Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Petteri Räty

dblp:129/8210 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education › software engineering education
global software engineering education
0.212013
Teaching students global software engineering skills using distributed scrum · ICSE 2013
Computing education
software engineering education
0.212013
Teaching students global software engineering skills using distributed scrum · ICSE 2013
Empirical software engineering
collaborative software development
0.212013
Teaching students global software engineering skills using distributed scrum · ICSE 2013
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
global software development
0.212013
Teaching students global software engineering skills using distributed scrum · ICSE 2013
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.012013
Teaching students global software engineering skills using distributed scrum · ICSE 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

questionnaire · 0.3observation · 0.3mixed-method study · 0.3interviews · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Teaching students global software engineering skills using distributed scrum
abstract
In this paper we describe distributed Scrum augmented with best practices in global software engineering (GSE) as an important paradigm for teaching critical competencies in GSE. We report on a globally distributed project course between the University of Victoria, Canada and Aalto University, Finland. The project-driven course involved 16 students in Canada and 9 students in Finland, divided into three cross-site Scrum teams working on a single large project. To assess learning of GSE competencies we employed a mixed-method approach including 13 post-course interviews, pre-, post-course and iteration questionnaires, observations, recordings of Daily Scrums as well as collection of project asynchronous communication data. Our analysis indicates that the Scrum method, along with supporting collaboration practices and tools, supports the learning of important GSE competencies, such as distributed communication and teamwork, building and maintaining trust, using appropriate collaboration tools, and inter-cultural collaboration.
Maria Paasivaara, Casper Lassenius, Daniela E. Damian, Petteri Räty, Adrian Schröter
ICSE4