Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Milad Miladi
dblp:126/9517
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-0173-3009ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
simultaneous alignment and folding |
0.8 | 3 | 2020 | The locality dilemma of Sankoff-like RNA alignments · Bioinform. 2020 SPARSE: quadratic time simultaneous alignment and folding of RNAs without sequence-based heuristics · Bioinform. 2015 SPARSE: Quadratic Time Simultaneous Alignment and Folding of RNAs without Sequence-Based Heuristics · RECOMB 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis
RNA structure probing |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | Integration of accessibility data from structure probing into RNA-RNA interaction prediction · Bioinform. 2019 ShaKer: RNA SHAPE prediction using graph kernel · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis
RNA bioinformatics |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Integration of accessibility data from structure probing into RNA-RNA interaction prediction · Bioinform. 2019 RNAscClust: clustering RNA sequences using structure conservation and graph based motifs · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › RNA sequence analysis
RNA alignment |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The locality dilemma of Sankoff-like RNA alignments · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA interaction prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Integration of accessibility data from structure probing into RNA-RNA interaction prediction · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure
RNA secondary structure |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | RNAscClust: clustering RNA sequences using structure conservation and graph based motifs · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA structure |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | RNAscClust: clustering RNA sequences using structure conservation and graph based motifs · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | SPARSE: quadratic time simultaneous alignment and folding of RNAs without sequence-based heuristics · Bioinform. 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | SPARSE: Quadratic Time Simultaneous Alignment and Folding of RNAs without Sequence-Based Heuristics · RECOMB 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction › RNA interaction prediction
RNA-RNA interaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | ShaKer: RNA SHAPE prediction using graph kernel · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA structure prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | ShaKer: RNA SHAPE prediction using graph kernel · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph kernel · 0.7dynamic programming · 0.5sankoff algorithm · 0.4parameter learning · 0.4thermodynamics-based prediction · 0.4machine learning · 0.4accessibility-based interaction prediction · 0.4structural alignment · 0.3minimum free energy folding · 0.3lightweight energy model · 0.2simultaneous alignment and folding · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | The locality dilemma of Sankoff-like RNA alignmentsabstractMOTIVATION: Elucidating the functions of non-coding RNAs by homology has been strongly limited due to fundamental computational and modeling issues. While existing simultaneous alignment and folding (SA&F) algorithms successfully align homologous RNAs with precisely known boundaries (global SA&F), the more pressing problem of identifying new classes of homologous RNAs in the genome (local SA&F) is intrinsically more difficult and much less understood. Typically, the length of local alignments is strongly overestimated and alignment boundaries are dramatically mispredicted. We hypothesize that local SA&F approaches are compromised this way due to a score bias, which is caused by the contribution of RNA structure similarity to their overall alignment score. RESULTS: In the light of this hypothesis, we study pairwise local SA&F for the first time systematically-based on a novel local RNA alignment benchmark set and quality measure. First, we vary the relative influence of structure similarity compared to sequence similarity. Putting more emphasis on the structure component leads to overestimating the length of local alignments. This clearly shows the bias of current scores and strongly hints at the structure component as its origin. Second, we study the interplay of several important scoring parameters by learning parameters for local and global SA&F. The divergence of these optimized parameter sets underlines the fundamental obstacles for local SA&F. Third, by introducing a position-wise correction term in local SA&F, we constructively solve its principal issues. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The benchmark data, detailed results and scripts are available at https://github.com/BackofenLab/local_alignment. The RNA alignment tool LocARNA, including the modifications proposed in this work, is available at https://github.com/s-will/LocARNA/releases/tag/v2.0.0RC6. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Teresa Müller, Milad Miladi, Frank Hutter, Ivo L. Hofacker, Sebastian Will, Rolf Backofen |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2019 | Fast and Accurate Structure Probability Estimation for Simultaneous Alignment and Folding of RNAsabstractMotivation: Simultaneous alignment and folding (SA&F) of RNAs is the indispensable gold standard for inferring the structure of non-coding RNAs and their general analysis. The original algorithm, proposed by Sankoff, solves the theoretical problem exactly with a complexity of O(n^6) in the full energy model. Over the last two decades, several variants and improvements of the Sankoff algorithm have been proposed to reduce its extreme complexity by proposing simplified energy models or imposing restrictions on the predicted alignments. Results: Here we introduce a novel variant of Sankoff’s algorithm that reconciles the simplifications of PMcomp, namely moving from the full energy model to a simpler base pair-based model, with the accuracy of the loop-based full energy model. Instead of estimating pseudo-energies from unconditional base pair probabilities, our model calculates energies from conditional base pair probabilities that allow to accurately capture structure probabilities, which obey a conditional dependency. Supporting modifications with surgical precision, this model gives rise to the fast and highly accurate novel algorithm Pankov (Probabilistic Sankoff-like simultaneous alignment and folding of RNAs inspired by Markov chains). Pankov benefits from the speed-up of excluding unreliable base-pairing without compromising the loop-based free energy model of the Sankoff’s algorithm. We show that Pankov outperforms its predecessors LocARNA and SPARSE in folding quality and is faster than LocARNA. Pankov is developed as a branch of the LocARNA package and available at https://github.com/mmiladi/Pankov. Milad Miladi, Martin Raden, Sebastian Will, Rolf Backofen |
