Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Patricia L. Whetzel
dblp:13/3603
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0002-3458-4839ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 87% Computational science and engineering · 13% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
ontology-based annotation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | OntoMaton: a Bioportal powered ontology widget for Google Spreadsheets · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › ontology
ontology development |
0.1 | 2 | 2013 | The MGED Ontology: a resource for semantics-based description of microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2006 OntoMaton: a Bioportal powered ontology widget for Google Spreadsheets · Bioinform. 2013 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific data management
data standards |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | The MGED Ontology: a resource for semantics-based description of microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
data integration |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
gene expression data management |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ontology lookup web services · 0.2ontology engineering · 0.1ontology-based annotation · 0.0MAGE-ML · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Getting Lucky in Ontology Search: A Data-Driven Evaluation Framework for Ontology Ranking
Natasha F. Noy, Paul R. Alexander, Rave Harpaz, Patricia L. Whetzel, Ray W. Fergerson, Mark A. Musen |
ISWC (1) | 4 |
| 2013 | OntoMaton: a Bioportal powered ontology widget for Google SpreadsheetsabstractMOTIVATION: Data collection in spreadsheets is ubiquitous, but current solutions lack support for collaborative semantic annotation that would promote shared and interdisciplinary annotation practices, supporting geographically distributed players. RESULTS: OntoMaton is an open source solution that brings ontology lookup and tagging capabilities into a cloud-based collaborative editing environment, harnessing Google Spreadsheets and the NCBO Web services. It is a general purpose, format-agnostic tool that may serve as a component of the ISA software suite. OntoMaton can also be used to assist the ontology development process. AVAILABILITY: OntoMaton is freely available from Google widgets under the CPAL open source license; documentation and examples at: https://github.com/ISA-tools/OntoMaton. Eamonn Maguire, Alejandra N. González-Beltrán, Patricia L. Whetzel, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Philippe Rocca-Serra |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2012 | The National Center for Biomedical OntologyabstractThe National Center for Biomedical Ontology is now in its seventh year. The goals of this National Center for Biomedical Computing are to: create and maintain a repository of biomedical ontologies and terminologies; build tools and web services to enable the use of ontologies and terminologies in clinical and translational research; educate their trainees and the scientific community broadly about biomedical ontology and ontology-based technology and best practices; and collaborate with a variety of groups who develop and use ontologies and terminologies in biomedicine. The centerpiece of the National Center for Biomedical Ontology is a web-based resource known as BioPortal. BioPortal makes available for research in computationally useful forms more than 270 of the world's biomedical ontologies and terminologies, and supports a wide range of web services that enable investigators to use the ontologies to annotate and retrieve data, to generate value sets and special-purpose lexicons, and to perform advanced analytics on a wide range of biomedical data. Mark A. Musen, Natasha F. Noy, Nigam H. Shah, Patricia L. Whetzel, Christopher G. Chute, Margaret-Anne D. Storey, Barry Smith 0001 |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 4 |
| 2011 | The Biomedical Resource Ontology (BRO) to enable resource discovery in clinical and translational researchabstractThe biomedical research community relies on a diverse set of resources, both within their own institutions and at other research centers. In addition, an increasing number of shared electronic resources have been developed. Without effective means to locate and query these resources, it is challenging, if not impossible, for investigators to be aware of the myriad resources available, or to effectively perform resource discovery when the need arises. In this paper, we describe the development and use of the Biomedical Resource Ontology (BRO) to enable semantic annotation and discovery of biomedical resources. We also describe the Resource Discovery System (RDS) which is a federated, inter-institutional pilot project that uses the BRO to facilitate resource discovery on the Internet. Through the RDS framework and its associated Biositemaps infrastructure, the BRO facilitates semantic search and discovery of biomedical resources, breaking down barriers and streamlining scientific research that will improve human health. Jessica D. Tenenbaum, Patricia L. Whetzel, Kent Anderson, Charles D. Borromeo, Ivo D. Dinov, Davera Gabriel, Beth A. Kirschner, Barbara Mirel, Timothy D. Morris, Natasha F. Noy, Csongor Nyulas, David Rubenson, Paul R. Saxman, Nancy Whelan, Zachary C. Wright, Brian D. Athey, Michael J. Becich, Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, Mark A. Musen, Kevin A. Smith 0001, Alice F. Tarantal, Daniel L. Rubin, Peter Lyster |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 2 |
