Harald Kolarczyk

dblp:13/407 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 38% Software testing · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
global software development
0.012001
Improving Validation Activities in a Global Software Development · ICSE 2001
Software maintenance and evolution
software inspection
0.012001
Improving Validation Activities in a Global Software Development · ICSE 2001
Software testing
fault detection
0.012001
Improving Validation Activities in a Global Software Development · ICSE 2001
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
process metrics
0.012001
Improving Validation Activities in a Global Software Development · ICSE 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hypothesis testing · 0.0case study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Improving Validation Activities in a Global Software Development
abstract
Global software development challenges traditional techniques of software engineering, such as peer reviews or teamwork. Effective teamwork and coaching of engineers contribute highly towards successful projects. In this case study, we evaluate experiences with validation activities in a global setting within Alcatel's switching and routing business. We investigate three hypotheses related to the effects of (a) collocated inspections, (b) intensive coaching and (c) feature-oriented development teams on globally distributed projects. As all these activities mean an initial investment compared to a standard process with scattered activities, the major validation criteria for the three hypotheses are: (1) cost reduction due to earlier defect detection and (2) less defects introduced. The data is taken from a sample of over 60 international projects of various sizes, from which we have collected all types of product and process metrics over the past four years.
Christof Ebert, Casimiro Hernandez Parro, Roland Suttels, Harald Kolarczyk
ICSE4