Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jens Hiller
dblp:128/2860
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-9067-8410ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 5 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 5 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
7 papers |
Network security · 69% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 25% Authentication and access control · 5% | |
| Computer networks
4 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 49% Routing and switching · 34% Internet architecture and protocols · 16% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security
anonymity networks |
1.6 | 4 | 2020 | TrafficSliver: Fighting Website Fingerprinting Attacks with Traffic Splitting · CCS 2020 Multipathing Traffic to Reduce Entry Node Exposure in Onion Routing · ICNP 2019 Tailoring Onion Routing to the Internet of Things: Security and Privacy in Untrusted Environments · ICNP 2019 |
Network security › anonymity networks
tor |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | TrafficSliver: Fighting Website Fingerprinting Attacks with Traffic Splitting · CCS 2020 POSTER: Traffic Splitting to Counter Website Fingerprinting · CCS 2019 |
Network security
traffic analysis |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | TrafficSliver: Fighting Website Fingerprinting Attacks with Traffic Splitting · CCS 2020 POSTER: Traffic Splitting to Counter Website Fingerprinting · CCS 2019 |
Network security › traffic analysis
website fingerprinting |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | TrafficSliver: Fighting Website Fingerprinting Attacks with Traffic Splitting · CCS 2020 POSTER: Traffic Splitting to Counter Website Fingerprinting · CCS 2019 |
Network security › traffic analysis
website fingerprinting defense |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | TrafficSliver: Fighting Website Fingerprinting Attacks with Traffic Splitting · CCS 2020 POSTER: Traffic Splitting to Counter Website Fingerprinting · CCS 2019 |
Network security › anonymity networks
onion routing |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | Multipathing Traffic to Reduce Entry Node Exposure in Onion Routing · ICNP 2019 Tailoring Onion Routing to the Internet of Things: Security and Privacy in Untrusted Environments · ICNP 2019 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
iot security |
0.5 | 2 | 2019 | Tailoring Onion Routing to the Internet of Things: Security and Privacy in Untrusted Environments · ICNP 2019 Tailoring end-to-end IP security protocols to the Internet of Things · ICNP 2013 |
Authentication and access control
certificate authority |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Boon and Bane of Cross-Signing: Shedding Light on a Common Practice in Public Key Infrastructures · CCS 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management › public key infrastructure
certificate revocation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Boon and Bane of Cross-Signing: Shedding Light on a Common Practice in Public Key Infrastructures · CCS 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
public key infrastructure |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Boon and Bane of Cross-Signing: Shedding Light on a Common Practice in Public Key Infrastructures · CCS 2020 |
Routing and switching
multipath routing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multipathing Traffic to Reduce Entry Node Exposure in Onion Routing · ICNP 2019 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
oblivious transfer |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Privacy-Preserving Remote Knowledge System · ICNP 2019 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
private set intersection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Privacy-Preserving Remote Knowledge System · ICNP 2019 |
Network security › attack strategy
denial-of-service attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Tailoring end-to-end IP security protocols to the Internet of Things · ICNP 2013 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key exchange |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Tailoring end-to-end IP security protocols to the Internet of Things · ICNP 2013 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › internet security protocols › TLS handshake
session resumption |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Tailoring end-to-end IP security protocols to the Internet of Things · ICNP 2013 |
Internet architecture and protocols › network security
TLS |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Boon and Bane of Cross-Signing: Shedding Light on a Common Practice in Public Key Infrastructures · CCS 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
end-to-end security |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Tailoring Onion Routing to the Internet of Things: Security and Privacy in Untrusted Environments · ICNP 2019 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Privacy-Preserving Remote Knowledge System · ICNP 2019 |
