Dung Nguyen 0002

dblp:13/2526-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
6 papers
Privacy and data protection · 90% Network security · 10%
Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 71% Approximation and online algorithms · 29%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
4.062025
Controlling The Spread of Epidemics on Networks with Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2025
Differentially private exact recovery for stochastic block models · ICML 2024
Faster approximate subgraph counts with privacy · NeurIPS 2023
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
private community detection
1.322024
Differentially private exact recovery for stochastic block models · ICML 2024
Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community detection
1.322024
Differentially private exact recovery for stochastic block models · ICML 2024
Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
edge differential privacy
1.332024
Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022
Differentially Private Densest Subgraph Detection · ICML 2021
Differentially private exact recovery for stochastic block models · ICML 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private graph algorithms
0.812024
Differentially private exact recovery for stochastic block models · ICML 2024
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data processing
graph data privacy
0.712023
Faster approximate subgraph counts with privacy · NeurIPS 2023
Approximation and online algorithms
facility location
0.712023
Differentially Private Partial Set Cover with Applications to Facility Location · IJCAI 2023
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms
0.712023
Faster approximate subgraph counts with privacy · NeurIPS 2023
Approximation and online algorithms
set cover
0.712023
Differentially Private Partial Set Cover with Applications to Facility Location · IJCAI 2023
Graph algorithms and graph theory
subgraph counting
0.712023
Faster approximate subgraph counts with privacy · NeurIPS 2023
Graph algorithms and graph theory
dense subgraph discovery
0.512021
Differentially Private Densest Subgraph Detection · ICML 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph mining
0.512021
Differentially Private Densest Subgraph Detection · ICML 2021
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.112021
Differentially Private Densest Subgraph Detection · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

information-theoretic bounds · 1.5exact recovery analysis · 1.5smooth sensitivity · 1.3max-flow · 1.3local sensitivity · 1.3differential privacy · 1.3approximation algorithm · 1.3graph perturbation · 1.1spectral radius control · 0.9multi-set multi-cover · 0.9stability-based mechanism · 0.6sampling-based mechanism · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Contrastive Explainable Clustering with Differential Privacy
Dung Nguyen 0002, Ariel Vetzler, Sarit Kraus, Anil Vullikanti
AAMAS1
2025 Controlling The Spread of Epidemics on Networks with Differential Privacy
abstract
Designing effective strategies for controlling epidemic spread by vaccination is an important question in epidemiology, especially in the early stages when vaccines are limited. This is a challenging question when the contact network is very heterogeneous, and strategies based on controlling network properties, such as the degree and spectral radius, have been shown to be effective. Implementation of such strategies requires detailed information on the contact structure, which might be sensitive in many applications. Our focus here is on choosing effective vaccination strategies when the edges are sensitive and differential privacy guarantees are needed. Our main contributions are $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differentially private algorithms for designing vaccination strategies by reducing the maximum degree and spectral radius. Our key technique is a private algorithm for the multi-set multi-cover problem, which we use for controlling network properties. We evaluate privacy-utility tradeoffs of our algorithms on multiple synthetic and real-world networks, and show their effectiveness.
Dung Nguyen 0002, Aravind Srinivasan, Renata Valieva, Anil Vullikanti
NeurIPS1
2024 Computing epidemic metrics with edge differential privacy
George Z. Li, Dung Nguyen 0002, Anil Vullikanti
AISTATS2
2024 Differentially private exact recovery for stochastic block models
abstract
Stochastic block models (SBMs) are a very commonly studied network model for community detection algorithms. In the standard form of an SBM, the $n$ vertices (or nodes) of a graph are generally divided into multiple pre-determined communities (or clusters). Connections between pairs of vertices are generated randomly and independently with pre-defined probabilities, which depend on the communities containing the two nodes. A fundamental problem in SBMs is the recovery of the community structure, and sharp information-theoretic bounds are known for recoverability for many versions of SBMs. Our focus here is the recoverability problem in SBMs when the network is private. Under the edge differential privacy model, we derive conditions for exact recoverability in three different versions of SBMs, namely Asymmetric SBM (when communities have non-uniform sizes), General Structure SBM (with outliers), and Censored SBM (with edge features). Our private algorithms have polynomial running time w.r.t. the input graph’s size, and match the recovery thresholds of the non-private setting when $\epsilon\rightarrow\infty$. In contrast, the previous best results for recoverability in SBMs only hold for the symmetric case (equal size communities), and run in quasi-polynomial time, or in polynomial time with recovery thresholds being tight up to some constants from the non-private settings.
