Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

John F. Dovidio

dblp:13/5397 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1981
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.011981
Spatial Representations of Knowledge: Validity and Applications to Information Science · SIGIR 1981
Information retrieval › retrieval models › language model
term dependency models
0.011981
Spatial Representations of Knowledge: Validity and Applications to Information Science · SIGIR 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

similarity ratings · 0.0correlation analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1981 Spatial Representations of Knowledge: Validity and Applications to Information Science
abstract
This research examined the relationship between subjects' knowledge of an area and their similarity ratings of pairs of concepts. Knowledge was operationalized as (1) test score performance, and (2) correspondence with an expert's similarity judgments. Subjects (n=55) were exposed to a three-week module on social psychology as part of their introductory psychology course. At the end of this course segment they were administered an examination and, later, a term similarity questionnaire. Students' similarity ratings related to both exam score and similarity ratings of the expert. Furthermore, as expected, test performance was strongly related (r=+.55) to the correlation with the expert's similarity judgments. A model based on term similarity judgments was proposed as a theoretical explanation of how term dependence models influence information retrieval system performance.
Terry Noreault, John F. Dovidio
SIGIR2