Internet architecture and protocols › network security
IP security |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Tailoring end-to-end IP security protocols to the Internet of Things · ICNP 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
traffic splitting · 1.2trust path analysis · 0.9passive TLS monitoring · 0.9certificate transparency log analysis · 0.9tor · 0.8cryptographic offloading · 0.8weighted random traffic splitting · 0.4private set intersection · 0.4oblivious transfer · 0.4protocol extension · 0.3simulation-based evaluation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Complying With Data Handling Requirements in Cloud Storage SystemsabstractIn past years, cloud storage systems saw an enormous rise in usage. However, despite their popularity and importance as underlying infrastructure for more complex cloud services, today’s cloud storage systems do not account for compliance with regulatory, organizational, or contractual data handling requirements by design. Since legislation increasingly responds to rising data protection and privacy concerns, complying with data handling requirements becomes a crucial property for cloud storage systems. We presentPrada, a practical approach to account for compliance with data handling requirements in key-value based cloud storage systems. To achieve this goal,Pradaintroduces a transparent data handling layer, which empowers clients to request specific data handling requirements and enables operators of cloud storage systems to comply with them. We implementPradaon top of the distributed database Cassandra and show in our evaluation that complying with data handling requirements in cloud storage systems is practical in real-world cloud deployments as used for microblogging, data sharing in the Internet of Things, and distributed email storage. Martin Henze, Roman Matzutt, Jens Hiller, Erik Mühmer, Jan Henrik Ziegeldorf, Johannes van der Giet, Klaus Wehrle |
IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. | 3 |
| 2020 | TrafficSliver: Fighting Website Fingerprinting Attacks with Traffic SplittingabstractWebsite fingerprinting (WFP) aims to infer information about the content of encrypted and anonymized connections by observing patterns of data flows based on the size and direction of packets. By collecting traffic traces at a malicious Tor entry node --- one of the weakest adversaries in the attacker model of Tor --- a passive eavesdropper can leverage the captured meta-data to reveal the websites visited by a Tor user. As recently shown, WFP is significantly more effective and realistic than assumed. Concurrently, former WFP defenses are either infeasible for deployment in real-world settings or defend against specific WFP attacks only. Wladimir De la Cadena, Asya Mitseva, Jens Hiller, Jan Pennekamp, Sebastian Reuter, Julian Filter, Thomas Engel 0001, Klaus Wehrle, Andriy Panchenko 0001 |
CCS | 3 |
| 2020 | The Boon and Bane of Cross-Signing: Shedding Light on a Common Practice in Public Key InfrastructuresabstractPublic Key Infrastructures (PKIs) with their trusted Certificate Authorities (CAs) provide the trust backbone for the Internet: CAs sign certificates which prove the identity of servers, applications, or users. To be trusted by operating systems and browsers, a CA has to undergo lengthy and costly validation processes. Alternatively, trusted CAs can cross-sign other CAs to extend their trust to them. In this paper, we systematically analyze the present and past state of cross-signing in the Web PKI. Our dataset (derived from passive TLS monitors and public CT logs) encompasses more than 7 years and 225 million certificates with 9.3 billion trust paths. We show benefits and risks of cross-signing. We discuss the difficulty of revoking trusted CA certificates where, worrisome, cross-signing can result in valid trust paths to remain after revocation; a problem for non-browser software that often blindly trusts all CA certificates and ignores revocations. However, cross-signing also enables fast bootstrapping of new CAs, e.g., Let's Encrypt, and achieves a non-disruptive user experience by providing backward compatibility. In this paper, we propose new rules and guidance for cross-signing to preserve its positive potential while mitigating its risks. Jens Hiller, Johanna Amann, Oliver Hohlfeld |
CCS | 1 |
| 2019 | POSTER: Traffic Splitting to Counter Website FingerprintingabstractWebsite fingerprinting (WFP) is a special type of traffic analysis, which aims to infer the websites visited by a user. Recent studies have shown that WFP targeting Tor users is notably more effective than previously expected. Concurrently, state-of-the-art defenses have been proven to be less effective. In response, we present a novel WFP defense that splits traffic over multiple entry nodes to limit the data a single malicious entry can use. Here, we explore several traffic-splitting strategies to distribute user traffic. We establish that our weighted random strategy dramatically reduces the accuracy from nearly 95% to less than 35% for four state-of-the-art WFP attacks without adding any artificial delays or dummy traffic. Wladimir De la Cadena, Asya Mitseva, Jan Pennekamp, Jens Hiller, Fabian Lanze, Thomas Engel 0001, Klaus Wehrle, Andriy Panchenko 0001 |
