Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hongsong Yuan

dblp:13/9087 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 47% Generative modeling · 37% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 93% Information theory · 7%
Network and information security
1 paper
Biometric security · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
latent space model
1.022022
Community detection in sparse latent space models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Universal Latent Space Model Fitting for Large Networks with Edge Covariates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph clustering
0.722022
Community detection in sparse latent space models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Universal Latent Space Model Fitting for Large Networks with Edge Covariates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph clustering
spectral clustering
0.612022
Community detection in sparse latent space models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
statistical network models
0.412020
Universal Latent Space Model Fitting for Large Networks with Edge Covariates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization
0.412020
Universal Latent Space Model Fitting for Large Networks with Edge Covariates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Biometric security
biometric recognition
0.112010
Asymptotic Biometric Analysis for Large Gallery Sizes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010
Biometric security
fingerprint recognition
0.112010
Asymptotic Biometric Analysis for Large Gallery Sizes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010
Information theory › probability theory › limit theorems
extreme value theory
0.012010
Asymptotic Biometric Analysis for Large Gallery Sizes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

projected gradient descent · 0.9nuclear norm penalization · 0.9spectral clustering · 0.6normalized edge counting · 0.6local refinement · 0.6likelihood ratio test · 0.6mixture modeling · 0.2extreme value theory · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Community detection in sparse latent space models
abstract
We show that a simple community detection algorithm originated from stochastic blockmodel literature achieves consistency, and even optimality, for a broad and flexible class of sparse latent space models. The class of models includes latent eigenmodels (Hoff, 2008). The community detection algorithm is based on spectral clustering followed by local refinement via normalized edge counting. It is easy to implement and attains high accuracy with a low computational budget. The proof of its optimality depends on a neat equivalence between likelihood ratio test and edge counting in a simple vs. simple hypothesis testing problem that underpins the refinement step, which could be of independent interest.
Fengnan Gao, Zongming Ma, Hongsong Yuan
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2020 Universal Latent Space Model Fitting for Large Networks with Edge Covariates
abstract
Latent space models are effective tools for statistical modeling and visualization of network data. Due to their close connection to generalized linear models, it is also natural to incorporate covariate information in them. The current paper presents two universal fitting algorithms for networks with edge covariates: one based on nuclear norm penalization and the other based on projected gradient descent. Both algorithms are motivated by maximizing the likelihood function for an existing class of inner-product models, and we establish their statistical rates of convergence for these models. In addition, the theory informs us that both methods work simultaneously for a wide range of different latent space models that allow latent positions to affect edge formation in flexible ways, such as distance models. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the methods is demonstrated on a number of real world network data sets for different statistical tasks, including community detection with and without edge covariates, and network assisted learning.
Zongming Ma, Hongsong Yuan
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2010 Asymptotic Biometric Analysis for Large Gallery Sizes
abstract
Motivated by the need to predict the future biometric performance of the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology program as it increases the size of its watchlist database, we use extreme-value theory (which is an asymptotic theory for the maximum of a large number of independent and identically distributed random variables) to analyze biometric performance as the gallery size gets very large. Due to the lack of published data for open-set fingerprint systems (where some users of the system are not on the watchlist), we assess the accuracy of our approach using the rank-one identification probability for closed-set fingerprint systems (where all users are on the watchlist). Consistent with earlier empirical observations, we find that the relationship between the rank-one identification probability and gallery size is log-linear to first-order and has a quadratic correction term, at least under our specific distributional assumptions. We also find that the probabilistic biometric model provides a good fit to empirical fingerprint data only when the genuine and impostor similarity scores are allowed to depend on the quality of the fingerprint images, which leads to genuine and impostor scores that are mixtures of distributions. Finally, we use the extreme-value approach to derive the receiver operating characteristic curve for open-set systems.
Manas Baveja, Hongsong Yuan, Lawrence M. Wein
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2