Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan Feinberg

dblp:13/544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 5Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Web and social media mining · 72% Information retrieval · 28%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.112010
Patterns of usage in an enterprise file-sharing service: publicizing, discovering, and telling the news · CHI 2010
Visualization and visual analytics › text visualization
tag cloud
0.112009
Participatory Visualization with Wordle · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2009
Visualization and visual analytics
text visualization
0.112009
Participatory Visualization with Wordle · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2009
Collaborative and social computing › computer-supported cooperative work › organizational collaboration
enterprise collaboration
0.112006
Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise · CHI 2006
Collaborative and social computing › social media
social bookmarking
0.112006
Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise · CHI 2006
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.012013
Google+Ripples: a native visualization of information flow · WWW 2013
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval
search and browsing
0.012006
Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise · CHI 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

node-link diagram · 0.3circular treemap · 0.3large-scale survey · 0.2in-the-wild observation · 0.2user survey · 0.1log file analysis · 0.1field trial · 0.1survey · 0.1factor analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Google+Ripples: a native visualization of information flow
abstract
G+ Ripples is a visualization of information flow that shows users how public posts are shared on Google+. Unlike other social network visualizations, Ripples exists as a "native" visualization: it is directly accessible from public posts on Google+. This unique position leads to both new constraints and new possibilities for design. We describe the visualization technique, which is a new mix of node-and-link and circular treemap metaphors. We then describe user reactions as well as some of the patterns of sharing that are made evident by the Ripples visualization.
Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, Jack Hebert, Geoffrey Borggaard, Alison Cichowlas, Jonathan Feinberg, Jon Orwant, Christopher Richard Wren
WWW6
2010 Patterns of usage in an enterprise file-sharing service: publicizing, discovering, and telling the news
abstract
How do people use an enterprise file-sharing service? We describe patterns of usage in a social file-sharing service that was deployed in a large multinational enterprise. Factor analyses revealed four factors: Upload & Publicize (regarding one's own files); Annotate & Watch (add information to files and maintain awareness); Discover & Tell (find files uploaded by other users, and communicate to additional users about those files); and Refind (re-use one's own files). We explore the attributes of users who score highly on each of these factors, and we propose implications for design to encourage innovation in usage.
Michael J. Muller, David R. Millen, Jonathan Feinberg
CHI3
2010 We are all lurkers: consuming behaviors among authors and readers in an enterprise file-sharing service
abstract
Most knowledge repositories focus on the role of knowledge-creators. In this paper, by contrast, we examined the work of Lurkers in an enterprise file-sharing service, and we compared their lurking behaviors to the lurking behaviors of users who uploaded files (Uploaders), and users who contributed metadata about files (Contributors). For comparability, we restricted our analyses to the consuming behaviors that are common to the three roles (Uploaders, Contributors, and Lurkers). Independent principal components analysis showed highly similar seven-factor solutions of lurking activities across all three roles, although the relative emphases of those factors varied across roles. Uploaders tended to view and download more groups of files, showed less emphasis on searching for files, and tended to work directly with the file-sharing application, unmediated by external applications. Contributors showed the opposite pattern: more emphasis on searching and responding to recommendations from other users, often via a form of remote access. Lurkers' lurking behaviors were less intense, and showed little difference in emphases among the lurker factors. We use these results, and the published research literature, to motivate a research agenda for lurkers in social media.
Michael J. Muller, N. Sadat Shami, David R. Millen, Jonathan Feinberg
GROUP4
2009 Information Curators in an Enterprise File-Sharing Service
Michael J. Muller, David R. Millen, Jonathan Feinberg
ECSCW3
2009 Participatory Visualization with Wordle
abstract
We discuss the design and usage of "Wordle," a web-based tool for visualizing text. Wordle creates tag-cloud-like displays that give careful attention to typography, color, and composition. We describe the algorithms used to balance various aesthetic criteria and create the distinctive Wordle layouts. We then present the results of a study of Wordle usage, based both on spontaneous behaviour observed in the wild, and on a large-scale survey of Wordle users. The results suggest that Wordles have become a kind of medium of expression, and that a "participatory culture" has arisen around them.
Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, Jonathan Feinberg
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.3
2007 Social bookmarking and exploratory search
David R. Millen, Steven Whittaker, Jonathan Feinberg
ECSCW4
2006 Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise
abstract
We describe a social bookmarking service de-signed for a large enterprise. We discuss design principles addressing online identity, privacy, information discovery (including search and pivot browsing), and service extensi-bility based on a web-friendly architectural style. In addi-tion we describe the key design features of our implementa-tion. We provide the results of an eight week field trial of this enterprise social bookmarking service, including a de-scription of user activities, based on log file analysis. We share the results of a user survey focused on the benefits of the service. The feedback from the user trial, comprising survey results, log file analysis and informal communica-tions, is quite positive and suggests several promising en-hancements to the service. Finally, we discuss potential extension and integration of social bookmarking services with other corporate collaborative applications.
David R. Millen, Jonathan Feinberg, Bernard Kerr
CHI2