Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sina Parastegari

dblp:128/0465 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-9181-690XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot manipulation · 88% Motion planning and robot control · 12%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.832018
Failure Recovery in Robot-Human Object Handover · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
A fail-safe object handover controller · ICRA 2016
Object Manipulation Using Unlimited Rolling Contacts: 2-D Kinematic Modeling and Motion Planning · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
regrasping
0.622018
Failure Recovery in Robot-Human Object Handover · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
A fail-safe object handover controller · ICRA 2016
Human-robot interaction › human-robot collaboration
error recovery
0.312018
Failure Recovery in Robot-Human Object Handover · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Human-robot interaction › physical human-robot interaction
object handover
0.312018
Failure Recovery in Robot-Human Object Handover · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Human-robot interaction
physical human-robot interaction
0.312018
Failure Recovery in Robot-Human Object Handover · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › physical human-robot interaction › object handover
human-to-robot handover
0.212016
A fail-safe object handover controller · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot manipulation › physical human-robot interaction
object handover
0.212016
A fail-safe object handover controller · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
grasp stability
0.212015
Object Manipulation Using Unlimited Rolling Contacts: 2-D Kinematic Modeling and Motion Planning · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.212015
Object Manipulation Using Unlimited Rolling Contacts: 2-D Kinematic Modeling and Motion Planning · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › sampling-based motion planning
probabilistic roadmap
0.112015
Object Manipulation Using Unlimited Rolling Contacts: 2-D Kinematic Modeling and Motion Planning · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

motion sensing · 0.7force sensing · 0.7acceleration sensing · 0.2static force closure map · 0.2kinematic modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Failure Recovery in Robot-Human Object Handover
abstract
Object handover is a common physical interaction between humans. It is thus also of significant interest for human-robot interaction. In this paper, we are focused on robot-to-human object handover. The main challenge in this case is how to reduce the failure rate, i.e., to ensure that the object does not fall (object safety), while at the same time allowing the human to easily acquire the object (smoothness). To endow the robot with a failure recovery mechanism, we investigated how humans detect failure during the transfer phase of the handover. We conducted a human study that showed that a human giver primarily relies on vision rather than haptic sensing to detect the fall of the object. Motivated by this study, a robotic handover system is proposed that consists of a motion sensor attached to the robot's gripper, a force sensor at the base of the gripper, and a controller that is capable of regrasping the object if it starts falling. The proposed system is implemented on a Baxter robot and is shown to achieve a smooth and safe handover.
Sina Parastegari, Ehsan Noohi, Bahareh Abbasi, Milos Zefran
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2017 Modeling human reaching phase in human-human object handover with application in robot-human handover
abstract
In robot to human object handover, the configuration (position and orientation) in which the object is transferred should be selected so that the handover is safe and comfortable for the human. The trajectory on which the robot moves the object to the point of transfer should be also selected so that the robot intention is clear and the handover feels natural to the human. In this paper, we propose to select the configuration for the transfer and the trajectory to reach this configuration based on what humans do in human-human handovers. We describe a human study designed to investigate the human-human handover and propose an ergonomic model that can predict object transfer position observed in the study. A human-robot experiment is then conducted that shows that the proposed model generates transfer positions that match the preferred height and distance relative to the human.
Sina Parastegari, Bahareh Abbasi, Ehsan Noohi, Milos Zefran
IROS1
2016 A fail-safe object handover controller
abstract
Humans rely on a multitude of senses to achieve a safe handover. The challenge for a robot-human handover is to both equip the robot with the appropriate sensors as well as devise handover controllers that effectively use them to prevent failures. In this paper we use object acceleration as an indicator of an impending handover failure and propose a handover controller that has re-grasping mechanism to prevent falling of the object in case of an imperfect handover. The work is motivated by our observation that humans primarily rely on vision to prevent handover failure. We also propose a novel acceleration sensing setup that can be integrated into a robot gripper. The handover controller is implemented on Baxter Research robot equipped with the proposed sensor and is shown to be effective in preventing object fall.
Sina Parastegari, Ehsan Noohi, Bahareh Abbasi, Milos Zefran
ICRA1
2016 Grasp taxonomy based on force distribution
abstract
Human grasp has been studied extensively and many taxonomies have been developed to classify different grasp types. In this work, we collect a comprehensive list of grasp types and investigate the force distribution patterns among them. We conduct a human study and collect force data in various grasp types. Data collection is performed by utilizing a data glove that has seventeen force sensors. We analyze the measured forces and identify different patterns in force distribution. Employing voting technique over various clustering methods, we propose a robust clustering for the force patterns, namely the grasp taxonomy in force domain. The proposed grasp taxonomy can be exploited in designing robotic prosthetic hands, designing grasp controllers and action recognition in human-robot interaction.
Bahareh Abbasi, Ehsan Noohi, Sina Parastegari, Milos Zefran
RO-MAN3
2015 Computational model for dyadic and bimanual reaching movements
abstract
While hand trajectory has been successfully modeled for single arm reaching movement, few works have considered the bimanual reaching movement and no study has modeled the dyadic reaching movement. In a bimanual task, both hands belong to the same person, while in a dyadic task each hand belongs to a different person. In this paper, we study both bimanual and dyadic reaching movements and show that the motion trajectory follows the minimum-jerk trajectory. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that studies the dyadic reaching movements. Furthermore, we show that our model is consistent with the existing theories on single arm motions, when applied to each of the cooperating arms.
Ehsan Noohi, Sina Parastegari, Milos Zefran
World Haptics2
2015 Object Manipulation Using Unlimited Rolling Contacts: 2-D Kinematic Modeling and Motion Planning
abstract
In a wheeled-tip manipulation system, the wheels at the tip of robot fingers grasp objects and manipulate them by rolling over their boundaries. In this paper, we introduce a 2-D kinematic modeling for wheeled-tip manipulation systems in order to handle rolling over objects' corners in the manipulation. The modeling facilitates motion planning through projecting grasp stability conditions into configuration space, which unifies the planning of the grasp stability and obstacle avoidance. It is done through defining a static force closure map independent of the obstacles and the robot mechanism. This results in a straightforward planning in PRM framework. The simulation and experimental results support the approach.
Ehsan Noohi, Hadi Moradi, Sina Parastegari, Majid Nili Ahmadabadi
IEEE Trans. Robotics3
2014 Using monocular images to estimate interaction forces during minimally invasive surgery
abstract
The lack of haptic feedback during minimally invasive surgery can cause significant tissue damage and increase morbidity. Estimating the applied force from endoscopic images is a promising approach, especially using binocular images. However, many existing operation rooms are only equipped with monocular endoscopes, making force estimation more problematic. In this paper a new method for estimating the applied force from monocular endoscope images is proposed. The main contribution is the concept of virtual template that enables modeling of surface deformation without the knowledge of the undeformed shape. Results of the in vitro experiment with the lamb liver support the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed method.
Ehsan Noohi, Sina Parastegari, Milos Zefran
IROS2