2016 Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees
abstract
A consensus tree is a single phylogenetic tree that summarizes the branching structure in a given set of conflicting phylogenetic trees. Many different types of consensus trees have been proposed in the literature; three of the most well-known and widely used ones are the majority rule consensus tree , the loose consensus tree , and the greedy consensus tree . This article presents new deterministic algorithms for constructing them that are faster than all the previously known ones. Given k phylogenetic trees with n leaves each and with identical leaf label sets, our algorithms run in O ( nk ) time (majority rule consensus tree), O ( nk ) time (loose consensus tree), and O ( n 2 k ) time (greedy consensus tree). Our algorithms for the majority rule consensus and the loose consensus trees are optimal since the input size is Ω( nk ). Experimental results show that the algorithms are fast in practice.
Jesper Jansson 0001, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung
J. ACM2
2013 An Optimal Algorithm for Building the Majority Rule Consensus Tree
Jesper Jansson 0001, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung
RECOMB2
2013 Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees
abstract
A consensus tree is a single phylogenetic tree that summarizes the branching structure in a given set of conflicting phylogenetic trees. Many different types of consensus trees have been proposed in the literature; three of the most well-known and widely used ones are the majority rule consensus tree, the loose consensus tree, and the greedy consensus tree. This paper presents new deterministic algorithms for constructing them that are faster than all the previously known ones. Given k phylogenetic trees with n leaves each and with identical leaf label sets, our algorithms run in O(nk log k) time (majority rule consensus tree), O(nk) time (loose consensus tree), and O(n2k) time (greedy consensus tree).
Jesper Jansson 0001, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung
SODA2
2013 Algorithms for the Majority Rule (+) Consensus Tree and the Frequency Difference Consensus Tree
Jesper Jansson 0001, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung
WABI2