Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jeffrey Lund
dblp:129/5494
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 84% Information retrieval · 16% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Automatic Evaluation of Local Topic Quality · ACL (1) 2019 Tandem Anchoring: a Multiword Anchor Approach for Interactive Topic Modeling · ACL (1) 2017 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › evaluation methodology
automatic evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Automatic Evaluation of Local Topic Quality · ACL (1) 2019 |
Data mining › text mining › topic model
topic quality evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Automatic Evaluation of Local Topic Quality · ACL (1) 2019 |
Data mining › text mining
text classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Labeled Anchors and a Scalable, Transparent, and Interactive Classifier · EMNLP 2018 |
Data mining › text mining
topic model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Labeled Anchors and a Scalable, Transparent, and Interactive Classifier · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic Modeling · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
online topic modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic Modeling · EMNLP 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic Modeling · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic Modeling · EMNLP 2017 |
Data mining › text mining › topic model
interactive topic modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Tandem Anchoring: a Multiword Anchor Approach for Interactive Topic Modeling · ACL (1) 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
topic coherence metrics · 0.4vector-space representation · 0.3anchor words algorithm · 0.3user study · 0.3tandem anchors · 0.3stochastic variational inference · 0.3adagrad · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Automatic Evaluation of Local Topic QualityabstractJeffrey Lund, Piper Armstrong, Wilson Fearn, Stephen Cowley, Courtni Byun, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Kevin Seppi. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2019. Jeffrey Lund, Piper Armstrong, Wilson Fearn, Stephen Cowley, Courtni Byun, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, Kevin D. Seppi |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | Labeled Anchors and a Scalable, Transparent, and Interactive ClassifierabstractWe propose Labeled Anchors, an interactive and supervised topic model based on the anchor words algorithm (Arora et al., 2013).Labeled Anchors is similar to Supervised Anchors (Nguyen et al., 2014) in that it extends the vector-space representation of words to include document labels.However, our formulation also admits a classifier which requires no training beyond inferring topics, which means our approach is also fast enough to be interactive.We run a small user study that demonstrates that untrained users can interactively update topics in order to improve classification accuracy. Jeffrey Lund, Stephen Cowley, Wilson Fearn, Emily Hales, Kevin D. Seppi |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2017 | Tandem Anchoring: a Multiword Anchor Approach for Interactive Topic ModelingabstractInteractive topic models are powerful tools for understanding large collections of text.However, existing sampling-based interactive topic modeling approaches scale poorly to large data sets.Anchor methods, which use a single word to uniquely identify a topic, offer the speed needed for interactive work but lack both a mechanism to inject prior knowledge and lack the intuitive semantics needed for userfacing applications.We propose combinations of words as anchors, going beyond existing single word anchor algorithmsan approach we call "Tandem Anchors".We begin with a synthetic investigation of this approach then apply the approach to interactive topic modeling in a user study and compare it to interactive and noninteractive approaches.Tandem anchors are faster and more intuitive than existing interactive approaches. Jeffrey Lund, Connor Cook, Kevin D. Seppi, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2017 | Why ADAGRAD Fails for Online Topic ModelingabstractOnline topic modeling, i.e., topic modeling with stochastic variational inference, is a powerful and efficient technique for analyzing large datasets, and ADAGRAD is a widely-used technique for tuning learning rates during online gradient optimization.However, these two techniques do not work well together.We show that this is because ADAGRAD uses accumulation of previous gradients as the learning rates' denominators.For online topic modeling, the magnitude of gradients is very large.It causes learning rates to shrink very quickly, so the parameters cannot fully converge until the training ends. You Lu 0003, Jeffrey Lund, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2016 | Fast Inference for Interactive Models of TextabstractProbabilistic models are a useful means for analyzing large text corpora. Integrating such models with human interaction enables many new use cases. However, adding human interaction to probabilistic models requires inference algorithms which are both fast and accurate. We explore the use of Iterated Conditional Modes as a fast alternative to Gibbs sampling or variational EM. We demonstrate superior performance both in run time and model quality on three different models of text including a DP Mixture of Multinomials for web search result clustering, the Interactive Topic Model, and M OM R ESP , a multinomial crowdsourcing model. Jeffrey Lund, Paul Felt, Kevin D. Seppi, Eric K. Ringger |
COLING | 1 |
| 2015 | Is Your Anchor Going Up or Down? Fast and Accurate Supervised Topic ModelsabstractThang Nguyen, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Jeffrey Lund, Kevin Seppi, Eric Ringger. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015. Thang Nguyen 0001, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, Jeffrey Lund, Kevin D. Seppi, Eric K. Ringger |
HLT-NAACL | 3 |