Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaojun Wu 0007
dblp:13/5168-7
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7085-4720ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
anomaly detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | BAG: Benchmarking Anomaly Detection on Dynamic Graphs · AAAI 2026 |
Data mining › anomaly detection › graph anomaly detection
dynamic graph anomaly detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | BAG: Benchmarking Anomaly Detection on Dynamic Graphs · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
dynamic graph neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | BAG: Benchmarking Anomaly Detection on Dynamic Graphs · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmarking · 2.0evaluation protocols · 1.0evaluation protocol · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | BAG: Benchmarking Anomaly Detection on Dynamic GraphsabstractAnomaly detection in dynamic graphs is a critical area of research that focuses on identifying abnormal components within evolving graph structures that deviate significantly from typical patterns. Despite advancements in traditional temporal pattern mining and deep learning techniques, a comprehensive benchmarking framework for Dynamic Graph Anomaly Detection (DyGAD) has been lacking. To address this gap, we introduce BAG, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed for anomaly detection on dynamic graphs. BAG enables extensive evaluation of 25 leading DyGAD models, covering both classical approaches and advanced Dynamic Graph Neural Networks (DGNNs), across 10 diverse real-world datasets that include both synthetic and naturally occurring anomalies. The framework supports evaluations at both the edge and node levels, offering a robust tool to advance DyGAD research. Our main finding is that Continuous-time Dynamic Graph (CTDG) models demonstrate superior performance and potential in detecting anomalies in dynamic graph edges, compared to Discrete-time Dynamic Graph (DTDG) models. Furthermore, the results reveal that existing methods are less effective at detecting organic anomalies, primarily due to the presence of temporal anomalies and highly imbalanced samples. The proposed BAG benchmark significantly enhances the evaluation of DyGAD methods by improving dataset selection, metric application, and model training. Moreover, BAG supports reproducibility and further exploration in this field by integrating all models, datasets, and evaluation protocols into an open-source repository. Fengrui Hua, Yiyan Qi, Zikai Wei, Yuxing Tian, Chengjin Xu, Xiaojun Wu 0007, Jia Li 0009, Jian Guo 0016 |
AAAI | 6 |