Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mustafa Khan
dblp:128/4573
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% 3D vision · 9% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Rendering · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › language model interpretability
attention sink |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddings · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
embedding analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddings · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddings · NeurIPS 2025 |
Rendering › gaussian splatting
3d gaussian splatting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoSplat: Constrained Gaussian Splatting for Autonomous Driving Scene Reconstruction · ICRA 2025 |
Rendering
neural rendering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoSplat: Constrained Gaussian Splatting for Autonomous Driving Scene Reconstruction · ICRA 2025 |
Rendering
novel view synthesis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | AutoSplat: Constrained Gaussian Splatting for Autonomous Driving Scene Reconstruction · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spherical harmonics · 1.7gaussian splatting · 1.7probing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AutoSplat: Constrained Gaussian Splatting for Autonomous Driving Scene ReconstructionabstractRealistic scene reconstruction and view synthesis are essential for advancing autonomous driving systems by simulating safety-critical scenarios. 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) excels in real-time rendering and static scene reconstructions but struggles with modeling driving scenarios due to complex backgrounds, dynamic objects, and sparse camera views. We propose AutoSplat, a framework employing Gaussian splatting to realistically reconstruct autonomous driving scenes. By imposing geometric constraints on Gaussians representing the road and sky regions, our method enables multi-view consistent simulation of challenging scenarios, including lane changes. Leveraging 3D templates, we introduce a reflected Gaussian consistency constraint to supervise both the visible and unseen side of foreground objects. Moreover, to model the dynamic appearance of foreground objects, we estimate temporally-dependent residual spherical harmonics for each foreground Gaussian. Extensive experiments on Pandaset [1] and KITTI [2] demonstrate that AutoSplat outperforms state-of-the-art methods in scene reconstruction and novel view synthesis across diverse driving scenarios. Our project page can be found here: https://autosplat.github.io/ Mustafa Khan, Hamid R. Fazlali, Dhruv Sharma, Tongtong Cao, Dongfeng Bai |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2025 | Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for EmbeddingsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) often concentrate their attention on a few specific tokens referred to as *attention sinks*. Common examples include the first token, a prompt-independent sink, and punctuation tokens, which are prompt-dependent. While the tokens causing the sinks often lack direct semantic meaning, the presence of the sinks is critical for model performance, particularly under model compression and KV-caching. Despite their ubiquity, the function, semantic role, and origin of attention sinks—especially those beyond the first token—remain poorly understood. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive investigation demonstrating that attention sinks: *catch* a sequence of tokens, *tag* them using a common direction in embedding space, and *release* them back into the residual stream, where tokens are later retrieved based on the tags they have acquired. Probing experiments reveal these tags carry semantically meaningful information, such as the truth of a statement. These findings extend to reasoning models, where the mechanism spans more heads and explains greater variance in embeddings, or recent models with query-key normalization, where sinks remain just as prevalent. To encourage future theoretical analysis, we introduce a minimal problem which can be solved through the 'catch, tag, release' mechanism, and where it emerges through training. Stephen Zhang, Mustafa Khan, Vardan Papyan |
NeurIPS | 2 |