CCS | 4 |
| 2019 | Privacy-Preserving Remote Knowledge SystemabstractMore and more traditional services, such as malware detectors or collaboration services in industrial scenarios, move to the cloud. However, this behavior poses a risk for the privacy of clients since these services are able to generate profiles containing very sensitive information, e.g., vulnerability information or collaboration partners. Hence, a rising need for protocols that enable clients to obtain knowledge without revealing their requests exists. To address this issue, we propose a protocol that enables clients (i) to query large cloud-based knowledge systems in a privacy-preserving manner using Private Set Intersection and (ii) to subsequently obtain individual knowledge items without leaking the client's requests via few Oblivious Transfers. With our preliminary design, we allow clients to save a significant amount of time in comparison to performing Oblivious Transfers only. Markus Dahlmanns, Chris Dax, Roman Matzutt, Jan Pennekamp, Jens Hiller, Klaus Wehrle |
ICNP | 5 |
| 2019 | Tailoring Onion Routing to the Internet of Things: Security and Privacy in Untrusted EnvironmentsabstractAn increasing number of IoT scenarios involve mobile, resource-constrained IoT devices that rely on untrusted networks for Internet connectivity. In such environments, attackers can derive sensitive private information of IoT device owners, e.g., daily routines or secret supply chain procedures, when sniffing on IoT communication and linking IoT devices and owner. Furthermore, untrusted networks do not provide IoT devices with any protection against attacks from the Internet. Anonymous communication using onion routing provides a well-proven mechanism to keep the relationship between communication partners secret and (optionally) protect against network attacks. However, the application of onion routing is challenged by protocol incompatibilities and demanding cryptographic processing on constrained IoT devices, rendering its use infeasible. To close this gap, we tailor onion routing to the IoT by bridging protocol incompatibilities and offloading expensive cryptographic processing to a router or web server of the IoT device owner. Thus, we realize resource-conserving access control and end-to-end security for IoT devices. To prove applicability, we deploy onion routing for the IoT within the well-established Tor network enabling IoT devices to leverage its resources to achieve the same grade of anonymity as readily available to traditional devices. Jens Hiller, Jan Pennekamp, Markus Dahlmanns, Martin Henze, Andriy Panchenko 0001, Klaus Wehrle |
ICNP | 1 |
| 2019 | Multipathing Traffic to Reduce Entry Node Exposure in Onion RoutingabstractUsers of an onion routing network, such as Tor, depend on its anonymity properties. However, especially malicious entry nodes, which know the client's identity, can also observe the whole communication on their link to the client and, thus, conduct several de-anonymization attacks. To limit this exposure and to impede corresponding attacks, we propose to multipath traffic between the client and the middle node to reduce the information an attacker can obtain at a single vantage point. To facilitate the deployment, only clients and selected middle nodes need to implement our approach, which works transparently for the remaining legacy nodes. Furthermore, we let clients control the splitting strategy to prevent any external manipulation. Jan Pennekamp, Jens Hiller, Sebastian Reuter, Wladimir De la Cadena, Asya Mitseva, Martin Henze, Thomas Engel 0001, Klaus Wehrle, Andriy Panchenko 0001 |
ICNP | 2 |
| 2018 | SPLIT: Smart Protocol Loading for the IoT
Torsten Zimmermann, Jens Hiller, Jens Helge Reelfs, Pascal Hein, Klaus Wehrle |
EWSN | 2 |
| 2018 | Giving Customers Control Over Their Data: Integrating a Policy Language into the CloudabstractCloud computing offers the potential to store, manage, and process data in highly available, scalable, and elastic environments. Yet, these environments still provide very limited and inflexible means for customers to control their data. For example, customers can neither specify security of inter-cloud communication bearing the risk of information leakage, nor comply with laws requiring data to be kept in the originating jurisdiction, nor control sharing of data with third parties on a fine-granular basis. This lack of control can hinder cloud adoption for data that falls under regulations. In this paper, we show in six use cases how cloud environments can be enriched with policy language support to give customers control over cloud data. Our use cases are based on realizing policy language support in all three cloud environment layers, i.e., IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS. Specifically, we present policy-aware resource management (with OpenStack) and dynamic network configuration. With CERN's big data storage and the in-memory database Hyrise, we show realization for storage and further exemplify policy-aware cloud processing by network function virtualization which enables Orange to offload customer home gateways to the cloud. Finally, we discuss benefits of policy support in F-Secure's Security Cloud. These use cases show the feasibility of realizing customer control with policy support in the cloud. Thus, our work enables customers with regulated data to tap cloud benefits and significantly broadens the market for cloud providers. Jens Hiller, Maël Kimmerlin, Max Plauth, Seppo Sakari Heikkilä, Stefan Halfpap, Ville Lindfors, Felix Eberhardt, Dariusz Bursztynowski, Jesus Llorente Santos, Oliver Hohlfeld, Klaus Wehrle |
