Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zheng Qu 0001
dblp:13/9687-1
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 92% Learning theory · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 87% Information theory · 13% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | L-SVRG and L-Katyusha with Arbitrary Sampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 SAGA with Arbitrary Sampling · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | L-SVRG and L-Katyusha with Arbitrary Sampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Quartz: Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent with Arbitrary Sampling · NIPS 2015 Stochastic Dual Coordinate Ascent with Adaptive Probabilities · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › variance reduction
SAGA |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SAGA with Arbitrary Sampling · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SAGA with Arbitrary Sampling · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › coordinate descent
dual coordinate ascent |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | SDNA: Stochastic Dual Newton Ascent for Empirical Risk Minimization · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | SDNA: Stochastic Dual Newton Ascent for Empirical Risk Minimization · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Even Faster Accelerated Coordinate Descent Using Non-Uniform Sampling · ICML 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › coordinate descent
accelerated coordinate descent |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Even Faster Accelerated Coordinate Descent Using Non-Uniform Sampling · ICML 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
coordinate descent |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Even Faster Accelerated Coordinate Descent Using Non-Uniform Sampling · ICML 2016 |
Information theory › signal processing › sampling theory
nonuniform sampling |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Even Faster Accelerated Coordinate Descent Using Non-Uniform Sampling · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
regularized risk minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Stochastic Dual Coordinate Ascent with Adaptive Probabilities · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › coordinate descent
stochastic dual coordinate ascent |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Stochastic Dual Coordinate Ascent with Adaptive Probabilities · ICML 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Quartz: Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent with Arbitrary Sampling · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › coordinate descent
dual coordinate ascent |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Quartz: Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent with Arbitrary Sampling · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › coordinate descent
random coordinate descent |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Quartz: Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent with Arbitrary Sampling · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization
primal-dual method |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Quartz: Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent with Arbitrary Sampling · NIPS 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
importance sampling · 1.5non-uniform sampling · 0.5expected smoothness · 0.5estimation sequence · 0.5ESO · 0.5stochastic lyapunov function · 0.4minibatching · 0.4proximal subproblem · 0.2l2 regularization · 0.2hessian · 0.2mini-batch · 0.2duality · 0.2arbitrary sampling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | L-SVRG and L-Katyusha with Arbitrary SamplingabstractWe develop and analyze a new family of nonaccelerated and accelerated loopless variance-reduced methods for finite-sum optimization problems. Our convergence analysis relies on a novel expected smoothness condition which upper bounds the variance of the stochastic gradient estimation by a constant times a distance-like function. This allows us to handle with ease arbitrary sampling schemes as well as the nonconvex case. We perform an in-depth estimation of these expected smoothness parameters and propose new importance samplings which allow linear speedup when the expected minibatch size is in a certain range. Furthermore, a connection between these expected smoothness parameters and expected separable overapproximation (ESO) is established, which allows us to exploit data sparsity as well. Our general methods and results recover as special cases the loopless SVRG and loopless Katyusha methods. Xun Qian, Zheng Qu 0001, Peter Richtárik |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2019 | SAGA with Arbitrary SamplingabstractWe study the problem of minimizing the average of a very large number of smooth functions, which is of key importance in training supervised learning models. One of the most celebrated methods in this context is the SAGA algorithm of Defazio et al. (2014). Despite years of research on the topic, a general-purpose version of SAGA—one that would include arbitrary importance sampling and minibatching schemes—does not exist. We remedy this situation and propose a general and flexible variant of SAGA following the arbitrary sampling paradigm. We perform an iteration complexity analysis of the method, largely possible due to the construction of new stochastic Lyapunov functions. We establish linear convergence rates in the smooth and strongly convex regime, and under certain error bound conditions also in a regime without strong convexity. Our rates match those of the primal-dual method Quartz (Qu et al., 2015) for which an arbitrary sampling analysis is available, which makes a significant step towards closing the gap in our understanding of complexity of primal and dual methods for finite sum problems. Finally, we show through experiments that specific variants of our general SAGA method can perform better in practice than other competing methods. Xun Qian, Zheng Qu 0001, Peter Richtárik |
ICML | 2 |
| 2017 | Checking strict positivity of Kraus maps is NP-hard
Stéphane Gaubert, Zheng Qu 0001 |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 2 |
| 2016 | SDNA: Stochastic Dual Newton Ascent for Empirical Risk MinimizationabstractWe propose a new algorithm for minimizing regularized empirical loss: Stochastic Dual Newton Ascent (SDNA). Our method is dual in nature: in each iteration we update a random subset of the dual variables. However, unlike existing methods such as stochastic dual coordinate ascent, SDNA is capable of utilizing all local curvature information contained in the examples, which leads to striking improvements in both theory and practice – sometimes by orders of magnitude. In the special case when an L2-regularizer is used in the primal, the dual problem is a concave quadratic maximization problem plus a separable term. In this regime, SDNA in each step solves a proximal subproblem involving a random principal submatrix of the Hessian of the quadratic function; whence the name of the method. Zheng Qu 0001, Peter Richtárik, Martin Takác 0001, Olivier Fercoq |
ICML | 1 |
| 2016 | Even Faster Accelerated Coordinate Descent Using Non-Uniform SamplingabstractAccelerated coordinate descent is widely used in optimization due to its cheap per-iteration cost and scalability to large-scale problems. Up to a primal-dual transformation, it is also the same as accelerated stochastic gradient descent that is one of the central methods used in machine learning. In this paper, we improve the best known running time of accelerated coordinate descent by a factor up to \sqrtn. Our improvement is based on a clean, novel non-uniform sampling that selects each coordinate with a probability proportional to the square root of its smoothness parameter. Our proof technique also deviates from the classical estimation sequence technique used in prior work. Our speed-up applies to important problems such as empirical risk minimization and solving linear systems, both in theory and in practice. Zeyuan Allen Zhu, Zheng Qu 0001, Peter Richtárik, Yang Yuan 0010 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2015 | Stochastic Dual Coordinate Ascent with Adaptive ProbabilitiesabstractThis paper introduces AdaSDCA: an adaptive variant of stochastic dual coordinate ascent (SDCA) for solving the regularized empirical risk minimization problems. Our modification consists in allowing the method adaptively change the probability distribution over the dual variables throughout the iterative process. AdaSDCA achieves provably better complexity bound than SDCA with the best fixed probability distribution, known as importance sampling. However, it is of a theoretical character as it is expensive to implement. We also propose AdaSDCA+: a practical variant which in our experiments outperforms existing non-adaptive methods. Dominik Csiba, Zheng Qu 0001, Peter Richtárik |
ICML | 2 |
| 2015 | Quartz: Randomized Dual Coordinate Ascent with Arbitrary SamplingabstractWe study the problem of minimizing the average of a large number of smooth convex functions penalized with a strongly convex regularizer. We propose and analyze a novel primal-dual method (Quartz) which at every iteration samples and updates a random subset of the dual variables, chosen according to an arbitrary distribution. In contrast to typical analysis, we directly bound the decrease of the primal-dual error (in expectation), without the need to first analyze the dual error. Depending on the choice of the sampling, we obtain efficient serial and mini-batch variants of the method. In the serial case, our bounds match the best known bounds for SDCA (both with uniform and importance sampling). With standard mini-batching, our bounds predict initial data-independent speedup as well as additional data-driven speedup which depends on spectral and sparsity properties of the data. Zheng Qu 0001, Peter Richtárik, Tong Zhang 0001 |
NIPS | 1 |