Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ankush Jain

dblp:127/1323 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
8as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6042-7853ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Storage systems · 80% High-performance computing · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 50% Indexing and storage engines · 50%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Indexing and storage engines
range index
0.812024
CARP: Range Query-Optimized Indexing for Streaming Data · SC 2024
Query processing and optimization
range query
0.812024
CARP: Range Query-Optimized Indexing for Streaming Data · SC 2024
Storage systems
indexing
0.812024
CARP: Range Query-Optimized Indexing for Streaming Data · SC 2024
Storage systems
computational storage
0.412020
Streaming Data Reorganization at Scale with DeltaFS Indexed Massive Directories · ACM Trans. Storage 2020
Storage systems
file systems
0.412020
Streaming Data Reorganization at Scale with DeltaFS Indexed Massive Directories · ACM Trans. Storage 2020
High-performance computing › scientific data analysis
in-situ analysis
0.412020
Streaming Data Reorganization at Scale with DeltaFS Indexed Massive Directories · ACM Trans. Storage 2020
Storage systems › data placement
data reorganization
0.112020
Streaming Data Reorganization at Scale with DeltaFS Indexed Massive Directories · ACM Trans. Storage 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data reordering · 1.5data partitioning · 1.5dynamic reorganization · 0.4compute resource harvesting · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Lessons from Profiling and Optimizing Placement in AMR Codes
abstract
Block-structured Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR), while essential for improving efficiency in large-scale irregular and dynamic simulations, poses unique optimization challenges. Previous work has identified load imbalance and synchronization overhead as key obstacles to performance, but the deep understanding of complex runtime behavior needed to systematically address them remains elusive. In this paper, we integrate telemetry collection, analysis, and intervention to bridge this understanding gap. Establishing reliable, actionable telemetry required systematic tuning to eliminate cross-stack performance anomalies. Leveraging this foundation we design CPLX, a tunable placement policy balancing compute load and communication locality, improving runtime by up to$\mathbf{2 1. 6 \%}$over optimized baselines. Our experience highlights the empirical nature of placement optimization, requiring theoretical models to be grounded in observed runtime behavior.
Ankush Jain, Chuck Cranor, Qing Zheng, Dominic Manno, George Amvrosiadis, Gary Grider
CLUSTER1
2024 CARP: Range Query-Optimized Indexing for Streaming Data
abstract
Ingestion of data generated by high-performance scientific applications continues to stress available storage resources. Efficient range-based analyses on this data can be enabled by reordering it on attributes of interest, but require expensive post-processing sorts to realize the query benefits of reordering. In-situ indexing techniques, while write-efficient, are orders of magnitude slower at range queries than sorted indices. Range queries are necessary for analyzing continuous physical attributes and tracking phenomena such as energy bands and wave fronts. We present CARP, a scalable data partitioner for range queries that reorders data in-situ as it is streamed to storage during application I/O. Motivated by our findings that real application distributions tend to be highly skewed and dynamic, CARP dynamically discovers and adapts its data partitions to track these characteristics. As a result, CARP can approximate the query performance of a sort without any ingestion overhead, making it $5 \times$ faster than prior work.
