Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vaidyanathan Srinivasan

dblp:127/1310 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-6860-2823ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Energy-efficient computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Energy-efficient computing › power management › dynamic voltage and frequency scaling
dynamic frequency scaling
0.712023
TokenSmart: Distributed, Scalable Power Management in the Many-core Era · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2023
Energy-efficient computing › power management
power capping
0.712023
TokenSmart: Distributed, Scalable Power Management in the Many-core Era · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2023
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.712023
TokenSmart: Distributed, Scalable Power Management in the Many-core Era · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2023
Operating systems › resource management
power management
0.212023
TokenSmart: Distributed, Scalable Power Management in the Many-core Era · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2023
Operating systems
resource management
0.212023
TokenSmart: Distributed, Scalable Power Management in the Many-core Era · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

token-based distributed control · 1.3heuristic design · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 TokenSmart: Distributed, Scalable Power Management in the Many-core Era
abstract
Centralized power management control systems are hitting a scalability limit. In particular, enforcing a power cap in a many-core system in a performance-friendly manner is quite challenging. Today’s on-chip controller reduces the clock speed of compute domains in response to local or global power limit alerts. However, this is opaque to the operating system (OS), which continues to request higher clock frequency based on the workload characteristics acting against the centralized on-chip controller. To address these issues, we introduce TokenSmart, which implements a set of scalable distributed frequency control heuristics within the OS, using a novel token-based mechanism. The number of system-allocated power tokens represents the maximum allowable power consumption; and the OS governor orchestrates a token-passing (or sharing) algorithm between the compute engines. Token allocation count increase (decrease) corresponds to a increase (decrease) of clock frequency. The compute units are connected in a ring-topology allowing minimal meta-data to be passed along with the token value for regulating power budget. We explore different heuristics to assign tokens smartly across the units. This results in efficient power regulation and sustenance of turbo frequencies over a longer duration. Our proposed methodology can be implemented in hardware with multiple on-chip controllers, or in software where each set of cores acts as a compute unit. The methodology is currently implemented within the Linux kernel of a real IBM POWER9 many-core system and experimentally verified on different real world workloads such as Redis, Cassandra, PostgreSQL along with a micro-benchmark such as rt-app. Our experiments indicate the increase in throughput for all the workloads along with the benefit of power savings. For instance, results show a considerable boost of about 4% in throughput of both the PostgreSQL and Redis benchmark with a substantial savings in power consumption (18% and 37%, respectively). If the approach is implemented in hardware, then our experimental analysis speculates the throughput to increase up to 14% in PostgreSQL benchmark.
Ranjal Gautham Shenoy, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan, Pradip Bose, Alper Buyuktosunoglu
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim.3