Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sanvesh Srivastava

dblp:129/6042 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 76% Learning theory · 12% Efficient and distributed learning · 12%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
1.442022
Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Scalable Bayes via Barycenter in Wasserstein Space · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Robust and Scalable Bayes via a Median of Subset Posterior Measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
scalable bayesian inference
0.832018
Scalable Bayes via Barycenter in Wasserstein Space · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Robust and Scalable Bayes via a Median of Subset Posterior Measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Scalable and Robust Bayesian Inference via the Median Posterior · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › probabilistic regression
bayesian regression
0.612022
Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed inference
distributed bayesian inference
0.612022
Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
varying coefficient model
0.612022
Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference
0.312018
Scalable Bayes via Barycenter in Wasserstein Space · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › generalized bayesian inference
robust bayesian inference
0.312017
Robust and Scalable Bayes via a Median of Subset Posterior Measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › posterior inference
posterior aggregation
0.212014
Scalable and Robust Bayesian Inference via the Median Posterior · ICML 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

divide-and-conquer · 0.9gaussian process · 0.6data augmentation · 0.6MCMC · 0.6wasserstein barycenter · 0.3markov chain monte carlo · 0.3wasserstein distance · 0.3median of probability measures · 0.3geometric median · 0.2distributed computing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior
abstract
Varying coefficient models (VCMs) are widely used for estimating nonlinear regression functions for functional data. Their Bayesian variants using Gaussian process priors on the functional coefficients, however, have received limited attention in massive data applications, mainly due to the prohibitively slow posterior computations using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. We address this problem using a divide-and-conquer Bayesian approach. We first create a large number of data subsamples with much smaller sizes. Then, we formulate the VCM as a linear mixed-effects model and develop a data augmentation algorithm for obtaining MCMC draws on all the subsets in parallel. Finally, we aggregate the MCMC-based estimates of subset posteriors into a single Aggregated Monte Carlo (AMC) posterior, which is used as a computationally efficient alternative to the true posterior distribution. Theoretically, we derive minimax optimal posterior convergence rates for the AMC posteriors of both the varying coefficients and the mean regression function. We provide quantification on the orders of subset sample sizes and the number of subsets. The empirical results show that the combination schemes that satisfy our theoretical assumptions, including the AMC posterior, have better estimation performance than their main competitors across diverse simulations and in a real data analysis.
Rajarshi Guhaniyogi, Cheng Li 0063, Terrance D. Savitsky, Sanvesh Srivastava
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2018 Scalable Bayes via Barycenter in Wasserstein Space
abstract
Divide-and-conquer based methods for Bayesian inference provide a general approach for tractable posterior inference when the sample size is large. These methods divide the data into smaller subsets, sample from the posterior distribution of parameters in parallel on all the subsets, and combine posterior samples from all the subsets to approximate the full data posterior distribution. The smaller size of any subset compared to the full data implies that posterior sampling on any subset is computationally more efficient than sampling from the true posterior distribution. Since the combination step takes negligible time relative to sampling, posterior computations can be scaled to massive data by dividing the full data into sufficiently large number of data subsets. One such approach relies on the geometry of posterior distributions estimated across different subsets and combines them through their barycenter in a Wasserstein space of probability measures. We provide theoretical guarantees on the accuracy of approximation that are valid in many applications. We show that the geometric method approximates the full data posterior distribution better than its competitors across diverse simulations and reproduces known results when applied to a movie ratings database.
Sanvesh Srivastava, David B. Dunson
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2017 Robust and Scalable Bayes via a Median of Subset Posterior Measures
abstract
We propose a novel approach to Bayesian analysis that is provably robust to outliers in the data and often has computational advantages over standard methods. Our technique is based on splitting the data into non-overlapping subgroups, evaluating the posterior distribution given each independent subgroup, and then combining the resulting measures. The main novelty of our approach is the proposed aggregation step, which is based on the evaluation of a median in the space of probability measures equipped with a suitable collection of distances that can be quickly and efficiently evaluated in practice. We present both theoretical and numerical evidence illustrating the improvements achieved by our method.
Stanislav Minsker, Sanvesh Srivastava, Lizhen Lin, David B. Dunson
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2015 WASP: Scalable Bayes via barycenters of subset posteriors
abstract
The promise of Bayesian methods for big data sets has not fully been realized due to the lack of scalable computational algorithms. For massive data, it is necessary to store and process subsets on different machines in a distributed manner. We propose a simple, general, and highly efficient approach, which first runs a posterior sampling algorithm in parallel on different machines for subsets of a large data set. To combine these subset posteriors, we calculate the Wasserstein barycenter via a highly efficient linear program. The resulting estimate for the Wasserstein posterior (WASP) has an atomic form, facilitating straightforward estimation of posterior summaries of functionals of interest. The WASP approach allows posterior sampling algorithms for smaller data sets to be trivially scaled to huge data. We provide theoretical justification in terms of posterior consistency and algorithm efficiency. Examples are provided in complex settings including Gaussian process regression and nonparametric Bayes mixture models.
Sanvesh Srivastava, Volkan Cevher, Quoc Tran-Dinh, David B. Dunson
AISTATS1
2014 Scalable and Robust Bayesian Inference via the Median Posterior
abstract
Many Bayesian learning methods for massive data benefit from working with small subsets of observations. In particular, significant progress has been made in scalable Bayesian learning via stochastic approximation. However, Bayesian learning methods in distributed computing environments are often problem- or distribution-specific and use ad hoc techniques. We propose a novel general approach to Bayesian inference that is scalable and robust to corruption in the data. Our technique is based on the idea of splitting the data into several non-overlapping subgroups, evaluating the posterior distribution given each independent subgroup, and then combining the results. The main novelty is the proposed aggregation step which is based on finding the geometric median of posterior distributions. We present both theoretical and numerical results illustrating the advantages of our approach.
Stanislav Minsker, Sanvesh Srivastava, Lizhen Lin, David B. Dunson
ICML2