Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mustafa Khan

dblp:128/4573 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% 3D vision · 9%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Rendering · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › language model interpretability
attention sink
0.912025
Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddings · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
embedding analysis
0.912025
Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddings · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability
0.912025
Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddings · NeurIPS 2025
Rendering › gaussian splatting
3d gaussian splatting
0.912025
AutoSplat: Constrained Gaussian Splatting for Autonomous Driving Scene Reconstruction · ICRA 2025
Rendering
neural rendering
0.912025
AutoSplat: Constrained Gaussian Splatting for Autonomous Driving Scene Reconstruction · ICRA 2025
Rendering
novel view synthesis
0.312025
AutoSplat: Constrained Gaussian Splatting for Autonomous Driving Scene Reconstruction · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spherical harmonics · 1.7gaussian splatting · 1.7probing · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AutoSplat: Constrained Gaussian Splatting for Autonomous Driving Scene Reconstruction
abstract
Realistic scene reconstruction and view synthesis are essential for advancing autonomous driving systems by simulating safety-critical scenarios. 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) excels in real-time rendering and static scene reconstructions but struggles with modeling driving scenarios due to complex backgrounds, dynamic objects, and sparse camera views. We propose AutoSplat, a framework employing Gaussian splatting to realistically reconstruct autonomous driving scenes. By imposing geometric constraints on Gaussians representing the road and sky regions, our method enables multi-view consistent simulation of challenging scenarios, including lane changes. Leveraging 3D templates, we introduce a reflected Gaussian consistency constraint to supervise both the visible and unseen side of foreground objects. Moreover, to model the dynamic appearance of foreground objects, we estimate temporally-dependent residual spherical harmonics for each foreground Gaussian. Extensive experiments on Pandaset [1] and KITTI [2] demonstrate that AutoSplat outperforms state-of-the-art methods in scene reconstruction and novel view synthesis across diverse driving scenarios. Our project page can be found here: https://autosplat.github.io/
Mustafa Khan, Hamid R. Fazlali, Dhruv Sharma, Tongtong Cao, Dongfeng Bai
ICRA1
2025 Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddings
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often concentrate their attention on a few specific tokens referred to as *attention sinks*. Common examples include the first token, a prompt-independent sink, and punctuation tokens, which are prompt-dependent. While the tokens causing the sinks often lack direct semantic meaning, the presence of the sinks is critical for model performance, particularly under model compression and KV-caching. Despite their ubiquity, the function, semantic role, and origin of attention sinks—especially those beyond the first token—remain poorly understood. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive investigation demonstrating that attention sinks: *catch* a sequence of tokens, *tag* them using a common direction in embedding space, and *release* them back into the residual stream, where tokens are later retrieved based on the tags they have acquired. Probing experiments reveal these tags carry semantically meaningful information, such as the truth of a statement. These findings extend to reasoning models, where the mechanism spans more heads and explains greater variance in embeddings, or recent models with query-key normalization, where sinks remain just as prevalent. To encourage future theoretical analysis, we introduce a minimal problem which can be solved through the 'catch, tag, release' mechanism, and where it emerges through training.
Stephen Zhang, Mustafa Khan, Vardan Papyan
NeurIPS2