EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tatiana Xifara
dblp:130/4247
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9494-3469ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
online controlled experiments |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Decomposition in A/B Tests · KDD 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › online controlled experiments
treatment effect estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Decomposition in A/B Tests · KDD 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › online controlled experiments
a/b testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Decomposition in A/B Tests · KDD 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
frequentist inference · 0.8bayesian inference · 0.8CUPED · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Metric Decomposition in A/B TestsabstractMore than a decade ago, CUPED (Controlled Experiments Utilizing Pre-Experiment Data) mainstreamed the idea of variance reduction leveraging pre-experiment covariates. Since its introduction, it has been implemented, extended, and modernized by major online experimentation platforms. Despite the wide adoption, it is known by practitioners that the variance reduction rate from CUPED utilizing pre-experimental data varies case by case and has a theoretical limit. In theory, CUPED can be extended to augment a treatment effect estimator utilizing in-experiment data, but practical guidance on how to construct such an augmentation is lacking. In this article, we fill this gap by proposing a new direction for sensitivity improvement via treatment effect augmentation whereby a target metric of interest is decomposed into components with high signal-to-noise disparity. Inference in the context of this decomposition is developed using both frequentist and Bayesian theory. We provide three real world applications demonstrating different flavors of metric decomposition; these applications illustrate the gain in agility metric decomposition yields relative to an un-decomposed analysis. Alex Deng, Luke Hagar, Nathaniel T. Stevens, Tatiana Xifara, Amit Gandhi |
KDD | 4 |