IC2E | 1 |
| 2018 | Thwarting Unwanted Blockchain Content InsertionabstractSince the introduction of Bitcoin in 2008, blockchain systems have seen an enormous increase in adoption. By providing a persistent, distributed, and append-only ledger, blockchains enable numerous applications such as distributed consensus, robustness against equivocation, and smart contracts. However, recent studies show that blockchain systems such as Bitcoin can be (mis) used to store arbitrary content. This has already been used to store arguably objectionable content on Bitcoin's blockchain. Already single instances of clearly objectionable or even illegal content can put the whole system at risk by making its node operators culpable. To overcome this imminent risk, we survey and discuss the design space of countermeasures against the insertion of such objectionable content. Our analysis shows a wide spectrum of potential countermeasures, which are often combinable for increased efficiency. First, we investigate special-purpose content detectors as an ad hoc mitigation. As they turn out to be easily evadable, we also investigate content-agnostic countermeasures. We find that mandatory minimum fees as well as mitigation of transaction manipulability via identifier commitments significantly raise the bar for inserting harmful content into a blockchain. Roman Matzutt, Martin Henze, Jan Henrik Ziegeldorf, Jens Hiller, Klaus Wehrle |
IC2E | 4 |
| 2018 | Secure Low Latency Communication for Constrained Industrial IoT ScenariosabstractThe emerging Internet of Things (IoT) promises value-added services for private and business applications. However, especially the industrial IoT often faces tough communication latency boundaries, e.g., to react to production errors, realize human-robot interaction, or counter fluctuations in smart grids. Simultaneously, devices must apply security measures such as encryption and integrity protection to guard business secrets and prevent sabotage. As security processing requires significant time, the goals of secure communication and low latency contradict each other. Especially on constrained IoT devices, which are equipped with cheap, low-power processors, the overhead for security processing aggregates to a primary source of latency. We show that antedated encryption and data authentication with templates enables IoT devices to meet both, security and low latency requirements. These mechanisms offload significant security processing to a preprocessing phase and thus decrease latency during actual transmission by up to 75.9 %. Thereby they work for well-established security-proven standard ciphers. Jens Hiller, Martin Henze, Martin Serror, Eric Wagner 0003, Jan Niklas Richter, Klaus Wehrle |
LCN | 1 |
| 2017 | Practical Data Compliance for Cloud StorageabstractDespite their increasing proliferation and technical variety, existing cloud storage technologies by design lack support for enforcing compliance with regulatory, organizational, or contractual data handling requirements. However, with legislation responding to rising privacy concerns, this becomes a crucial technical capability for cloud storage systems. In this paper, we introduce PRADA, a practical approach to enforce data compliance in key-value based cloud storage systems. To this end, PRADA introduces a transparent data handling layer which enables clients to specify data handling requirements and provides operators with the technical means to adhere to them. The evaluation of our prototype shows that the modest overheads for supporting data handling requirements in cloud storage systems are practical for real-world deployments. Martin Henze, Roman Matzutt, Jens Hiller, Erik Mühmer, Jan Henrik Ziegeldorf, Johannes van der Giet, Klaus Wehrle |
IC2E | 3 |
