The B2B Meeting Scheduling Optimization Problem (B2BSP) consists of scheduling a set of meetings between given pairs of participants to an event, minimizing idle time periods in participants' schedules, while taking into account participants’ availability and accommodation capacity. Therefore, it constitutes a challenging combinatorial problem in many real-world B2B events. This work presents a comparative study of several approaches to solve this problem. They are based on Constraint Programming (CP), Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) and Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT). The CP approach relies on using global constraints and has been implemented in MiniZinc to be able to compare CP, Lazy Clause Generation and MIP as solving technologies in this setting. A pure MIP encoding is also presented. Finally, an alternative viewpoint is considered under MaxSAT, showing the best performance when considering some implied constraints. Experimental results on real world B2B instances, as well as on crafted ones, show that the MaxSAT approach is the one with the best performance for this problem, exhibiting better solving times, sometimes even orders of magnitude smaller than CP and MIP.

When solving a combinatorial problem using propositional satisfiability (SAT), the encoding of the constraints is of vital importance. Pseudo-Boolean (PB) constraints appear frequently in a wide variety of problems. When PB constraints occur together with at-most-one (AMO) constraints over the same variables, they can be combined into PB(AMO) constraints. In this paper we present new encodings for PB(AMO) constraints. Our experiments show that these encodings can be substantially smaller than those of PB constraints and allow many more instances to be solved within a time limit. We also observed that there is no single overall winner among the considered encodings, but efficiency of each encoding may depend on PB(AMO) characteristics such as the magnitude of coefficient values.

The Business-to-Business Meeting Scheduling problem consists of scheduling a set of meetings between given pairs of participants to an event, while taking into account participants’ availability and accommodation capacity. A crucial aspect of this problem is that breaks in participants’ schedules should be avoided as much as possible. It constitutes a challenging combinatorial problem that needs to be solved for many real world brokerage events. In this paper we present a comparative study of Constraint Programming (CP), MixedInteger Programming (MIP) and Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) approaches to this problem. The CP approach relies on using global constraints and has been implemented in MiniZinc to be able to compare CP, Lazy Clause Generation and MIP as solving technologies in this setting. We also present a pure MIP encoding. Finally, an alternative viewpoint is considered under MaxSAT, showing best performance when considering some implied constraints. Experiments conducted on real world instances, as well as on crafted ones, show that the MaxSAT approach is the one with the best performance for this problem, exhibiting better solving times, sometimes even orders of magnitude smaller than CP and MIP.

Pseudo-Boolean (PB) constraints are usually encoded into Boolean clauses using compact Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) representations. Although these constraints appear in many problems, they are particularly useful for representing resource constraints in scheduling problems. Sometimes, the Boolean variables in the PB constraints have implicit at-most-one relations. In this work we introduce a way to take advantage of these implicit relations to obtain a compact Multi-Decision Diagram (MDD) representation for those PB constraints. We provide empirical evidence of the usefulness of this technique for some Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP) variants, namely the Multi-Mode RCPSP (MRCPSP) and the RCPSP with Time-Dependent Resource Capacities and Requests (RCPSP/t). The size reduction of the representation of the PB constraints lets us decrease the number of Boolean variables in the encodings by one order of magnitude. We close/certify the optimum of many instances of these problems.

The Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (MRCPSP) is a generalization of the well known Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP). The most common exact approaches for solving this problem are based on branch-and-bound algorithms, mixed integer linear programming and Boolean satisfiability (SAT). In this paper, we present a new exact approach for solving this problem, using Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT). We provide two encodings into SMT and several reformulation and preprocessing techniques. The optimization algorithm that we propose uses an SMT solver as an oracle, and depending on its answer is able to update the encoding for the next optimization step. We report extensive performance experiments showing the utility of the proposed techniques and the good performance of our approach that allows us to close several open instances.