Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
George I. Kamberov
dblp:128/2023
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4560-4900ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 97% 3D vision · 3% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial examples |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Doppelgangers and Adversarial Vulnerability · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Doppelgangers and Adversarial Vulnerability · CVPR 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing › discrete geometry › discrete differential geometry › differential geometry
differential geometry of surfaces |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Geometric Integrability and Consistency of 3D Point Clouds · ICCV 2007 |
Geometric modeling and processing › point cloud processing
normal estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Geometric Integrability and Consistency of 3D Point Clouds · ICCV 2007 |
Geometric modeling and processing
point cloud processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Geometric Integrability and Consistency of 3D Point Clouds · ICCV 2007 |
Geometric modeling and processing
surface reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Recovering Surfaces from the Restoring Force · ECCV (2) 2002 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis
3d shape understanding |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Ill-Posed Problems in Surface and Surface Shape Recovery · CVPR 2000 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape reconstruction
surface recovery |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Ill-Posed Problems in Surface and Surface Shape Recovery · CVPR 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
perceptual metric · 0.9classification theory · 0.9integrability constraint · 0.1gauss map · 0.0differential geometry · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Doppelgangers and Adversarial VulnerabilityabstractMachine learning (ML) classifiers can make mistakes that are perceptually and cognitively disturbing to humans. The most notorious examples of such errors are adversarial visual metamers. This paper investigates the phenomenon of adversarial Doppelgängers (AD), which encompasses adversarial visual metamers, and compares the performance and robustness of ML classifiers to human performance.We find that ADs are inputs that are close to each other with respect to a perceptual metric defined in this paper, and show that ADs are qualitatively different from the usual adversarial examples. The vast majority of classifiers are vulnerable to ADs and robustness-accuracy trade-offs may not improve them. Some classification problems do not admit any AD-robust classifiers because the underlying classes are ambiguous. We provide criteria to determine whether a classification problem is well defined; describe the structure and attributes of AD-robust classifiers; introduce and explore the notions of conceptual entropy and regions of conceptual ambiguity for classifiers that are vulnerable to AD attacks; and discuss methods to bound the AD fooling rate of an attack. We define the notion of classifiers that exhibit hypersensitive behavior, that is, classifiers whose only mistakes are adversarial Doppelgängers. Improving the AD robustness of hypersensitive classifiers is equivalent to improving accuracy. We identify conditions guaranteeing that all classifiers with sufficiently high accuracy are hypersensitive. George I. Kamberov |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2014 | Unsupervised Detection of Video Sub-scenesabstractThe analysis of videos taken by active operators recording human interactions and activities in the field presents a new set of challenges. For brevity in this paper we will call such subject centric field grade videos ad hoc videos of events. Human test subjects readily segment ad hoc videos of events into scene-like segments. These segmentations can not be replicated by the state of the art automatic video segmentation algorithms. We propose and evaluate a method to segment ad hoc videos of events into atomic semantics units. Motivated by [Bel74] we call these units sub-scenes. Our experiments show that the segments detected by human subjects are sequences of sub-scenes. Thus the sub-scenes appear to be a semantic version of the video shots that are used to piece together scenes by state of the art video segmentation algorithms. George I. Kamberov, Matt Burlick, Lazaros Karydas, Olga Koteoglou |
ICPR | 1 |
| 2007 | Geometric Integrability and Consistency of 3D Point CloudsabstractNumerous applications processing 3D point data will gain from the ability to estimate reliably normals and differential geometric properties. Normal estimates are notoriously noisy, the errors propagate and may lead to flawed, inaccurate, and inconsistent curvature estimates. Frankot-Chellappa introduced the use of integrability constraints in normal estimation. Their approach deals with graphs z = f(x,y)- We present a newly discovered general orientability constraint (GOC) for 3D point clouds sampled from general surfaces, not just graphs. It provides a tool to quantify the confidence in the estimation of normals, topology, and geometry from a point cloud. Furthermore, similarly to the Frankot-Chellappa constraint, the GOC can be used directly to extract the topology and the geometry of the manifolds underlying 3D point clouds. As an illustration we describe an automatic Cloud-to-Geometry pipeline which exploits the GOC. George I. Kamberov, Gerda Kamberova |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2002 | Recovering Surfaces from the Restoring Force
George I. Kamberov, Gerda Kamberova |
ECCV (2) | 1 |
| 2000 | Ill-Posed Problems in Surface and Surface Shape RecoveryabstractWe present new theoretical results which have implications in answering one of the fundamental questions in computer vision: recognition of surfaces and surface shapes. We state the conditions under which: (i) a surface can be recovered, uniquely, from the tangent plane map, in particular from the Gauss map; (ii) a surface shape can be recovered from the metric and the deforming forces. In case where such conditions are not satisfied we classify all exceptions, i.e. the surfaces and surface shapes for which the recovery and registration problems are ill-posed. George I. Kamberov, Gerda Kamberova |
CVPR | 1 |