Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Trupti Telang

dblp:129/2036 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 50% Collaborative and social computing · 50%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
information seeking
0.212013
Costs and benefits of structured information foraging · CHI 2013
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval
sensemaking
0.212013
Costs and benefits of structured information foraging · CHI 2013
Collaborative and social computing
information sharing
0.012013
Costs and benefits of structured information foraging · CHI 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled experiment · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Costs and benefits of structured information foraging
abstract
People spend an enormous amount of time searching for and saving information online. Existing tools capture only a small portion of the cognitive processing a user engages in while making sense of a new domain. In this paper we introduce a novel interface for capturing online information in a structured but lightweight way. We use this interface as a platform to experimentally characterize the costs and benefits of structuring information during the sensemaking process. Our results contribute empirical knowledge relevant to theories of information seeking and sensemaking, and practical implications for the development of tools to capture and share online information.
Aniket Kittur, Andrew M. Peters, Abdigani Diriye, Trupti Telang, Michael R. Bove
CHI4