Ankush Jain, Chuck Cranor, Qing Zheng, Bradley W. Settlemyer, George Amvrosiadis, Gary Grider
SC1
2024 KNetwork: advancing cross-lingual sentiment analysis for enhanced decision-making in linguistically diverse environments
Ankush Jain, Garima Jain, Dhruv Tewari
Knowl. Inf. Syst.1
2023 Structural similarity-based Bi-representation through true noise level for noise-robust face super-resolution
Surendra Nagar, Ankush Jain, Pramod Kumar Singh, Ajay Kumar 0002
Multim. Tools Appl.2
2023 A hybrid learning-based genetic and grey-wolf optimizer for global optimization
Ankush Jain, Surendra Nagar, Pramod Kumar Singh, Joydip Dhar
Soft Comput.1
2022 ADC@Θr: Adaptive divisional categorization of ratings under rating threshold Θr for similarity computation in recommendation systems
Ankush Jain, Surendra Nagar, Pramod Kumar Singh, Joydip Dhar
Appl. Intell.1
2022 Adaptive optimal multi-features learning based representation for face hallucination
Surendra Nagar, Ankush Jain, Pramod Kumar Singh, Ajay Kumar 0002
Expert Syst. Appl.2
2021 Mixed-noise robust face super-resolution through residual-learning based error suppressed nearest neighbor representation
Surendra Nagar, Ankush Jain, Pramod Kumar Singh, Ajay Kumar 0002
Inf. Sci.2
2021 Energy and congestion aware routing based on hybrid gradient fields for wireless sensor networks
Ankush Jain, Kiran Kumar Pattanaik, Ajay Kumar 0002, Paolo Bellavista
Wirel. Networks1
2020 EMUCF: Enhanced multistage user-based collaborative filtering through non-linear similarity for recommendation systems
Ankush Jain, Surendra Nagar, Pramod Kumar Singh, Joydip Dhar
Expert Syst. Appl.1
2020 Multi-objective item evaluation for diverse as well as novel item recommendations
Ankush Jain, Pramod Kumar Singh, Joydip Dhar
Expert Syst. Appl.1
2020 Streaming Data Reorganization at Scale with DeltaFS Indexed Massive Directories
abstract
Complex storage stacks providing data compression, indexing, and analytics help leverage the massive amounts of data generated today to derive insights. It is challenging to perform this computation, however, while fully utilizing the underlying storage media. This is because, while storage servers with large core counts are widely available, single-core performance and memory bandwidth per core grow slower than the core count per die. Computational storage offers a promising solution to this problem by utilizing dedicated compute resources along the storage processing path. We present DeltaFS Indexed Massive Directories (IMDs), a new approach to computational storage. DeltaFS IMDs harvest available (i.e., not dedicated) compute, memory, and network resources on the compute nodes of an application to perform computation on data. We demonstrate the efficiency of DeltaFS IMDs by using them to dynamically reorganize the output of a real-world simulation application across 131,072 CPU cores. DeltaFS IMDs speed up reads by 1,740× while only slightly slowing down the writing of data during simulation I/O for in situ data processing.
Qing Zheng, Chuck Cranor, Ankush Jain, Gregory R. Ganger, Garth A. Gibson, George Amvrosiadis, Bradley W. Settlemyer, Gary Grider
ACM Trans. Storage3
2019 Compact Filters for Fast Online Data Partitioning
abstract
We are approaching a point in time when it will be infeasible to catalog and query data after it has been generated. This trend has fueled research on in-situ data processing (i.e. operating on data as it is streamed to storage). One important example of this approach is in-situ data indexing. Prior work has shown the feasibility of indexing at scale as a two-step process. First, one partitions data by key across the CPU cores of a parallel job. Then each core indexes its subset as data is persisted. Online partitioning requires transferring data over the network so that it can be indexed and stored by the core responsible for the data. This approach is becoming increasingly costly as new computing platforms emphasize parallelism instead of individual core performance that is crucial for communication libraries and systems software in general. In addition to indexing, scalable online data partitioning is also useful in other contexts such as load balancing and efficient compression. We present FilterKV, an efficient data management scheme for fast online data partitioning of key-value (KV) pairs. FilterKV reduces the total amount of data sent over the network and to storage. We achieve this by: (a) partitioning pointers to KV pairs instead of the KV pairs themselves and (b) using a compact format to represent and store KV pointers. Results from LANL show that FilterKV can reduce total write slowdown (including partitioning overhead) by up to 3x across 4096 CPU cores.
Qing Zheng, Chuck Cranor, Ankush Jain, Gregory R. Ganger, Garth A. Gibson, George Amvrosiadis, Bradley W. Settlemyer, Gary Grider
CLUSTER3