WABI | 1 |
| 2019 | ShaKer: RNA SHAPE prediction using graph kernelabstractSUMMARY: SHAPE experiments are used to probe the structure of RNA molecules. We present ShaKer to predict SHAPE data for RNA using a graph-kernel-based machine learning approach that is trained on experimental SHAPE information. While other available methods require a manually curated reference structure, ShaKer predicts reactivity data based on sequence input only and by sampling the ensemble of possible structures. Thus, ShaKer is well placed to enable experiment-driven, transcriptome-wide SHAPE data prediction to enable the study of RNA structuredness and to improve RNA structure and RNA-RNA interaction prediction. For performance evaluation, we use accuracy and accessibility comparing to experimental SHAPE data and competing methods. We can show that Shaker outperforms its competitors and is able to predict high quality SHAPE annotations even when no reference structure is provided. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ShaKer is freely available at https://github.com/BackofenLab/ShaKer. Stefan Mautner, Soheila Montaseri, Milad Miladi, Martin Raden, Fabrizio Costa, Rolf Backofen |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2019 | Integration of accessibility data from structure probing into RNA-RNA interaction predictionabstractSUMMARY: Experimental structure probing data has been shown to improve thermodynamics-based RNA secondary structure prediction. To this end, chemical reactivity information (as provided e.g. by SHAPE) is incorporated, which encodes whether or not individual nucleotides are involved in intra-molecular structure. Since inter-molecular RNA-RNA interactions are often confined to unpaired RNA regions, SHAPE data is even more promising to improve interaction prediction. Here, we show how such experimental data can be incorporated seamlessly into accessibility-based RNA-RNA interaction prediction approaches, as implemented in IntaRNA. This is possible via the computation and use of unpaired probabilities that incorporate the structure probing information. We show that experimental SHAPE data can significantly improve RNA-RNA interaction prediction. We evaluate our approach by investigating interactions of a spliceosomal U1 snRNA transcript with its target splice sites. When SHAPE data is incorporated, known target sites are predicted with increased precision and specificity. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/BackofenLab/IntaRNA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Milad Miladi, Soheila Montaseri, Rolf Backofen, Martin Raden |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2017 | RNAscClust: clustering RNA sequences using structure conservation and graph based motifsabstractMOTIVATION: Clustering RNA sequences with common secondary structure is an essential step towards studying RNA function. Whereas structural RNA alignment strategies typically identify common structure for orthologous structured RNAs, clustering seeks to group paralogous RNAs based on structural similarities. However, existing approaches for clustering paralogous RNAs, do not take the compensatory base pair changes obtained from structure conservation in orthologous sequences into account. RESULTS: Here, we present RNAscClust , the implementation of a new algorithm to cluster a set of structured RNAs taking their respective structural conservation into account. For a set of multiple structural alignments of RNA sequences, each containing a paralog sequence included in a structural alignment of its orthologs, RNAscClust computes minimum free-energy structures for each sequence using conserved base pairs as prior information for the folding. The paralogs are then clustered using a graph kernel-based strategy, which identifies common structural features. We show that the clustering accuracy clearly benefits from an increasing degree of compensatory base pair changes in the alignments. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: RNAscClust is available at http://www.bioinf.uni-freiburg.de/Software/RNAscClust . CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Milad Miladi, Alexander Junge, Fabrizio Costa, Stefan E. Seemann, Jakob Hull Havgaard, Jan Gorodkin, Rolf Backofen |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2015 | SPARSE: quadratic time simultaneous alignment and folding of RNAs without sequence-based heuristicsabstractMOTIVATION: RNA-Seq experiments have revealed a multitude of novel ncRNAs. The gold standard for their analysis based on simultaneous alignment and folding suffers from extreme time complexity of [Formula: see text]. Subsequently, numerous faster 'Sankoff-style' approaches have been suggested. Commonly, the performance of such methods relies on sequence-based heuristics that restrict the search space to optimal or near-optimal sequence alignments; however, the accuracy of sequence-based methods breaks down for RNAs with sequence identities below 60%. Alignment approaches like LocARNA that do not require sequence-based heuristics, have been limited to high complexity ([Formula: see text] quartic time). RESULTS: Breaking this barrier, we introduce the novel Sankoff-style algorithm 'sparsified prediction and alignment of RNAs based on their structure ensembles (SPARSE)', which runs in quadratic time without sequence-based heuristics. To achieve this low complexity, on par with sequence alignment algorithms, SPARSE features strong sparsification based on structural properties of the RNA ensembles. Following PMcomp, SPARSE gains further speed-up from lightweight energy computation. Although all existing lightweight Sankoff-style methods restrict Sankoff's original model by disallowing loop deletions and insertions, SPARSE transfers the Sankoff algorithm to the lightweight energy model completely for the first time. Compared with LocARNA, SPARSE achieves similar alignment and better folding quality in significantly less time (speedup: 3.7). At similar run-time, it aligns low sequence identity instances substantially more accurate than RAF, which uses sequence-based heuristics. Sebastian Will, Christina Otto, Milad Miladi, Mathias Möhl, Rolf Backofen |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2013 | SPARSE: Quadratic Time Simultaneous Alignment and Folding of RNAs without Sequence-Based Heuristics
Sebastian Will, Christina Schmiedl, Milad Miladi, Mathias Möhl, Rolf Backofen |
RECOMB | 3 |