Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrea Brovelli
dblp:13/11370
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5342-1330ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 88% Medical and health informatics · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
brain connectivity analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information theory › information measures › multiterminal information measures
directed information |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information theory › network information theory
information flow |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
EEG/MEG analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural signal analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wiener-granger causality · 1.3information-theoretic measures · 0.7information-theoretic measure · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regionsabstractQuantifying the amount, content and direction of communication between brain regions is key to understanding brain function. Traditional methods to analyze brain activity based on the Wiener-Granger causality principle quantify the overall information propagated by neural activity between simultaneously recorded brain regions, but do not reveal the information flow about specific features of interest (such as sensory stimuli). Here, we develop a new information theoretic measure termed Feature-specific Information Transfer (FIT), quantifying how much information about a specific feature flows between two regions. FIT merges the Wiener-Granger causality principle with information-content specificity. We first derive FIT and prove analytically its key properties. We then illustrate and test them with simulations of neural activity, demonstrating that FIT identifies, within the total information propagated between regions, the information that is transmitted about specific features. We then analyze three neural datasets obtained with different recording methods, magneto- and electro-encephalography, and spiking activity, to demonstrate the ability of FIT to uncover the content and direction of information flow between brain regions beyond what can be discerned with traditional analytical methods. FIT can improve our understanding of how brain regions communicate by uncovering previously unaddressed feature-specific information flow. Marco Celotto, Jan Bím, Alejandro Tlaie, Vito De Feo, Alessandro Toso, Stefan Lemke, Daniel Chicharro, Hamed Nili, Malte Bieler, Ileana L. Hanganu-Opatz, Tobias Donner, Andrea Brovelli, Stefano Panzeri |
NeurIPS | 12 |
| 2020 | A generative spiking neural-network model of goal-directed behaviour and one-step planningabstractIn mammals, goal-directed and planning processes support flexible behaviour used to face new situations that cannot be tackled through more efficient but rigid habitual behaviours. Within the Bayesian modelling approach of brain and behaviour, models have been proposed to perform planning as probabilistic inference but this approach encounters a crucial problem: explaining how such inference might be implemented in brain spiking networks. Recently, the literature has proposed some models that face this problem through recurrent spiking neural networks able to internally simulate state trajectories, the core function at the basis of planning. However, the proposed models have relevant limitations that make them biologically implausible, namely their world model is trained 'off-line' before solving the target tasks, and they are trained with supervised learning procedures that are biologically and ecologically not plausible. Here we propose two novel hypotheses on how brain might overcome these problems, and operationalise them in a novel architecture pivoting on a spiking recurrent neural network. The first hypothesis allows the architecture to learn the world model in parallel with its use for planning: to this purpose, a new arbitration mechanism decides when to explore, for learning the world model, or when to exploit it, for planning, based on the entropy of the world model itself. The second hypothesis allows the architecture to use an unsupervised learning process to learn the world model by observing the effects of actions. The architecture is validated by reproducing and accounting for the learning profiles and reaction times of human participants learning to solve a visuomotor learning task that is new for them. Overall, the architecture represents the first instance of a model bridging probabilistic planning and spiking-processes that has a degree of autonomy analogous to the one of real organisms. Ruggero Basanisi, Andrea Brovelli, Emilio Cartoni, Gianluca Baldassarre |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2020 | Tensorpac: An open-source Python toolbox for tensor-based phase-amplitude coupling measurement in electrophysiological brain signalsabstractDespite being the focus of a thriving field of research, the biological mechanisms that underlie information integration in the brain are not yet fully understood. A theory that has gained a lot of traction in recent years suggests that multi-scale integration is regulated by a hierarchy of mutually interacting neural oscillations. In particular, there is accumulating evidence that phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), a specific form of cross-frequency interaction, plays a key role in numerous cognitive processes. Current research in the field is not only hampered by the absence of a gold standard for PAC analysis, but also by the computational costs of running exhaustive computations on large and high-dimensional electrophysiological brain signals. In addition, various signal properties and analyses parameters can lead to spurious PAC. Here, we present Tensorpac, an open-source Python toolbox dedicated to PAC analysis of neurophysiological data. The advantages of Tensorpac include (1) higher computational efficiency thanks to software design that combines tensor computations and parallel computing, (2) the implementation of all most widely used PAC methods in one package, (3) the statistical analysis of PAC measures, and (4) extended PAC visualization capabilities. Tensorpac is distributed under a BSD-3-Clause license and can be launched on any operating system (Linux, OSX and Windows). It can be installed directly via pip or downloaded from Github (https://github.com/EtienneCmb/tensorpac). By making Tensorpac available, we aim to enhance the reproducibility and quality of PAC research, and provide open tools that will accelerate future method development in neuroscience. Etienne Combrisson, Timothy Nest, Andrea Brovelli, Robin A. A. Ince, Juan L. P. Soto, Aymeric Guillot, Karim Jerbi |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |