Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chuanqi Shen
dblp:126/9514
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0009-0008-4402-4887ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 72% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 28% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Video understanding and tracking · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures › computational biology
consensus trees |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · J. ACM 2016 Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · SODA 2013 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
tree algorithms |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · J. ACM 2016 Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · SODA 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic tree summarization
consensus tree |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · SODA 2013 An Optimal Algorithm for Building the Majority Rule Consensus Tree · RECOMB 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · SODA 2013 An Optimal Algorithm for Building the Majority Rule Consensus Tree · RECOMB 2013 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action detection
temporal action localization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | SST: Single-Stream Temporal Action Proposals · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action detection › temporal action localization
temporal action proposal generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | SST: Single-Stream Temporal Action Proposals · CVPR 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures
computational biology |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · J. ACM 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › computational biology
phylogenetic trees |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus Trees · J. ACM 2016 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | SST: Single-Stream Temporal Action Proposals · CVPR 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deterministic algorithm · 0.3single-stream temporal model · 0.3deep architecture · 0.3combinatorial algorithms · 0.2combinatorial algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Algorithms for the Majority Rule (+) Consensus Tree and the Frequency Difference Consensus TreeabstractThis article presents two new deterministic algorithms for constructing consensus trees. Given an input of phylogenetic trees with identical leaf label sets and leaves each, the first algorithm constructs the majority rule (+) consensus tree in time, which is optimal since the input size is , and the second one constructs the frequency difference consensus tree in time. Jesper Jansson 0001, Ramesh Rajaby, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung |
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2017 | SST: Single-Stream Temporal Action ProposalsabstractOur paper presents a new approach for temporal detection of human actions in long, untrimmed video sequences. We introduce Single-Stream Temporal Action Proposals (SST), a new effective and efficient deep architecture for the generation of temporal action proposals. Our network can run continuously in a single stream over very long input video sequences, without the need to divide input into short overlapping clips or temporal windows for batch processing. We demonstrate empirically that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art on the task of temporal action proposal generation, while achieving some of the fastest processing speeds in the literature. Finally, we demonstrate that using SST proposals in conjunction with existing action classifiers results in improved state-of-the-art temporal action detection performance. Shyamal Buch, Victor Escorcia, Chuanqi Shen, Bernard Ghanem, Juan Carlos Niebles |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2016 | Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus TreesabstractA consensus tree is a single phylogenetic tree that summarizes the branching structure in a given set of conflicting phylogenetic trees. Many different types of consensus trees have been proposed in the literature; three of the most well-known and widely used ones are the majority rule consensus tree , the loose consensus tree , and the greedy consensus tree . This article presents new deterministic algorithms for constructing them that are faster than all the previously known ones. Given k phylogenetic trees with n leaves each and with identical leaf label sets, our algorithms run in O ( nk ) time (majority rule consensus tree), O ( nk ) time (loose consensus tree), and O ( n 2 k ) time (greedy consensus tree). Our algorithms for the majority rule consensus and the loose consensus trees are optimal since the input size is Ω( nk ). Experimental results show that the algorithms are fast in practice. Jesper Jansson 0001, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung |
J. ACM | 2 |
| 2013 | An Optimal Algorithm for Building the Majority Rule Consensus Tree
Jesper Jansson 0001, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung |
RECOMB | 2 |
| 2013 | Improved Algorithms for Constructing Consensus TreesabstractA consensus tree is a single phylogenetic tree that summarizes the branching structure in a given set of conflicting phylogenetic trees. Many different types of consensus trees have been proposed in the literature; three of the most well-known and widely used ones are the majority rule consensus tree, the loose consensus tree, and the greedy consensus tree. This paper presents new deterministic algorithms for constructing them that are faster than all the previously known ones. Given k phylogenetic trees with n leaves each and with identical leaf label sets, our algorithms run in O(nk log k) time (majority rule consensus tree), O(nk) time (loose consensus tree), and O(n2k) time (greedy consensus tree). Jesper Jansson 0001, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung |
SODA | 2 |
| 2013 | Algorithms for the Majority Rule (+) Consensus Tree and the Frequency Difference Consensus Tree
Jesper Jansson 0001, Chuanqi Shen, Wing-Kin Sung |
WABI | 2 |