Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

D. Lu

dblp:13/7529 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › monte carlo simulation
importance sampling
0.011991
Estimation variance bounds of importance sampling simulations in digital communication systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1991
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.011991
Estimation variance bounds of importance sampling simulations in digital communication systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1991
Physical-layer communications › error probability analysis
bit error rate estimation
0.011991
Estimation variance bounds of importance sampling simulations in digital communication systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monte carlo simulation · 0.0importance sampling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 Estimation variance bounds of importance sampling simulations in digital communication systems
abstract
In practical applications of importance sampling (IS) simulation, two basic problems are encountered, that of determining the estimation variance and that of evaluating the proper IS parameters needed in the simulations. The authors derive new upper and lower bounds on the estimation variance which are applicable to IS techniques. The upper bound is simple to evaluate and may be minimized by the proper selection of the IS parameter. Thus, lower and upper bounds on the improvement ratio of various IS techniques relative to the direct Monte Carlo simulation are also available. These bounds are shown to be useful and computationally simple to obtain. Based on the proposed technique, one can readily find practical suboptimum IS parameters. Numerical results indicate that these bounding techniques are useful for IS simulations of linear and nonlinear communication systems with intersymbol interference in which bit error rate and IS estimation variances cannot be obtained readily using prior techniques.>
D. Lu, K. Yao
IEEE Trans. Commun.1