Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas J. Bate
dblp:13/7070
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis › biological network inference
gene network inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Gene network reconstruction from transcriptional dynamics under kinetic model uncertainty: a case for the second derivative · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription dynamics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Gene network reconstruction from transcriptional dynamics under kinetic model uncertainty: a case for the second derivative · Bioinform. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
second derivative approximation · 0.1bayesian model averaging · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Gene network reconstruction from transcriptional dynamics under kinetic model uncertainty: a case for the second derivativeabstractMOTIVATION: Measurements of gene expression over time enable the reconstruction of transcriptional networks. However, Bayesian networks and many other current reconstruction methods rely on assumptions that conflict with the differential equations that describe transcriptional kinetics. Practical approximations of kinetic models would enable inferring causal relationships between genes from expression data of microarray, tag-based and conventional platforms, but conclusions are sensitive to the assumptions made. RESULTS: The representation of a sufficiently large portion of genome enables computation of an upper bound on how much confidence one may place in influences between genes on the basis of expression data. Information about which genes encode transcription factors is not necessary but may be incorporated if available. The methodology is generalized to cover cases in which expression measurements are missing for many of the genes that might control the transcription of the genes of interest. The assumption that the gene expression level is roughly proportional to the rate of translation led to better empirical performance than did either the assumption that the gene expression level is roughly proportional to the protein level or the Bayesian model average of both assumptions. AVAILABILITY: http://www.oisb.ca points to R code implementing the methods (R Development Core Team 2004). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://www.davidbickel.com. David R. Bickel, Zahra Montazeri, Pei-Chun Hsieh, Mary Beatty, Shai J. Lawit, Nicholas J. Bate |
Bioinform. | 6 |