EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sebastian Walter Schütz
dblp:130/7764 · also Sebastian Schuetz, Sebastian Walter Schuetz
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0503-4472ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Where authorities fail and experts excel: Influencing internet users' compliance intentions
Gaurav Bansal, Jason Bennett Thatcher, Sebastian Walter Schütz |
Comput. Secur. | 3 |
| 2023 | Tell me a story: The effects that narratives exert on meaningful-engagement outcomes in antiphishing training
David M. Hull, Sebastian Walter Schütz, Paul Benjamin Lowry |
Comput. Secur. | 2 |
| 2022 | It's not just about accuracy: An investigation of the human factors in users' reliance on anti-phishing tools
Sebastian Walter Schütz, Zachary R. Steelman, Rhonda Syler |
Decis. Support Syst. | 1 |
| 2021 | Combating COVID-19 fake news on social media through fact checking: antecedents and consequencesabstractThe onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was accompanied with a pandemic of fake news spreading over social media (SM). Fact checking might help combat fake news and a plethora of fact-checking platforms exist, yet few people actually use them. Moreover, whether fact checking is effective in preventing citizens from falling for fake news, particularly COVID-19 related, is unclear. Against this backdrop, we examine potential antecedents to fact checking that can be a target for interventions and establish that fact checking is actually effective for preventing the public from falling for harmful COVID-19 fake news. We use a representative U.S. sample collected in April of 2020 and find that awareness of fake news and patterns of active SM use (e.g., commenting on content instead of reading it) increases the fact checking of COVID-19 fake news, whereas SM homophily reduces fact checking and the effects of SM use as users are trapped in “echo chambers”. We also find that fact checking helps users identify accurate information on how to protect themselves against COVID-19 instead of false and often harmful claims propagated on SM. These findings highlight the importance of fact checking for combating COVID-19 fake news and help identify potential interventions. Sebastian Walter Schütz, Tracy Ann Sykes, Viswanath Venkatesh |
Eur. J. Inf. Syst. | 1 |