Dung Nguyen 0002, Anil Vullikanti
ICML1
2023 Differentially Private Partial Set Cover with Applications to Facility Location
abstract
Set Cover is a fundamental problem in combinatorial optimization which has been studied for many decades due to its various applications across multiple domains. In many of these domains, the input data consists of locations, relationships, and other sensitive information of individuals which may leaked due to the set cover output. Attempts have been made to design privacy-preserving algorithms to solve the Set Cover under privacy constraints. Under differential privacy, it has been proved that the Set Cover problem has strong impossibility results and no explicit forms of the output can be released to the public. In this work, we observe that these hardness results dissolve when we turn to the Partial Set Cover problem, where we only need to cover a ρ ∈ (0,1) fraction of the elements. We show that this relaxation enables us to avoid the impossibility results, and give the first algorithm which outputs an explicit form of set cover with non-trivial utility guarantees under differential privacy. Using our algorithm as a subroutine, we design a differentially private bicriteria algorithm to solve a recently proposed facility location problem for vaccine distribution which generalizes the k-supplier with outliers. Our analysis shows that relaxing the covering requirement to serve only a ρ ∈ (0,1) fraction of the population/universe also allows us to circumvent the inherent hardness of k-supplier and give the first non-trivial guarantees.
George Z. Li, Dung Nguyen 0002, Anil Vullikanti
IJCAI2
2023 Faster approximate subgraph counts with privacy
abstract
One of the most common problems studied in the context of differential privacy for graph data is counting the number of non-induced embeddings of a subgraph in a given graph. These counts have very high global sensitivity. Therefore, adding noise based on powerful alternative techniques, such as smooth sensitivity and higher-order local sensitivity have been shown to give significantly better accuracy. However, all these alternatives to global sensitivity become computationally very expensive, and to date efficient polynomial time algorithms are known only for few selected subgraphs, such as triangles, $k$-triangles, and $k$-stars. In this paper, we show that good approximations to these sensitivity metrics can be still used to get private algorithms. Using this approach, we much faster algorithms for privately counting the number of triangles in real-world social networks, which can be easily parallelized. We also give a private polynomial time algorithm for counting any constant size subgraph using less noise than the global sensitivity; we show this can be improved significantly for counting paths in special classes of graphs.
Dung Nguyen 0002, Mahantesh Halappanavar, S. Venkatesh 0001, Anil Vullikanti
NeurIPS1
2022 Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models
abstract
The goal of community detection over graphs is to recover underlying labels/attributes of users (e.g., political affiliation) given the connectivity between users. There has been significant recent progress on understanding the fundamental limits of community detection when the graph is generated from a stochastic block model (SBM). Specifically, sharp information theoretic limits and efficient algorithms have been obtained for SBMs as a function of $p$ and $q$, which represent the intra-community and inter-community connection probabilities. In this paper, we study the community detection problem while preserving the privacy of the individual connections between the vertices. Focusing on the notion of $(\epsilon, \delta)$-edge differential privacy (DP), we seek to understand the fundamental tradeoffs between $(p, q)$, DP budget $(\epsilon, \delta)$, and computational efficiency for exact recovery of community labels. To this end, we present and analyze the associated information-theoretic tradeoffs for three differentially private community recovery mechanisms: a) stability based mechanism; b) sampling based mechanisms; and c) graph perturbation mechanisms. Our main findings are that stability and sampling based mechanisms lead to a superior tradeoff between $(p,q)$ and the privacy budget $(\epsilon, \delta)$; however this comes at the expense of higher computational complexity. On the other hand, albeit low complexity, graph perturbation mechanisms require the privacy budget $\epsilon$ to scale as $\Omega(\log(n))$ for exact recovery.
Mohamed S. Mohamed, Dung Nguyen 0002, Anil Vullikanti, Ravi Tandon
ICML2
2021 Differentially Private Densest Subgraph Detection
abstract
Densest subgraph detection is a fundamental graph mining problem, with a large number of applications. There has been a lot of work on efficient algorithms for finding the densest subgraph in massive networks. However, in many domains, the network is private, and returning a densest subgraph can reveal information about the network. Differential privacy is a powerful framework to handle such settings. We study the densest subgraph problem in the edge privacy model, in which the edges of the graph are private. We present the first sequential and parallel differentially private algorithms for this problem. We show that our algorithms have an additive approximation guarantee. We evaluate our algorithms on a large number of real-world networks, and observe a good privacy-accuracy tradeoff when the network has high density.
Dung Nguyen 0002, Anil Vullikanti
ICML1