Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard Lei Li

dblp:128/0949 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 95% Program synthesis and code generation · 5%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.222013
Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013
MaramaEML: An Integrated Multi-View Business Process Modelling Environment with Tree-Overlays, Zoomable Interfaces and Code Generation · ASE 2008
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering › domain-specific modeling
domain-specific visual languages
0.212013
Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
metamodeling
0.012013
Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013
Requirements engineering and software design
visual notation design
0.012013
Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cognitive evaluation · 0.2multi-view visual modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Generating Domain-Specific Visual Language Tools from Abstract Visual Specifications
abstract
Domain-specific visual languages support high-level modeling for a wide range of application domains. However, building tools to support such languages is very challenging. We describe a set of key conceptual requirements for such tools and our approach to addressing these requirements, a set of visual language-based metatools. These support definition of metamodels, visual notations, views, modeling behaviors, design critics, and model transformations and provide a platform to realize target visual modeling tools. Extensions support collaborative work, human-centric tool interaction, and multiplatform deployment. We illustrate application of the metatoolset on tools developed with our approach. We describe tool developer and cognitive evaluations of our platform and our exemplar tools, and summarize key future research directions.
John C. Grundy, John G. Hosking, Karen Na-Liu Li, Norhayati Mohd. Ali, Jun Huh, Richard Lei Li
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.6
2008 MaramaEML: An Integrated Multi-View Business Process Modelling Environment with Tree-Overlays, Zoomable Interfaces and Code Generation
abstract
MaramaEML is an integrated support tool for the enterprise modelling language (EML) built using the Eclipse based Marama framework. It provides support for multiple visual notations including: the business process modelling notation (BPMN); the EML tree- based, multi-layer hierarchical service representation; fisheye zooming capabilities; automatic BPEL code generation; and inter-notation mapping.
Richard Lei Li, John G. Hosking, John C. Grundy
ASE1
2007 Visual Modelling of Complex Business Processes with Trees, Overlays and Distortion-based Displays
abstract
Current approaches to modelling complex business processes fail to scale to large organizations. Key issues are cobweb and labyrinth problems exhibited by conventional box and line metaphors and large numbers of hidden dependencies introduced by compartment-based modularity. We have been developing a new approach, Enterprise Modelling Language, based on trees, overlays and fish-eye viewers to overcome these shortcomings of existing workflow notations. EML utilizes several visual metaphors to enhance the representation, navigation and management of large organizational hierarchies and process flows. We describe a prototype support tool, MaramaEML, that provides support for multiple visual notations including the business process modelling notation (BPMN), the EML tree-based, multi-layer hierarchical representation, fisheye zooming capabilities, automatic BPEL code generation, and inter-notation mapping. We describe our experiences using EML to model large business processes and initial evaluation results.
Richard Lei Li, John G. Hosking, John C. Grundy
VL/HCC1