Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anton Kuijsten

dblp:127/2968 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Security and privacy · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Operating systems · 56% Software maintenance and evolution · 44%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
dynamic software updating
0.212013
Safe and automatic live update for operating systems · ASPLOS 2013
Operating systems
live update
0.212013
Safe and automatic live update for operating systems · ASPLOS 2013
Systems and software security › memory safety
address space layout randomization
0.112012
Enhanced Operating System Security Through Efficient and Fine-grained Address Space Randomization · USENIX Security Symposium 2012
Systems and software security
memory safety
0.112012
Enhanced Operating System Security Through Efficient and Fine-grained Address Space Randomization · USENIX Security Symposium 2012
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
high-availability systems
0.012013
Safe and automatic live update for operating systems · ASPLOS 2013
Operating systems › system security
operating system security
0.012012
Enhanced Operating System Security Through Efficient and Fine-grained Address Space Randomization · USENIX Security Symposium 2012
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Safe and automatic live update for operating systems
abstract
Increasingly many systems have to run all the time with no downtime allowed. Consider, for example, systems controlling electric power plants and e-banking servers. Nevertheless, security patches and a constant stream of new operating system versions need to be deployed without stopping running programs. These factors naturally lead to a pressing demand for live update---upgrading all or parts of the operating system without rebooting. Unfortunately, existing solutions require significant manual intervention and thus work reliably only for small operating system patches.
Cristiano Giuffrida, Anton Kuijsten, Andrew S. Tanenbaum
ASPLOS2
2013 Back to the Future: Fault-tolerant Live Update with Time-traveling State Transfer
Cristiano Giuffrida, Calin Iorgulescu, Anton Kuijsten, Andrew S. Tanenbaum
LISA3
2013 EDFI: A Dependable Fault Injection Tool for Dependability Benchmarking Experiments
abstract
Fault injection is a pivotal technique in dependability benchmarking. Unfortunately, existing general-purpose fault injection tools either inject faults in predetermined memory locations or resort to random injection, approaches that generally result in poor fault coverage and controllability guarantees. This makes it difficult to reproduce or compare experiments across different systems or workloads. This paper presents EDFI, a new tool for dependable general-purpose fault injection experiments. EDFI combines static and dynamic program instrumentation to perform execution-driven fault injection, a technique which allows realistic software faults to be injected in a controlled way as the target system executes. Our instrumentation strategy guarantees a predetermined fault load distribution during the entirety of the experiment, independently of the particular system or workload considered. Our evaluation confirms that EDFI significantly improves the precision and controllability of prior tools, at the cost of only modest memory and performance overhead during fault-free execution.
Cristiano Giuffrida, Anton Kuijsten, Andrew S. Tanenbaum
PRDC2
2012 Enhanced Operating System Security Through Efficient and Fine-grained Address Space Randomization
Cristiano Giuffrida, Anton Kuijsten, Andrew S. Tanenbaum
USENIX Security Symposium2