The SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming framework SCIP . The focus of this article is on the role of the SCIP Optimization Suite in supporting research. SCIP ’s main design principles are discussed, followed by a presentation of the latest performance improvements and developments in version 8.0, which serve both as examples of SCIP ’s application as a research tool and as a platform for further developments. Furthermore, this article gives an overview of interfaces to other programming and modeling languages, new features that expand the possibilities for user interaction with the framework, and the latest developments in several extensions built upon SCIP .

The generalization of mixed integer program (MIP) techniques to deal with nonlinear, potentially nonconvex, constraints has been a fruitful direction of research for computational mixed integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) in the last decade. In this paper, we follow that path in order to extend another essential subroutine of modern MIP solvers toward the case of nonlinear optimization: the analysis of infeasible subproblems for learning additional valid constraints. To this end, we derive two different strategies, geared toward two different solution approaches. These are using local dual proofs of infeasibility for LP-based branch-and-bound and the creation of nonlinear dual proofs for NLP-based branch-and-bound, respectively. We discuss implementation details of both approaches and present an extensive computational study, showing that both techniques can significantly enhance performance when solving MINLPs to global optimality. Summary of Contribution: This original article concerns the advancement of exact general-purpose algorithms for solving one of the largest and most prominent problem classes in optimization, mixed integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs). It demonstrates how methods for conflict analysis that learn from infeasible subproblems can be transferred to nonlinear optimization. Further, it develops theory for how nonlinear dual infeasibility proofs can be derived from a nonlinear relaxation. This paper features a thoroughly computational study regarding the impact of conflict analysis techniques on the overall performance of a state-of-the-art MINLP solver when solving MINLPs to global optimality.

Two essential ingredients of modern mixed-integer programming solvers are diving heuristics, which simulate a partial depth-first search in a branch-and-bound tree, and conflict analysis, which learns valid constraints from infeasible subproblems. So far, these techniques have mostly been studied independently: primal heuristics for finding high-quality feasible solutions early during the solving process and conflict analysis for fathoming nodes of the search tree and improving the dual bound. In this paper, we pose the question of whether and how the orthogonal goals of proving infeasibility and generating improving solutions can be pursued in a combined manner such that a state-of-the-art solver can benefit. To do so, we integrate both concepts in two different ways. First, we develop a diving heuristic that simultaneously targets the generation of valid conflict constraints from the Farkas dual and the generation of improving solutions. We show that, in the primal, this is equivalent to the optimistic strategy of diving toward the best bound with respect to the objective function. Second, we use information derived from conflict analysis to enhance the search of a diving heuristic akin to classic coefficient diving. In a detailed computational study, both methods are evaluated on the basis of an implementation in the source-open-solver SCIP. The experimental results underline the potential of combining both diving heuristics and conflict analysis. Summary of Contribution. This original article concerns the advancement of exact general-purpose algorithms for solving one of the largest and most prominent problem classes in optimization, mixed-integer linear programs. It demonstrates how methods for conflict analysis that learn from infeasible subproblems can be combined successfully with diving heuristics that aim at finding primal solutions. For two newly designed diving heuristics, this paper features a thoroughly computational study regarding their impact on the overall performance of a state-of-the-art MIP solver.