Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
D. Lu
dblp:13/7529
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › monte carlo simulation
importance sampling |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Estimation variance bounds of importance sampling simulations in digital communication systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1991 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Estimation variance bounds of importance sampling simulations in digital communication systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1991 |
Physical-layer communications › error probability analysis
bit error rate estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Estimation variance bounds of importance sampling simulations in digital communication systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
monte carlo simulation · 0.0importance sampling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | Estimation variance bounds of importance sampling simulations in digital communication systemsabstractIn practical applications of importance sampling (IS) simulation, two basic problems are encountered, that of determining the estimation variance and that of evaluating the proper IS parameters needed in the simulations. The authors derive new upper and lower bounds on the estimation variance which are applicable to IS techniques. The upper bound is simple to evaluate and may be minimized by the proper selection of the IS parameter. Thus, lower and upper bounds on the improvement ratio of various IS techniques relative to the direct Monte Carlo simulation are also available. These bounds are shown to be useful and computationally simple to obtain. Based on the proposed technique, one can readily find practical suboptimum IS parameters. Numerical results indicate that these bounding techniques are useful for IS simulations of linear and nonlinear communication systems with intersymbol interference in which bit error rate and IS estimation variances cannot be obtained readily using prior techniques.> D. Lu, K. Yao |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |