Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vladislav Saveliev

dblp:128/7501 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-0853-1482ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly
assembly quality assessment
0.832018
Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG · Bioinform. 2018
Icarus: visualizer for de novo assembly evaluation · Bioinform. 2016
MetaQUAST: evaluation of metagenome assemblies · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly
0.842018
Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG · Bioinform. 2018
Icarus: visualizer for de novo assembly evaluation · Bioinform. 2016
QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies · Bioinform. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
assembly visualization
0.212016
Icarus: visualizer for de novo assembly evaluation · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics
0.212016
MetaQUAST: evaluation of metagenome assemblies · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
metagenomic assembly
0.212016
MetaQUAST: evaluation of metagenome assemblies · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly quality assessment
0.212013
QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies · Bioinform. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
long-read sequencing
0.112018
Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112016
Icarus: visualizer for de novo assembly evaluation · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
next-generation sequencing data analysis
0.112016
Icarus: visualizer for de novo assembly evaluation · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

upper bound assembly computation · 0.3reference-based assembly comparison · 0.3reference-based assembly assessment · 0.2chimeric contig detection · 0.2alignment-based contig evaluation · 0.2reference-free evaluation · 0.2reference-based evaluation · 0.2quality metrics · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG
abstract
Motivation: The emergence of high-throughput sequencing technologies revolutionized genomics in early 2000s. The next revolution came with the era of long-read sequencing. These technological advances along with novel computational approaches became the next step towards the automatic pipelines capable to assemble nearly complete mammalian-size genomes. Results: In this manuscript, we demonstrate performance of the state-of-the-art genome assembly software on six eukaryotic datasets sequenced using different technologies. To evaluate the results, we developed QUAST-LG-a tool that compares large genomic de novo assemblies against reference sequences and computes relevant quality metrics. Since genomes generally cannot be reconstructed completely due to complex repeat patterns and low coverage regions, we introduce a concept of upper bound assembly for a given genome and set of reads, and compute theoretical limits on assembly correctness and completeness. Using QUAST-LG, we show how close the assemblies are to the theoretical optimum, and how far this optimum is from the finished reference. Availability and implementation: http://cab.spbu.ru/software/quast-lg. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Alla Mikheenko, Andrey D. Prjibelski, Vladislav Saveliev, Dmitry Antipov, Alexey A. Gurevich
Bioinform.3
2016 MetaQUAST: evaluation of metagenome assemblies
abstract
UNLABELLED: During the past years we have witnessed the rapid development of new metagenome assembly methods. Although there are many benchmark utilities designed for single-genome assemblies, there is no well-recognized evaluation and comparison tool for metagenomic-specific analogues. In this article, we present MetaQUAST, a modification of QUAST, the state-of-the-art tool for genome assembly evaluation based on alignment of contigs to a reference. MetaQUAST addresses such metagenome datasets features as (i) unknown species content by detecting and downloading reference sequences, (ii) huge diversity by giving comprehensive reports for multiple genomes and (iii) presence of highly relative species by detecting chimeric contigs. We demonstrate MetaQUAST performance by comparing several leading assemblers on one simulated and two real datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://bioinf.spbau.ru/metaquast CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Alla Mikheenko, Vladislav Saveliev, Alexey A. Gurevich
Bioinform.2
2016 Icarus: visualizer for de novo assembly evaluation
abstract
: Data visualization plays an increasingly important role in NGS data analysis. With advances in both sequencing and computational technologies, it has become a new bottleneck in genomics studies. Indeed, evaluation of de novo genome assemblies is one of the areas that can benefit from the visualization. However, even though multiple quality assessment methods are now available, existing visualization tools are hardly suitable for this purpose. Here, we present Icarus-a novel genome visualizer for accurate assessment and analysis of genomic draft assemblies, which is based on the tool QUAST. Icarus can be used in studies where a related reference genome is available, as well as for non-model organisms. The tool is available online and as a standalone application. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://cab.spbu.ru/software/icarus CONTACT: [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Alla Mikheenko, Gleb Valin, Andrey D. Prjibelski, Vladislav Saveliev, Alexey A. Gurevich
Bioinform.4
2013 QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies
abstract
SUMMARY: Limitations of genome sequencing techniques have led to dozens of assembly algorithms, none of which is perfect. A number of methods for comparing assemblers have been developed, but none is yet a recognized benchmark. Further, most existing methods for comparing assemblies are only applicable to new assemblies of finished genomes; the problem of evaluating assemblies of previously unsequenced species has not been adequately considered. Here, we present QUAST-a quality assessment tool for evaluating and comparing genome assemblies. This tool improves on leading assembly comparison software with new ideas and quality metrics. QUAST can evaluate assemblies both with a reference genome, as well as without a reference. QUAST produces many reports, summary tables and plots to help scientists in their research and in their publications. In this study, we used QUAST to compare several genome assemblers on three datasets. QUAST tables and plots for all of them are available in the Supplementary Material, and interactive versions of these reports are on the QUAST website. AVAILABILITY: http://bioinf.spbau.ru/quast . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Alexey A. Gurevich, Vladislav Saveliev, Nikolay Vyahhi, Glenn Tesler
Bioinform.2