| 2016 | Towards Transparent Information on Individual Cloud Service UsageabstractCloud computing allows developers of mobile apps to overcome limited computing, storage, and power resources of modern smartphones. Besides these huge advantages, the hidden utilization of cloud services by mobile apps leads to severe privacy concerns. To overcome these concerns and allow users and companies to properly assess the risks of hidden cloud usage, it is necessary to provide transparency over the cloud services utilized by smartphone apps. In this paper, we present our ongoing work on TRINICS to provide transparent information on individual cloud service usage. To this end, we analyze network traffic of smartphone apps with the goal to detect and uncover cloud usage. We present the resulting statistics on cloud usage to the user and put these numbers into context through anonymous comparison with users' peer groups (i.e., users with similar sociodemographic background and interests). By doing so, we enable users to make an informed decision on suitable means for sufficient self data protection for their future use of apps and cloud services. Martin Henze, Daniel Kerpen, Jens Hiller, Michael Eggert, David Hellmanns, Erik Mühmer, Oussama Renuli, Henning Maier, Christian Stüble, Roger Häußling, Klaus Wehrle |
CloudCom | 3 |
| 2015 | Bandwidth-Optimized Secure Two-Party Computation of Minima
Jan Henrik Ziegeldorf, Jens Hiller, Martin Henze, Hanno Wirtz, Klaus Wehrle |
CANS | 2 |
| 2013 | Tailoring end-to-end IP security protocols to the Internet of ThingsabstractRecent standardization efforts focus on a number of lightweight IP security protocol variants for end-to-end security in the Internet of Things (IoT), most notably DTLS, HIP DEX, and minimal IKEv2. These protocol variants commonly consider public-key-based cryptographic primitives in their protocol design for peer authentication and key agreement. In this paper, we identify several performance and security issues that originate from these public-key-based operations on resource-constrained IoT devices. To illustrate their impact, we additionally quantify these protocol limitations for HIP DEX. Most importantly, we find that public-key-based operations significantly hamper a peer's availability and response time during the protocol handshake. Hence, IP security protocols in the IoT must be tailored to reduce the need for expensive cryptographic operations, to protect resource-constrained peers against DoS attacks targeting these cryptographic operations, and to account for high message processing times. To this end, we present three complementary, lightweight protocol extensions for HIP DEX: i) a comprehensive session resumption mechanism, ii) a collaborative puzzle-based DoS protection mechanism, and iii) a refined retransmission mechanism. Our focus on common protocol functionality allows to generalize our proposed extensions to the wider scope of DTLS and IKE. Finally, our evaluation confirms the considerable achieved improvements at modest trade-offs. René Hummen, Hanno Wirtz, Jan Henrik Ziegeldorf, Jens Hiller, Klaus Wehrle |
ICNP | 4 |
| 2013 | Slimfit - A HIP DEX compression layer for the IP-based Internet of ThingsabstractThe HIP Diet EXchange (DEX) is an end-to-end security protocol designed for constrained network environments in the IP-based Internet of Things (IoT). It is a variant of the IETF-standardized Host Identity Protocol (HIP) with a refined protocol design that targets performance improvements of the original HIP protocol. To stay compatible with existing protocol extensions, the HIP DEX specification thereby aims at preserving the general HIP architecture and protocol semantics. As a result, HIP DEX inherits the verbose HIP packet structure and currently does not consider the available potential to tailor the transmission overhead to constrained IoT environments. In this paper, we present Slimfit, a novel compression layer for HIP DEX. Most importantly, Slimfit i) preserves the HIP DEX security guarantees, ii) allows for stateless (de-)compression at the communication end-points or an on-path gateway, and iii) maintains the flexible packet structure of the original HIP protocol. Moreover, we show that Slimfit is also directly applicable to the original HIP protocol. Our evaluation results indicate a maximum compression ratio of 1.55 for Slimfit-compressed HIP DEX packets. Furthermore, Slimfit reduces HIP DEX packet fragmentation by 25 % and thus further decreases the transmission overhead for lossy network links. Finally, the compression of HIP DEX packets leads to a reduced processing time at the network layers below Slimfit. As a result, processing of Slimfit-compressed packets shows an overall performance gain at the HIP DEX peers. René Hummen, Jens Hiller, Martin Henze, Klaus Wehrle |
WiMob | 2 |
| 2013 | 6LoWPAN fragmentation attacks and mitigation mechanismsabstract6LoWPAN is an IPv6 adaptation layer that defines mechanisms to make IP connectivity viable for tightly resource-constrained devices that communicate over low power, lossy links such as IEEE 802.15.4. It is expected to be used in a variety of scenarios ranging from home automation to industrial control systems. To support the transmission of IPv6 packets exceeding the maximum frame size of the link layer, 6LoWPAN defines a packet fragmentation mechanism. However, the best effort semantics for fragment transmissions, the lack of authentication at the 6LoWPAN layer, and the scarce memory resources of the networked devices render the design of the fragmentation mechanism vulnerable. René Hummen, Jens Hiller, Hanno Wirtz, Martin Henze, Hossein Shafagh, Klaus Wehrle |
WISEC | 2 |