| 2006 | The MGED Ontology: a resource for semantics-based description of microarray experimentsabstractMOTIVATION: The generation of large amounts of microarray data and the need to share these data bring challenges for both data management and annotation and highlights the need for standards. MIAME specifies the minimum information needed to describe a microarray experiment and the Microarray Gene Expression Object Model (MAGE-OM) and resulting MAGE-ML provide a mechanism to standardize data representation for data exchange, however a common terminology for data annotation is needed to support these standards. RESULTS: Here we describe the MGED Ontology (MO) developed by the Ontology Working Group of the Microarray Gene Expression Data (MGED) Society. The MO provides terms for annotating all aspects of a microarray experiment from the design of the experiment and array layout, through to the preparation of the biological sample and the protocols used to hybridize the RNA and analyze the data. The MO was developed to provide terms for annotating experiments in line with the MIAME guidelines, i.e. to provide the semantics to describe a microarray experiment according to the concepts specified in MIAME. The MO does not attempt to incorporate terms from existing ontologies, e.g. those that deal with anatomical parts or developmental stages terms, but provides a framework to reference terms in other ontologies and therefore facilitates the use of ontologies in microarray data annotation. AVAILABILITY: The MGED Ontology version.1.2.0 is available as a file in both DAML and OWL formats at http://mged.sourceforge.net/ontologies/index.php. Release notes and annotation examples are provided. The MO is also provided via the NCICB's Enterprise Vocabulary System (http://nciterms.nci.nih.gov/NCIBrowser/Dictionary.do). CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Patricia L. Whetzel, Helen E. Parkinson, Helen C. Causton, Liju Fan, Jennifer Fostel, Gilberto Fragoso, Laurence Game, Mervi Heiskanen, Norman Morrison, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Chris F. Taylor, Joseph White, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr. |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2006 | A simple spreadsheet-based, MIAME-supportive format for microarray data: MAGE-TABabstractBACKGROUND: Sharing of microarray data within the research community has been greatly facilitated by the development of the disclosure and communication standards MIAME and MAGE-ML by the MGED Society. However, the complexity of the MAGE-ML format has made its use impractical for laboratories lacking dedicated bioinformatics support. RESULTS: We propose a simple tab-delimited, spreadsheet-based format, MAGE-TAB, which will become a part of the MAGE microarray data standard and can be used for annotating and communicating microarray data in a MIAME compliant fashion. CONCLUSION: MAGE-TAB will enable laboratories without bioinformatics experience or support to manage, exchange and submit well-annotated microarray data in a standard format using a spreadsheet. The MAGE-TAB format is self-contained, and does not require an understanding of MAGE-ML or XML. Tim F. Rayner, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Paul T. Spellman, Helen C. Causton, Anna Farne, Ele Holloway, Rafael A. Irizarry, Junmin Liu, Donald Maier, Michael Miller 0001, Kjell Petersen, John Quackenbush, Gavin Sherlock, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., Joseph White, Patricia L. Whetzel, Farrell Wymore, Helen E. Parkinson, Ugis Sarkans, Catherine A. Ball, Alvis Brazma |
BMC Bioinform. | 16 |
| 2004 | RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studiesabstractMOTIVATION: Gene expression array technology has become increasingly widespread among researchers who recognize its numerous promises. At the same time, bench biologists and bioinformaticians have come to appreciate increasingly the importance of establishing a collaborative dialog from the onset of a study and of collecting and exchanging detailed information on the many experimental and computational procedures using a structured mechanism. This is crucial for adequate analyses of this kind of data. RESULTS: The RNA Abundance Database (RAD; http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/RAD) provides a comprehensive MIAME-supportive infrastructure for gene expression data management and makes extensive use of ontologies. Specific details on protocols, biomaterials, study designs, etc. are collected through a user-friendly suite of web annotation forms. Software has been developed to generate MAGE-ML documents to enable easy export of studies stored in RAD to any other database accepting data in this format (e.g. ArrayExpress). RAD is part of a more general Genomics Unified Schema (http://www.gusdb.org), which includes a richly annotated gene index (http://www.allgenes.org), thus providing a platform that integrates genomic and transcriptomic data from multiple organisms. This infrastructure enables a large variety of queries that incorporate visualization and analysis tools and have been tailored to serve the specific needs of projects focusing on particular organisms or biological systems. Elisabetta Manduchi, Gregory R. Grant, Junmin Liu, Matthew D. Mailman, Angel D. Pizarro, Patricia L. Whetzel, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr. |
Bioinform. | 7 |