Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeffrey Lund

dblp:129/5494 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 84% Information retrieval · 16%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling
0.722019
Automatic Evaluation of Local Topic Quality · ACL (1) 2019
Tandem Anchoring: a Multiword Anchor Approach for Interactive Topic Modeling · ACL (1) 2017
Information retrieval › evaluation › evaluation methodology
automatic evaluation
0.412019
Automatic Evaluation of Local Topic Quality · ACL (1) 2019
Data mining › text mining › topic model
topic quality evaluation
0.412019
Automatic Evaluation of Local Topic Quality · ACL (1) 2019
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.312018
Labeled Anchors and a Scalable, Transparent, and Interactive Classifier · EMNLP 2018
Data mining › text mining
topic model
0.312018
Labeled Anchors and a Scalable, Transparent, and Interactive Classifier · EMNLP 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate
0.312017
Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic Modeling · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
online topic modeling
0.312017
Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic Modeling · EMNLP 2017
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.312017
Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic Modeling · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.312017
Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic Modeling · EMNLP 2017
Data mining › text mining › topic model
interactive topic modeling
0.312017
Tandem Anchoring: a Multiword Anchor Approach for Interactive Topic Modeling · ACL (1) 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topic coherence metrics · 0.4vector-space representation · 0.3anchor words algorithm · 0.3user study · 0.3tandem anchors · 0.3stochastic variational inference · 0.3adagrad · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Automatic Evaluation of Local Topic Quality
abstract
Jeffrey Lund, Piper Armstrong, Wilson Fearn, Stephen Cowley, Courtni Byun, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Kevin Seppi. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2019.
Jeffrey Lund, Piper Armstrong, Wilson Fearn, Stephen Cowley, Courtni Byun, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, Kevin D. Seppi
ACL (1)1
2018 Labeled Anchors and a Scalable, Transparent, and Interactive Classifier
abstract
We propose Labeled Anchors, an interactive and supervised topic model based on the anchor words algorithm (Arora et al., 2013).Labeled Anchors is similar to Supervised Anchors (Nguyen et al., 2014) in that it extends the vector-space representation of words to include document labels.However, our formulation also admits a classifier which requires no training beyond inferring topics, which means our approach is also fast enough to be interactive.We run a small user study that demonstrates that untrained users can interactively update topics in order to improve classification accuracy.
Jeffrey Lund, Stephen Cowley, Wilson Fearn, Emily Hales, Kevin D. Seppi
EMNLP1
2017 Tandem Anchoring: a Multiword Anchor Approach for Interactive Topic Modeling
abstract
Interactive topic models are powerful tools for understanding large collections of text.However, existing sampling-based interactive topic modeling approaches scale poorly to large data sets.Anchor methods, which use a single word to uniquely identify a topic, offer the speed needed for interactive work but lack both a mechanism to inject prior knowledge and lack the intuitive semantics needed for userfacing applications.We propose combinations of words as anchors, going beyond existing single word anchor algorithmsan approach we call "Tandem Anchors".We begin with a synthetic investigation of this approach then apply the approach to interactive topic modeling in a user study and compare it to interactive and noninteractive approaches.Tandem anchors are faster and more intuitive than existing interactive approaches.
Jeffrey Lund, Connor Cook, Kevin D. Seppi, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
ACL (1)1
2017 Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic Modeling
abstract
Online topic modeling, i.e., topic modeling with stochastic variational inference, is a powerful and efficient technique for analyzing large datasets, and ADAGRAD is a widely-used technique for tuning learning rates during online gradient optimization.However, these two techniques do not work well together.We show that this is because ADAGRAD uses accumulation of previous gradients as the learning rates' denominators.For online topic modeling, the magnitude of gradients is very large.It causes learning rates to shrink very quickly, so the parameters cannot fully converge until the training ends.
You Lu 0003, Jeffrey Lund, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
EMNLP2
2016 Fast Inference for Interactive Models of Text
abstract
Probabilistic models are a useful means for analyzing large text corpora. Integrating such models with human interaction enables many new use cases. However, adding human interaction to probabilistic models requires inference algorithms which are both fast and accurate. We explore the use of Iterated Conditional Modes as a fast alternative to Gibbs sampling or variational EM. We demonstrate superior performance both in run time and model quality on three different models of text including a DP Mixture of Multinomials for web search result clustering, the Interactive Topic Model, and M OM R ESP , a multinomial crowdsourcing model.
Jeffrey Lund, Paul Felt, Kevin D. Seppi, Eric K. Ringger
COLING1
2015 Is Your Anchor Going Up or Down? Fast and Accurate Supervised Topic Models
abstract
Thang Nguyen, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Jeffrey Lund, Kevin Seppi, Eric Ringger. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015.
Thang Nguyen 0001, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, Jeffrey Lund, Kevin D. Seppi, Eric K. Ringger
HLT-NAACL3