Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jaewoo Song

dblp:129/8272 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1877-5731ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 87% 3D vision · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image restoration
diffusion-based inpainting
0.912025
DefectFill: Realistic Defect Generation with Inpainting Diffusion Model for Visual Inspection · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
DefectFill: Realistic Defect Generation with Inpainting Diffusion Model for Visual Inspection · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
visual inspection
0.312025
DefectFill: Realistic Defect Generation with Inpainting Diffusion Model for Visual Inspection · CVPR 2025
Debugging and program repair
automated program repair
0.212013
Automatic patch generation learned from human-written patches · ICSE 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

low-fidelity selection · 1.7inpainting diffusion · 1.7custom loss functions · 0.9custom loss function · 0.9genetic programming · 0.2fix pattern mining · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DCText: Scheduled Attention Masking for Visual Text Generation via Divide-and-Conquer Strategy
abstract
Despite recent text-to-image models achieving high-fidelity text rendering, they still struggle with long or multiple texts due to diluted global attention. We propose DC-Text, a training-free visual text generation method that adopts a divide-and-conquer strategy, leveraging the reliable short-text generation of Multi-Modal Diffusion Transformers. Our method first decomposes a prompt by extracting and dividing the target text, then assigns each to a designated region. To accurately render each segment within their regions while preserving overall image coherence, we introduce two attention masks—Text-Focus and Context-Expansion—applied sequentially during denoising. Additionally, Localized Noise Initialization further improves text accuracy and region alignment without increasing computational cost. Extensive experiments on single- and multi-sentence benchmarks show that DCText achieves the best text accuracy without compromising image quality while also delivering the lowest generation latency.
Jaewoo Song, Jooyoung Choi 0001, Kanghyun Baek, Sangyub Lee 0005, Daemin Park, Sungroh Yoon
WACV1
2025 DefectFill: Realistic Defect Generation with Inpainting Diffusion Model for Visual Inspection
abstract
Developing effective visual inspection models remains challenging due to the scarcity of defect data. While image generation models have been used to synthesize defect images, producing highly realistic defects remains difficult. We propose DefectFill, a novel method for realistic defect generation that requires only a few reference defect images. It leverages a fine-tuned inpainting diffusion model, optimized with our custom loss functions incorporating defect, object, and attention terms. It enables precise capture of detailed, localized defect features and their seamless integration into defect-free objects. Additionally, our Low-Fidelity Selection method further enhances the defect sample quality. Experiments show that DefectFill generates high-quality defect images, enabling visual inspection models to achieve state- of-the-art performance on the MVTec AD dataset.
Jaewoo Song, Daemin Park, Kanghyun Baek, Sangyub Lee 0005, Jooyoung Choi 0001, Eunji Kim 0002, Sungroh Yoon
CVPR1
2013 Automatic patch generation learned from human-written patches
abstract
Patch generation is an essential software maintenance task because most software systems inevitably have bugs that need to be fixed. Unfortunately, human resources are often insufficient to fix all reported and known bugs. To address this issue, several automated patch generation techniques have been proposed. In particular, a genetic-programming-based patch generation technique, GenProg, proposed by Weimer et al., has shown promising results. However, these techniques can generate nonsensical patches due to the randomness of their mutation operations. To address this limitation, we propose a novel patch generation approach, Pattern-based Automatic program Repair (Par), using fix patterns learned from existing human-written patches. We manually inspected more than 60,000 human-written patches and found there are several common fix patterns. Our approach leverages these fix patterns to generate program patches automatically. We experimentally evaluated Par on 119 real bugs. In addition, a user study involving 89 students and 164 developers confirmed that patches generated by our approach are more acceptable than those generated by GenProg. Par successfully generated patches for 27 out of 119 bugs, while GenProg was successful for only 16 bugs.
Dongsun Kim 0001, Jaechang Nam, Jaewoo Song, Sunghun Kim 0001
ICSE3